Preview

What Is The Nuremberg Trials Fair

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
96 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Nuremberg Trials Fair
After the suicide of Nazi leader Adolf Hitler and the surrender of the Axis Powers on May 8, 1945, World War II had finally been ended and as a result, the Nuremberg trials were made by the Allied forces by global law along with the laws of war to prosecute members of Nazi Germany for playing a big role in war crimes involving the Holocaust. This is very unfair because the Allied Forces had their part in the death of Jews as well as the Nazis, therefore they should have stood in the trial as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At this conference, it was determined that Berlin, the capital of Germany, as well as Germany itself, would be divided into four zones and placed under the control of the United States, France, Great Britain and the Soviet Union. Later, the nation was re-divided into East and West Germany. Following the war, many of the Nazi leaders who worked closely with Hitler were charged and punished for their crimes at the Nuremberg Trials. This set the precedent for the handling of future war crimes. One of the challenges following the war was rebuilding Europe, which was left in shambles both physically and economically after the war. The United States contributed to these efforts by sending more than $13 billion worth of food and other goods to Europe. In order to prevent another world war from occurring, the United Nations was formed to promote worldwide…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty Of Versailles Dbq

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Allies had learned invaluable lessons from the obvious failure of the Treaty of Versailles. While reparations were still severe, the Allied Powers served as conquerors rather than disciplinarians, separating Germany into four military zones, they then stripped it of industry, dismantled the government, and instituted a democratic system. Militarily, the Allies rounded up all German military forces and rendered them inoperative until they could be disarmed. Maritime and aeronautical shipping were all but eliminated and outlined specific orders that would ensure continued control over the region. Another important provision made was the Nuremberg Trials, which allowed the Allied Powers to punish those directly responsible for the…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Second World War, there were many heinous crimes committed. These unforgivable acts are still felt today among the survivors. The war started in 1939, however these crimes originated from as early as 1933. This is the starting point of terrible sequences of events that is known today as the Holocaust. Beginning with what is arguably one of the most notorious concentration camps of the Holocaust, Dachau.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ: Reign of Terror

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages

    They were also unjustified because they were out of control and gave no trial to those who were sent to death. “The tribunal followed a formalized legal procedure, but gradually broke down “(63). They soon after gave in and stopped following their word, stopping all the trials. “The tribunal were out of control and kill thousands of innocents and accused men and women”(63). These…

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What were the results of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and what happened to the Romanov family?…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler Justified Dbq

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People were in denial that they had lost the war, but the Jews were also denied their basic rights. The Nuremberg laws outlawed many basic rights of the Jewish people while the Germans were fine with it because they didn't affect them. For example, Document 1, the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor, outlawed Jewish people marrying German people. “1. Marriages between Jews and citizens of German or kindred blood blood are forbidden. Marriages concluded in the defiance of this law are void, even if, for the purpose of evading this law, they were concluded abroad.” (Nuremberg Laws, 1935). These laws made the Jews living in Germany have little power and stopped them from doing basic things, such as going to school, or even sitting on the same bench as a non-jew. These laws show that the Jews were treated as subhuman and that they were below the normal German citizens. The Germans were happy to be treated as above all else, so this made them support Hitler…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Holocaust, six million Jewish people were murdered by means of gas, cremation, disease, starvation and various other causes. As Wiesel stated in his acceptance speech, the Nazi Party grew stronger due to the silence of the German citizens. However, the German citizens were not the only people to be silent. The United States did not become involved in the war until they were attacked. They were aware of the mass killings, but they chose to ignore them until they were threatened. This proves to the ethics and morality of the people of the United States and Germany. They were aware of the…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trials were a series of military courts, held by the Allied forces of World War II, defendent for the courts were men in the political, military, and economic leadership of the Nazi Germany. The first and best known of these trials was the Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, which was aginst 22 of the most important captured leaders of Nazi Germany. It was held from November 20, 1945 to October 1, 1946. The second set of trials of lesser war criminals was conducted under Control Council Law No. 10 at the US Nuremberg Military Tribunals; among them included the Doctors' Trial and the Judges'…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hitler had taken over, 121 new laws and ordinances were made to make life difficult for German Jews, they were called the Nuremberg laws, and they lasted from 1935-1939. Men were killed off or sent to work, all ages, young and old. Through all the chaos and killing, Gerda Weissman Klein had survived to tell her story about her time during the Holocaust.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During 1940 -1945, when the death camp Auschwitz-Birkenau was operating, the allies (The United States, Britain and Soviets) were well informed about the atrocities occurring at these camps, but failed to send support. World leaders had knowledge about the genocide and mass murder in early 1940s as it began to unfold around the world but did nothing about it. Winston Churchill, and Franklin Roosevelt presented as speech to give a public warning to Germans in 1942 after Germany announced the execution of Jewish civilians, but this was the most support Jews got, as the allies believed winning the war was more important. One key example of this was when Winston Churchill stated in July 1944, that “This was the most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world” after receiving a report on Auschwitz, however little was done by the British Empire to stop the horrific crimes that were occurring at these camps.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Holocaust Dbq

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There have been many major events in the world's history; some are brilliant discoveries, and some are incredibly tragic. One of the biggest tragedies in the world was The Holocaust which took place in Nazi Germany and other territories Germany took over from 1933-1945. The Holocaust was the result of Hitler’s anti-semitism from his belief that the Jewish people were the cause of all of Germany’s problems. Hitler made the Jewish people the scapegoat of all of the country's struggles and with the help of the SS and Nazi army, he was able to almost carry out his “final solution” plan to terminate all the jewish people, resulting in between five million and six million Jews were killed. The Nazi’s thought the Jews were inferior and scapegoated…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, the Nuremberg Trials were a series of trials prosecuting and questioning Nazi war criminals. When Hitler came to power, he created laws persecuting Jews and other enemies of Nazi. These laws provoked the death of 6 million European Jews. In response, the allied leaders of Great Britain, the U.S., and the Soviet Union “issued the first joint declaration officially noting the mass murder of European Jewry and resolving to prosecute those responsible for violence against civilian populations,” (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Holocaust War Crimes

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In order to seek justice for these war crimes, many trials were held. The first declaration officially noting the mass murder of Jews, resolving to prosecute those responsible, was noted on December 17, 1942 by the leaders of the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union (War Crimes Trials). The people responsible for the war crimes were to be sent back to the countries where such crimes haf been committed and judged accordingly to the laws of that nation (War Crimes Trials). Justice was the only reasonable solution to this situation. Many nations which Germany occupied during World War 2 or who collaborated with the Germans in the persecution of certain populations, espically Jews, have also held national trials in the years following World War 2 (War Crimes Trials). The goal of the post war trials was to punish all of the people charged with offenses recognized as crimes in Article 2 of the Control Council of Law no 10 (War Crimes Trials). Due to the heinousness of such crimes, it was vital of authorites to go to such extremes. These post war trials really helped bring peace to many of the victims of the crimes.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At issue was the question of state sovereignty and the fact that the Nazis did not hold a monopoly on racially directed crimes (even if the Nazi goal of complete extermination was at the extreme). The great powers faced a quandary. The atrocities of the Nazis had to be punished. The U.S. was lukewarm to the idea of prosecuting Nazis for crimes committed within Germany's borders. As Justice Robert Jackson, head of the U.S. delegation to the London Conference put it in…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nuremberg Trials

    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages

    More than half a century has passed since the end of World War Two and to this day it is still difficult to fully understand the severity of what was by far the most destructive war in human history. More than sixty million people were killed during World War Two and more than half of those were innocent town’s people. Among the dead were over six million Jews, which was two thirds of the total living race in Europe at the time. Beyond these general statistics were thousands of stories of crimes committed against soldiers and civilians. These crimes against humanity included cases of prisoners of war being murdered, sent to concentration camps and abuse as well as harmless civilians being rounded up and “exterminated” in death camps. At the end of the war, the Allies (USA, France, Britain, and Russia) felt that the Germans had to be held accountable for their inhumane actions and felt justified to punish the Nazis in an international court of law. On November twentieth, 1945 the Nuremberg trials began where twenty one of the top Nazi leaders where being prosecuted for their crimes during the war. All of the Nazi defendants were considered innocent until proven guilty and were allowed to defend themselves against the charges. Some of the defendants such as Alfred Jodl, Wilhelm Keitel and Hans Frank used the defence that they were just following orders. Other defendants like Karl Doenitz and Albert Speer admitted their actions were wrong. Herman Goering believed his actions were for the greater good of Germany. After researching and gaining the knowledge of the Nuremberg Trials I believe that all six of these Nazi leaders are guilty and I think the judges decided on appropriate sentences for each of the accused. All six of these men helped lead the Germans to commit some of the most brutal crimes the world has ever seen and each of them had to face the consequences of their actions.…

    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays