Preview

What Is The Difference Between The Greeks And Persians

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
939 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Difference Between The Greeks And Persians
The Persian civilization was an empire while the Greek civilization was city states Over 35 million people were ruled by the Persians. Their political system was built on top of the preexisting systems of Mesopotamia. The emperors of the Persian system were only approachable by high class people. The greeks were city states that had about 500 to 5,000 people. The Greeks didn’t build their civilization upon civilizations that existed before them. The Greek’s ideology included equality for their citizens before the law, which made people more content. The participation of people in the political category for Greece was larger than Persia’s. Although the rights for citizenships was only given to upperclassmen at the beginning of Greek history, …show more content…
In addition, more men were allowed access to public office. He, the the tyrants at that time, wanted to break the power of the aristocratic families and he succeeded.More men were also able to afford weapons and equipments. This would allow more men to serve in the city-state armies. Although the Greeks won and the loss for the Persians were embarrassing, the outcome had little impact on the Persian empire. The Persians were now a symbol for authority and the greeks were a symbol for power. The win for the Greeks drove their pride, which also verifies their freedom. The Greek’s win sent them into a fifty year golden era where Greek theaters were formed and large buildings like the Parthenon in Athens were built. Socrates also began his philosopher career. A civil war, known as the Peloponnesian War, took place after the Greco-Persian War happened because Athens wanted more power.The Greeks won again and the fight opened a new way for the Greek city-states to be conquered by Macedonia.Alexander’s conquests caused Greek culture to spread into Mesopotamia, India, and Egypt. New Greek cities were …show more content…
A part of Rome’s political system gave the lower class some protection, which made more people want to support the empire. The moral beliefs, behaviors, and laws of Rome made people stand fr Rome since more and more people agreed with it.Rome’s location in the Mediterranean made the building of the empire easier. Rome’s army was well trained and grew from Italy’s population. Rome had wealth and a large food supply which supported the citizens of Rome.The Chinese empire tried to revive their imperial tradition that already happened during the Shang, Xia, and Zhou dynasties. The process of creating the empire was quicker and easier since they already had something to work off of. It however was still reliant on the Chinese military force which made the creation of the empire brutal. Rome had a evolution from republic to an empire. The Chinese’s transition was faster.Rome had a less centralized political system then China. Both took in religion that was foreign to them. Christianity was taken in by Rome. China took in Buddhism, which came from India.The Roman empire took in more foreign culture and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    While European Rome and Asian Han Dynasty China were unique civilizations in their own ways, they did happen to share a lot of qualities between each other. A couple of the similarities were their monarchy-run governments - both placed a single person (an emperor) in charge of the respective empire, both of them had were originally made up of many different kingdoms in their countries with one ending up controlling the rest, they both used lots of agriculture in their economies, and both Rome and Han China gradually deteriorated after long rules.…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China had some similarities and differences in their foundation. In the eight century B.C.E., Rome began as a small city-state on the western side of Italy. Originally they were a monarchy but in 509 B.C.E. they knocked off the monarchy and made themselves republic. In their republic system, the wealthy class, known as patricians, dominated. The lower class was called plebeians. The Romans had laws that protected the lower class form abuse. The Romans took great pride in their system, believing it gave them more freedom. With this political system, the Romans launched their empire, a process that took more than 500 years. The Chinese were not building a new empire yet they were restoring the old. The Chinese empire started as early as 2200 B.C.E. By 5oo B.C.E. the Chinese state was in shambles which they considered as the warring states, which were seven kingdoms within the Chinese government fighting against each other. China finally reunified in 221 B.C.E. Han China and Imperial Rome are similar because they both flourished at about the same time (200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E.), conquered about the same amount of land (about 1.5 million square miles), and had about the same population (50 to 60 million). The reason for the similarities and differences in the foundation in both of the empires was because Rome was a new empire while the Han dynasty was just restoring the old but they were still the dame due to their similarity in the time era both empires flourished, they occupied a similar area, and they contained a similar population.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aftermath of the fall of Han China was much different than that of Imperial Rome. After Han China collapsed, and the barbarians invaded, the region was in chaos for around 350 years. Despite that, China was reassembled under new dynasties and they remained an empire until the early 20th century. On the contrary, the Roman Empire was broken up and integrated into new civilizations and combined with many other ideals. Nevertheless, the Roman Empire never rose again in any form. The effect of these empires collapse was the biggest difference in the fall of Han China and Imperial Rome.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman and Han Empires were the most powerful empires among the Classical Empires. Between the fifth century B.C.E. and the fifth century C.E., the Roman empire of the Mediterranean and the Han Empire of China were both influential powers of the Classical Asian and Mediterranean worlds. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were similar in their falls because they both fell to nomadic invaders, and because they both fell because of a decline in economic trade. The Han and the Roman Empires were different in their falls because the Han suffered from serious revolts whereas the Romans did not; also the effects of their falls were different because China was able to make a fairly quick comeback whereas Rome was never able to do so.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Han China and Imperial Rome are compared, one can find both similarities and differences in terms of techniques of imperial administration. A similarity would be that both are bureaucracies. However, both are also different. One major difference is that Han China had the civil service exams. They also differed because Han China had a much greater emphasis on religion than the Romans. These differences led to very different futures for the two empires, both of which were among the strongest in the world at the time.…

    • 568 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although both Han China and Imperial Rome had large, long lasting empires with similar economies and some similar policies centralized governments and similar administrative policies regarding land reform, their techniques of imperial administration differed in terms of how it came to be and how emperors ruled.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China are both well recognized empires, known as strong and fairly successful. Although the empires had some differences they also had similarities in their methods of political control. Similarities between these empires include the belief that leaders had connections to God, religious tolerance, and public works provided to citizens. Along with the similarities in political control the differences include Rome having a democracy while China had a centralized bureaucracy, Rome had lesser domestic repercussions while China had harsh punishments, and Rome offered assimilation to become a citizen while China did not need to offer assimilation because it conquered states that were already chinese.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the empires lasted during the same time, they were located on completely different land areas. Rome had the Mediterranean, was hilly, with lots of rivers. Natural protections with their central location, and able to utilize their manpower resources of Italy. While Han China had rivers, plateau, deserts, mountains, was plain-fertile but needed…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some similarities of imperial administration in Imperial Rome and Han China include the general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. Both empires believed in generalization of the people. Yes, they had one ruler, but everyone else underneath the ruler was made equal. Both Imperial Rome and Han China are controlled under one central leader.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparative Rome and Han

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the similarities, they also had many differences in religion. Rome was mainly polytheistic, and strongly believed in and worshipped many gods. In Chinese religions such as Confucianism, there wasn’t much focus on gods but ancestor worship was very important. Another difference was religious tolerance. When Christianity was introduced to Rome, the Romans hated and persecuted the Christians. In China, Buddhism was introduced through the Silk Road. There was a bit discontent from the government and Confucianists but unlike the Christianity, it quickly became popular. Another difference was the effect of religion. In Rome, the emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan and granted tolerance toward Christians. It was finally accepted, but it was a factor to its downfall. In China, Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism made it prosper and all three became important parts of…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China during the time 200 bce. through 200 ce. and Imperial Rome during the time of 31 bce. though 476 ce. had many similarities and differences. Some of the similarities between the two are their religious policies, the significance of their armies, rebelliations from the people, and the role of the emperor. These empires had many differences as well such as the acceptance of outsiders, their influences on other regions, and their philosophies.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman and Han empires were both very powerful, in their own rights. Although their culture and beliefs were very different, their ideology and governments were, at points, very similar. Both empires experienced a rise, plateau, and fall, which eventually changed their entire empires.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, ancient Rome and Han China both shared social views. Male dominance was a big thing for both, as they only cared to produce male offspring and didn't really care much about the women. In Han China it was a bit of a disgrace to produce women offspring; in Rome women were in the same social level as all of the children, everybody under seven-teen years of age. Even-though they both had sort of a sexism society, their paterfamilias were very loyal and respectful. Rome had a lot more slaves then Han China, however they led to an economical downfall in both ancient Rome and Han China.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    China And Rome Dbq Essay

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Though both the Chinese and Roman Empires were huge, wealthy, and powerful, they both had tragic falls. China was destroyed by nomadic invaders, a lack of army, and the influence of Buddhism. Rome, on the other hand was ruined by attacks by other civilizations, the loss of productive members of society, and the influence of Christianity. Both empires suffered from similar ideas, such as religion, or a lack of military, but each idea impacted them in different ways. Though the Chinese and Roman Empire were truly remarkable, like many other ancient empires, they had a devastating…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both were well organized bureaucratic systems. Although Han china was more complex and was based upon Confucianism which identified principles necessary for political order. The Roman Empire was founded upon Roman law and classical learning and had a greater emphasis on law codes, like the twelve tables who established the laws. Thus, Han china’s laws were promulgated by the emperor. Han china rose to success by applying legalism to their government. Which legalism was more strict and prosperous then Rome. Hence why Han china was much more complex than Rome.…

    • 277 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays