The arguement of the author also strongly
The arguement of the author also strongly
Does the authors’ analysis change your mind about the subject in any way? Do you agree or disagree with their analysis? Explain why.…
Fridman develops his argument in "America Needs Its Nerds" by first listing a credible source. He glues the Webster's New World Dictionary definition of geek to how our language and our culture is compared to a freak biting the head off a live chicken." Even people in Harvard are ashamed to admit how much they study.…
The Paper is a record of a collective discussion, notan argumentative essay. The does not, nor does…
Fridman initiates his essay by explaining the denotation of the word geek and the comparing it…
The author is arguing his opinion by giving examples…
The author makes a comparison between source 1, and source 2, Both are emotinal arguments. They…
Today nerds and geeks are being overshadowed and undervalued in America. Society see nerds and geeks as people who are not normal or mainstream. They are not given much respect as many other students in the school. In the passage of, " America Needs Its Nerds." Leonid Fidman uses ethos, pathos, and logos to strengthen his argument.…
Furthermore, the selection refers to “derogatory terms like nerd and geek” that personally affect those at the end of the target. By definition, the term “geek” is recorded as a street performer who entertains the people by biting the heads off of live chickens. How can a student with a driven mindset for knowledge be compared to a freak show? Nerd and geek are used in order to degrade those who achieve success in academics, and make them feel inferior to the “jocks” who are stereotypical to use the phrases. Fridman reminds the reader that “nerds are ostracised while athletes are idolized” (line 17), and there is no shortcutting this accuracy. When the football team wins a game, they are given all the glory-high fives from civilians, pep rallies, parades-however, when is the last time you heard about the destination imagination success? The academic team? The phrase hits home to many students across the nation who continue to receive the short end of the stick, and…
Fridman’s consistent use of intelligent, straight, and disapproving words conveys his point effectively and mockingly with every passing letter. As he is speaking on the importance of nerds, his use of higher-level and well-flowing diction brilliantly puts those who aren’t as smart, but still “better than everyone else” in a situation near equivalent to asking a large woman if she is pregnant and finding that she isn’t. . . You may think you understand something, but the reality of things is very different. Whereas jocks may make fun of people for being weird, smart, and even dumb (how witty of them), their own ignorance – and daresay stupidity – blinds them to the realization that they need nerds. Something Fridman makes comical since these very people might read this paper and not even fully understand it since some of the words are for nerds.…
Hyperboles are used to exaggerate and emphasize how American society treats its intellectuals. Likewise, Fridman uses rhetorical questions to criticize America’s values. He expresses that America needs its intellectually curious individuals, if it wants to remain a superpower. Lastly, logos is used to explain to the reader that intellectuals are viewed as freaks, are not respected, and are paid less than professional athletes. By using these devices, Fridman is successful in developing his…
The restatement of the two argument is particularly powerful. It serves as the conclusion and refreshes the reader on the topic of the article. It also concisely described why Hipp’s argument is…
Though, the audience of this book review may easily identify the content of the book, the author in our point of view, wasn’t able to present a strong argument with regards to the topic…
In his passage about anti-intellectualism in America, Leonid Fridman assesses that the suppression of intellectuals is liable to keep the country from advancing beyond its constrictions of science, technology and education. Fridman intends to persuade the audience to re-evaluate their view of intellectuals, as well as express his distaste for the plethora of social stigma surrounding said intellectuals, by providing examples of anti-intellectualism in American language, in American education, and with comparisons to other societies. Fridman expands on many examples of anti-intellectualism in our society throughout his passage in order to showcase the stigma. One particular instance of his many examples that seemed notably important was how, in the Webster’s New World English Dictionary, it says that the definition of geek is a “Street performer who shocks the public by biting off the heads of live chickens”. With this example, Fridman illustrates the level on which we suppress intellectuals.…
In “Anti-Intellectualism: Why We Hate the Smart Kids”, Grant Penrod makes the argument that academic achievement should be rewarded just as much if not more than athletic achievement. He gives out on the fact that today’s society tends to glorify non-intellectuals, such as athletes and celebrities, while the intellectually skilled individuals get left on the sidelines with little recognition for their accomplishments. The intellectuals, typically seen as “nerds” or “losers “it’s so sad. As Penrod puts it, “the result of anti-intellectualism is a crushing disregard for the lives and achievements of fellow human beings” (Penrod 755). Basically what he is saying is that through these anti-intellectual practices, people seem to be going out of their way to put down other individuals successes. Instead of being seen in a positive light, there is an offensive for intellectuals that have become a big part of our society. Why is this? Perhaps, once again using high school as an example, students who are less academically inclined are jealous of their peers academic successes, or maybe they just simply cannot relate to them. Penrod says: “the trend to dislike intellectuals stems at least in part from an inescapable perception that concern for grades…excludes the coexistence of normal social activity” (Penrod 755). What this essentially means is that among the many ideas of intellectuals is that they are in getting perfect grades, test scores, etc., that they are just nerds who have no social lives. Penrod goes on to say that this false idea leads to an “unbreakable cycle”, because many of these intellectuals are not actually able to make leaps and bounds socially due to the fact that they are excluded from the society. I…
State in your own words two of the author’s leading propositions and list the arguments supporting those propositions.…