Preview

What Is The Difference Between St Thomas More And The Little Sisters Of The Poor

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
687 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Difference Between St Thomas More And The Little Sisters Of The Poor
Two well-known religious freedom battle stories are the stories of St. Thomas More and the Little Sisters of the Poor. Both cases have to do with Catholicism, but they both refer to different Catholic issues. Thomas More dealt with divorce, remarriage, and adultery while the Little Sisters dealt with abortion and contraceptives. In 1517, Thomas More, a scholar and lawyer born on February 7, 1478 in London, was hired by King Henry VIII and became one of the his most effective and trusted civil servants. He worked as a secretary, interpreter, speech-writer, chief diplomat, advisor, and confidant. In 1521, More was knighted, and in 1523, he became the speaker of the House of Commons. Finally, in 1525, More was made chancellor of the Duchy …show more content…
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act was the law in question. It determines whether or not a government policy places an undue burden on a religious group. If a policy does place an undue burden, the next step is to find a solution or an alternative.
In the lower courts, the Little Sisters of the Poor lost their case, but the case eventually made its way all the way to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court vacated the lower court ruling. In the words of David French, “...when the court vacates the ruling you’re challenging, that’s a win.” (French).
The biggest difference between Thomas More’s situation and the situation of the Little Sisters of the Poor is the fact that the Thomas More died and the nuns won their case. This difference has largely to do with the fact that the English government in the 1500s and today’s American government and legal system are extremely different from one another. In Tudor England, King Henry VIII had the power to do essentially anything he wanted. In today’s American society, however, the government has limited power, and people in the government don’t retain the jobs for decades at a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Jdt2 Task 1

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    References: innegan, S. (2013). Constructive Dishcarge Under Tittl VII and the ADEA. The University of Chicago Law Review, 561-562.Grace Liebermann V. Genesis Health Care - Franklin Woods Center, CCB-11-2770 (District Court of Maryland 2013).Johnson V. Lacaster-Lebabib Intermediate Unit 13, 11-cv-01598 (District Court for the Eastren District of Pennsyvania 2012).Pennsylvania State Police V. Suders, 542 US 129 (Supreme Court 2004).Religious Discrimination. (2013, 03 24). Retrieved from U.S. Equal EMployment Opportunity Commision: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/religion.cfm…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court decided to take on this case because they believed it could possibly violate the First Amendment and the Establishment Clause. The Establishment Clause is a limitation on the government so that they cannot and will not be involved in religious matters. Because this clause is in place Pennsylvania had no legal right, according to the plaintiff, to require any activity that insinuates religion. The plaintiff, or…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court case, Zubik v. Burwll is aimed to answer multiple questions. The first question this case aims to answer is does the availability of a regulatory exemption for religious employers regarding the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate eliminate the substantial burden on those organizations’ exercise of their religious freedom? The second question this case will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines satisfy the Religious Freedom Restoration Act’s demanding test for overriding religious objections? Last, the third question this court will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act when the government has not proven that the guidelines…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The word choice, sentence structure, figurative language, and sentence arrangement the author {Kimberly Brubaker Bradley} uses, makes the text journalistic or informal like. When the characters talk, they don't speak formally or with really bad grammar. They talk like normal people would do. Kimberly writes with little figurative language. When she does though, it is relatable to the text, and easy for younger readers to understand.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Chapter 17 Terms

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Also issues on Constitutionality- court declared this act as unconstitutional, holding that the fourteenth amendment gave congress the power to outlaw discrimination by states, but not by private individuals.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law specifically addresses discrimination in the workplace. The case presented relates specifically to section 703 which states it is unlawful to discriminate against an individuals race, color, religion, sex, or national origin ("Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964",2013). The employee is claiming the company was in violation of this section by scheduling him to work on his religious holy day. Yet, the question remains as to whether the company intentionally violated the employee 's religious rights by changing shifts, or was it in response to business growth and…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) speaks about discrimination on the basis of religious beliefs.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Reagan administration agreed with the courts on the decision. It was said that these laws were “perfectly neutral with respect for other religious practices. It neither favors one religion over another nor conveys endorsement of…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The city of Boerne v. Flores case was ruled by the U.S. Supreme Court in the basis that the religious freedom restoration act (RFRA) surpass the powers of the congress on June 25, 1997. The religious freedom restoration act (RFRA) had been enacted in 1993. The claims appraised in the case could not be applied in the states although they were constitutional in regard to the federal actions. The case started in 1993 after archbishop of San Antonio was denied the permit to expand the local Catholic Church at Texas.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plessy lost this case and the court’s decision was based on the Jim Crow South law that stated everybody is “separate but equal”. This decision was based upon how the fourteenth amendment was interpreted and the court looked at it with concern regarding legality rather than social violation. After this case, many people disagreed with the federal government because the…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    render Jim Crow Laws unconstitutional. That decision began an age of Judicial Activism for the…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based on religion. Religious discrimination is treating a person differently because of their religious believes. In this case Elaine Mobley, a member of the nonsectarian Unitarian Universalist Church, can file a legal sue under religious discrimination or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because she was discriminated by employees and her supervisor. They said that she would be “making efforts repeatedly to “save the soul” of a fellow employee” (Neill, 2014, Web). A proven wrongful dismissal will tend to lead to two main remedies: reinstatement of the dismissed employee, and/or monetary compensation for the wrongfully dismissed. In this case the court should look on how Elaine Mobley told her supervisor that she was feeling harassed by her employees, and shortly after that she was fired. In this case the judge should rule in favor of Elaine Mobley, because of what we have of the case it seems that she was being harassed and told her director of division and did nothing but fire her. The employer did in fact discriminate unlawfully, because you cannot force someone to become one of your same religion. It is especially unlawful to leave messages in her desk stating “How can you speak of God and Reject me? I love you and know all about you” as the book stated (Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 7 edition, p. 56).…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An inequitable law should be repealed because it denies citizens their Constitutional rights. The First Amendment of the Constitution grants citizens may rights and freedoms. One of these rights is freedom of religion or lack thereof. The first amendment says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”(U.S Constitution, Amendment I). The Constitution is the supreme law of the United States of America and it protects many of its citizens’ rights.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three branches of government each serve as a crucial aspect to how the United States runs. The Executive Branch houses the president, vice president, and the many cabinet members. The Legislative Branch is made up of Congress, and the Judiciary Branch is made up of the courts. While all three have very different and important roles, the one that has the most power is the Legislative Branch.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most grapes come from cultivars of Vitis vinifera, the common grapevine; and its cultivation began approximately 6000 to 8000 years ago (B) (This et al., 2006). Grapes can be eaten raw and used for making wine, raisins, juices, jellies, vinegars, and seed oils (B). The grapevine has played an essential role in history, religion, and industry worldwide. Archaeological evidence suggests that the first wine production has originated between the Black Sea region and Iran, and by the influence of Roman Empire it was spread to Europe (A). The spread of viticulture to North America at the end of the 19th century was followed by the phylloxera epidemic which destroyed most of the vineyards in Europe (This et al., 2006). Extensive…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays