What Role Does Exoneration Play In The Criminal Justice System

Since 1989 the way cases are handled have changed. Exonerations have provided a different outlook with how the major players in the court system recognize the Criminal Justice System. Also the way the public perceives the system has also been influenced due to exonerations. Influences such as reality shows, movies, and dramatic television can implement the way society portrays exonerations. Several states have created laws that allow certain individuals to obtain information about DNA analysis, innocent programs to investigate convicted offenders that are thought to be innocent and law enforcement reforms. () Since the passing of the Innocence Protection Act in 2004, encouraging DNA testing after conviction, individuals among the legal and science fields have
Eyewitness testimony accounted for a majority of the convicted while others contained forensic evidence such as fingerprints, blood evidence, and hair comparison. A small percentage accounted for informant testimony which were found to be inaccurate. When pertaining to the court of appeals results showed that defective evidenced was not reviewed effectively. Consequently the convictions that were reversed only accounted for 14% with almost half consisting of actual inaccuracy. When reviewing the case at the appellate level justifying guilt or innocence is at the highest regard. Unfortunately this can often be difficult when having to make such a ruling while also deciding if an error exists. Defendants that pursued the appellate process were seldom successful challenging innocent claims. Due to the expense and difficulty of challenging the evidence. Convictions that did go to appeal for eyewitness identification were not reversed. Cases pertaining to federal claims did not proceed to appeal, even if they were innocent. Also defendants that gave false confessions only half actually raised a challenged, but none acknowledged a