Preview

What Is a Case Brief

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1404 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is a Case Brief
What is a Case Brief?

A case brief is a condensed, concise outline-form summary of a court opinion. Hence, the term “brief.” It is generally used for more efficient self-study (it’s easier and more simple than re-reading a 100-page long case every time you want to refresh your memory about the case). It is also used to present the case to others (it’s easier and more simple than reading a 100-page long case verbatim). In other words, a case brief boils down a court opinion to the key elements and discusses the essence of the court’s opinion. These basic elements are the facts of the case, the particular legal issue that is at question in the case, the specific legal rule of law that is applicable to the case, the application of that rule of law to the facts of the case, and then the court’s holding/conclusion. With the exception of the specific rule of law (which should almost always be quoted), the case brief should be a summary and paraphrasing of the court’s opinion in your own words. This forces you to understand the court’s opinion much more deeply. In this course, I highly encourage you to study together regarding reading and understanding of the cases; however ***PREPARATION OF YOUR FINAL CASE BRIEF MUST BE YOUR OWN INDIVIDUAL WORK***.

Model Case Brief Template and Sample:

Case: Name of the case, (and year of the decision).

Facts: Who are the parties to the lawsuit, what is their dispute, and how did they get to the Supreme Court? In your own words, only include the few important facts necessary to understand the case; e.g. the time of day a defendant was arrested is usually not important, etc.

Issue: What is the basic legal question regarding what specific provision of law that is to be decided in the case?

Holding: What is the majority’s basic answer to the basic legal question in the case. Also include the vote count: majority/plurality—concurrence(s)—dissent(s)

***Majority Opinion Reasoning: What is the majority’s explanation why it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Title of Case: Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC, Petitioner v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., et al. 128 S. Ct. 761 (2008)…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3)Did the court of appeal agree (uphold or affirm) the trial court’s ruling or did the court of appeal disagree (overturn or remand) the trial court’s ruling?…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: In 1998, investigative reporting team, Jane Akre and her husband Steve Wilson, brought suit against their employer WVTV, a subsidiary of Fox TV, under violation of Florida’s whistle-blower statutes. They argued that the station had terminated their employment under grounds of retaliation because the team refused to suppress and distort the contents of a story regarding the controversial Bovine Growth Hormone in Florida’s cattle. Additional claims also brought forth included declaratory relief and breach of contract. After a four-week trial, a jury found against Wilson on all of his claims. Akre decided to drop allegations concerning declaratory relief and the court allowed for continuance based on her whistle-blower claims. The jury granted a monetary award of $425,000 in damages to Akre based on retaliation claims established by whistle-blower statute.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The discovery of facts that demonstrate that a valid warrant was unnecessarily broad does not retroactively invalidate the warrant.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ANALYSIS: In general, the state’s judicial viewpoint as to how firmly the testator must comply with pertinent statutes varies. Common law required total compliance with procedures. Some states require total compliance but current trends seem to require only substantial…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case brief

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issues: 1) Whether the district court erred in concluding that hay is not a “product “for purposes of a strict liability in tort cause of action. 2) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings negligence claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses, thus no duty of care existed. 3) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings’ breach of contract claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses. 4) Whether the District Court erred in imposing discovery sanctions against the Rothings. 5) Whether the District Court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to Kallestad and denying the Rothings a hearing in respect to the calculation of attorney’s fees. (₱3-7)…

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Now look at Question 2 (p. 71) and pick either b, c, or d to answer. Explain your answer using legal terms and concepts from this week's readings.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: Maryland police arrested a man named Alonzo Jay King, in 2009 for first and second degree assault charges and booked into the Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where booking personnel took a cheek swab (“buccal swab”) to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA collection Act. The swab was matched up to an unsolved 2003 rape case. The police had collected the 2003 DNA sample from the rape victim who underwent a sexual assault forensic exam. A police detective presented the matching 2009 and 2003 DNA to a grand jury, the grand jury indicted King for first-degree rape. Later in 2009, the detective obtained a search warrant and collected a second DNA sample from King that also matched the 2003 sample.…

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comm/215

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Read the case once for familiarity with the overall situation, background, and characters involved, noting issues that you think may be important. Read the case again, and highlight all relevant facts. Make sure you understand the situation and have all the facts. Make notes about issues, symptoms of problems, root problems, unresolved issues, and the roles of key players. Watch for indications of issues beneath the surface.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 4 Brownforman

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) Why is Brown forman considering buying Southern Comfort? In your answer consider the strategic motives of Brown and the arguments in favour of and against the acquisition.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Landmark Case Evaluation

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fill in the notes for the landmark case you selected to connect with your topic in the previous lessons. You may use the official court documents for the case and articles written about the case to fill in the required information below.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the renowned Supreme Court Case of Jackson vs. Birmingham Board of Education, the rule of law was held to be that retaliating against a person because he has complained of being discriminated on the grounds of sex falls under a branch of intentional sex discrimination, which is encompassed by Title IX, Education Amendments of 1972. This was an important case with respect to intentional sex discrimination and never before had such principle of law been enunciated by the Judiciary.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Brief

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (sexual) with her and her friends (girls of younger age) and how he would like to…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In all democratic countries, an important segment of administrative process is delegated legislation. The great increase in delegated legislation in modern times is due to several factors.1 Though law-making is the primary function of legislature, yet in no country does the legislature monopolise the entire legislative power. It shares the same with executive. No statute has been passed today by a legislature which does not confer some legislative power on the Administration.…

    • 6376 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays