What raised my interest in Both the film “The conformist” and the article by Walter Benjamin “The Work of Art in the Age of its Mechanical Reproduction”, is the reference to the concept of “Normality”. Obviously, what was once “normal” is not considered as such now days. The inconsistence of what that term means, is what creates the paradox in the importance society grants it. “Normality” is a concept that contains a human necessity which is communicated through all walks of life. Whether in politics, art, literature, people find their way of expressing their need to be “normal”, to belong. The protagonist of the movie, Clarici, aspires to be defined by society as a normal man with a normal home and a normal life, he aspires to that, because all his life …show more content…
This is what Sartre referred to as the “hell of other people”, our constant need of being approved is also our torture. This is the need that brought people to join the fascism and other political movements of the time. The individual basically decays in the mass culture because of the constant need to feel a part of something. At the end of the movie, when the fascist dictatorship falls, the definition of normal changes as well, leaving Clarici lost and alone at the final scene. The irony is that he seemed just as lost when surrounded by a crowded circle of people in a party, for he does not really feel as one of them. There is no coincidence in the fact that the time of the mechanical reproduction, as referred to in the article, is the same time in which rose the totalitarian regimes. Benjamin raises the connection between the process of technology development, the political processes of the time, and the different art