Preview

What Is The Role Of Political Change In The 1800's

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1015 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Role Of Political Change In The 1800's
The 1828 election was unlike any other before it; it introduced lots of things that evolved into what elections are like today, including economic and social changes, who can vote, how many people vote, how candidates portray themselves, and the different backgrounds of the candidates.

In the 1800’s, not many people could vote compared to today. In the elections before the 1828 election, the only ones that could vote were white males who were at least 21 years old, educated, and owned property. If you didn’t meet these qualifications, you couldn’t vote. These criteria changed in the 1828 election; most requirements got dropped, meaning that the majority of white men could vote. In turn, this raised the number of people who voted from 356,038
…show more content…
A significant change in the nation was population, there was a bigger population in general, but the western states gained more population and got more political power. Furthermore, there was universal suffrage for white males, and there was a notion that anyone could become president. The campaign was for the popular vote and electors were chosen by the popular vote. Most of the economic changes that happened have continued and grown and have a lasting effect on today’s elections. Along with these social changes, there were also some economic changes that occurred in the nation. The invention of the cotton gin substantially increased the amount of cotton that could be produced. This led to much more slaves needed to maintain the cotton fields, and more cloth making mills in the north. New canals and roads were allowing easier transportation of goods to the northern part of the nation, thus increasing the wealth in those …show more content…
The biggest difference between the 1828 election campaigns and the ones before it was the introduction of ‘mudslinging.' Mudslinging is when a candidate purposefully does things that hurt the other candidate's campaign, like spreading bad rumors and trash talking them. John Adams himself didn’t participate in mudslinging Jackson, but his supporters did. They spread bad rumors about Jackson's mom and wife and called Jackson a murderer for his brawls and duels. Jackson was even worse than Adams followers though. Jackson attacked Adams by calling him a corrupt aristocrat and attacking him about his large salary over the years. He also accused him of gambling in the White House because he bought a chess board and a billiards table. Aside from the mudslinging, Jackson presented himself as the common man to gain more voters, and both candidates had campaign songs and slogans. Previous candidates didn’t have anything to do with these new campaign techniques, they were more, ‘civilized,' elections you could say. These campaign techniques greatly affected how elections go today; the ‘mudslinging’ has gotten progressively worse since then, with the U.S.’s last election having lots of these techniques implemented by both

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jackson’s sweeping presidential victory in 1828 represented the political triumph of the New Democracy, including the spoils-rich political machines that thrived in the new environment. Jackson’s simple, popular ideas and rough-hewn style reinforced the growing belief that any ordinary person could hold public office. The “Tariff of Abominations” and the…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6. 1824 marked end of Era of good feelings. Jackson and Clay-West, Adams-North, and Calhoun-South. Jackson won most electoral and popular votes but Adams was chose by the House of Reps. Known as CORRUPT BARGAIN. Jackson furious, set stage for 1828 election.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Jackson’s campaign strategy was mudslinging… while he defamed the personal character of his political adversaries, his fellow Democratic leaders organized rallies and barbecues to attract and mobilize voters.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the years progressed from 1815-1840 the voter participation was increasing drastically. As seen in document A, in 1824 there was a 26.9 percent of voter participation which tripled in a matter of 16 years. After the controversial “corrupt bargain” of 1824, voters were determined to have their voices heard in order to bring who they truly wanted into power. In addition to the rise of participation, the percentage of state allowing the common voters themselves to chose presidential electors climbed to almost 100%. Andrew Jackson assisted the increase of voters, he removed the requirements and opened up the voting pool to more common folk; this gave the common people more power equal to that of the aristocracy.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The electoral system in the early nineteenth century was radically different from the parliamentary democracy we have today. The system was not representative of the population in terms of wealth or region, and elections were open to corruption. Before 1832, just ten per cent of British adult males were eligible to vote – and this portion of the population was the richest.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adams and Jackson both ran for president again in the Election of 1828, which was also known as a revolution. Jackson and his followers had a new campaign tactic, which was accusing Adams' wife of being born out of wedlock. Adams accused Jackson's wife of adultery. This election attracted a lot of interest and had three times as many voters as the Election of 1824. Jackson won and became president in 1829.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson ‘s political style and interest in popular concerns constituted a challenge for those on the opposite side of the political spectrum in his time. Indeed, their reaction to his movement was to attack it, both rhetorically and through the formation of an entirely new political party: the Whig Party. For example, critiquing the rhetorical style of the Jacksonians, Adams wrote in his diary that they were “skunks of party slander.” Generally speaking, he viewed Jacksonian politics as less than palatable. After all, his disdain for Jackson was clearly evident in his decision to boycott Jackson’s accepting of an honorary degree from Harvard University in 1833.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Such strategies were employed to make sure that the candidate would get elected; the election of 1828 was the first election in which the masses determined the winner. Andrew Jackson’s, also known as the “old Hickory”, truly embodied the notion of the changing campaigning especially when his inauguration was consummated with the participation of rowdy crowds. As Jackson entered the White House so did a swarm of friends, neighbors, and supporters thus critics were quick to state that the “reign of King Mob” had commenced.(I) Political campaigning in the 1840s only further demonstrated the reforming freedom politics used; almanacs in this case were used to gather an emotional if not logical appeal to the public in favor of William…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1800’s were an era of vast political campaigns. People including John Adams, Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, William Harrison, and John Tyler were all important Presidents during the Second Part System period. People became more implicated and the elections became more aggressive. Participation in political campaigns and elections in the U.S. evolved between 1815 and 1840 from events that pushed America toward a Democratic nation.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Progessive Era DBQ

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Little was changed for African-Americans in the period 1900-1920. The limited effect of reformers can be seen as well in the drop of voting. In 1900, 73 percent of eligible voters voted, while in 1920, only 49 percent voted (Document J). This drop is indicative of the voter's enthusiasm at the ballot boxes.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the election of 1824, candidates John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, and Andrew Jackson did not gain enough electoral votes to win. In accordance with the constitution, the election was settled in the House, and to the people’s dismay, Henry Clay helped John Quincy Adams gain enough votes to become President, in what what later known by the Democrats as the “corrupt bargain.” A war hero and aristocrat from the agrarian state of Tennessee who liked to chew tobacco and duel with pistols, Andrew Jackson was particularly livid about the results of this election, considering he had won the popular vote. Andrew Jackson and his party, the Democratic Party, won in the election of 1828 and went on to radically alter the principles and functions of democratic government by championing the “common man” and taking a brutal stance towards the Native Americans.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political elements played an enormously important role during the time period 1820-1840. Between the presidency of both Thomas Jefferson in 1800 and Andrew Jackson in 1828, American culture and politics were transformed as democracy appeared to suffuse every aspect of them. The growth of democracy caused a significant political consequence; the expansion of suffrage to include virtually all men by the removal of property requirements. The removal of property requirements proved to be controversial as it became a debated issue among many (Keene, 228). Many states were expanding suffrage to non-property owning white men, but stripped away voting rights from property owning African Americans as well as making new restrictions on them. For…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1928 American Election

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    AP American History October 21, 1997 The year of 1828 was a tumultuous year in American politics. It so happened that it was a presidential election year. The election of 1828 was different from any other presidential election up to that point. The election not only set a precedent, but was also one of the bitterest in American history. Out of all the elections up to that point, it had all the makings of a present-day campaign. The two modern aspects evident in the campaign were horrific mudslinging and the choice of presidential electors by a popular vote. The two men running for the office of president that year were the incumbent, John Adams, and the once-defeated Andrew Jackson. John Adams ran as a National Republican, later to be known as the Whigs. Adams had the support of the respectable Secretary of State, Henry Clay, but he did not have the support of his own Vice-President, John C. Calhoun. Calhoun was very powerful in the politics of that time period. He threw his support in favor Jackson because he could tell that Adams and the Republicans wanted Henry Clay to succeed Adams in the election of 1832. William H. Crawford, presidential hopeful in 1824, also gave his support to Jackson. However, the most important man to lend his backing to Jackson was Martin Van Buren, because he could tell that Jackson was going places. Jackson was running as a Democratic Republican. Because the Democrats are widely known to be the party of the common man, Jackson could use the theory of us against them. The Democrats also gained the support of the newly formed Workingman's Party. When Adams had beaten Jackson for president four years before, the Jacksonians protested that there was a corrupt bargain between Clay and Adams. This came about because once the vote went to the House of Representatives, Clay, a candidate, threw his support in favor of Adams. Once in office, Adams made Clay Secretary of State. Throughout Adams' administration and the campaign, the Jacksonians…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the election of 1824, Jackson ran against John Quincy Adams. On election day, Jackson won the most popular votes, but no candidate won a majority in the Electoral College. Adams eventually won the presidency and appointed Clay, his former adversary, the secretary of state because Clay got his supporters to back Adams. This was a major act of corruption, and made Andrew Jackson and his supports very mad. In 1828, Jackson ran against Quincy Adams again. This time, Jackson wanted revenge because he felt he was cheated out of the last election. Jackson…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the election of 1828 the election was a very chaotic event in history. Both candidates known as John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson were very far from alike. Adams was the son of our nation’s second president while Jackson was a world national hero from the Battle of New Orleans. The voting changed tremendously over the years. In the 1800’s elections it was only white educated men who could vote, then it changed to all white men. Over the decades it has changed to everyone can vote that is at least 18 years of age and a American citizen. In 1828 election, there was around 1.2 million popular votes casted. Before this election there was around 100,000 popular votes total before all changed. In the 2016 election there was around 129 million if not more votes casted. I believe the economy had changed in a huge way from before 1828 to 1828. There were lots of…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays