Preview

What Should Be Done with the Canadian Senate?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1005 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Should Be Done with the Canadian Senate?
What Should Be Done With the Canadian Senate? Friday, 9 December 2011

The Canadian Senate has a large role in the Canadian Government. Regardless of the fact that many Canadian’s believe that the Senate should be abolished, I believe that the Senate plays a large role in Canadian order, they are the final stepping-stone for each law passed in Canada. But I do believe the Senate must reconsider and change a select few rules and qualifications for being a senator. I will emphasize and expand my argument on those points in this essay.

The book “How Parliament Works” by: Bejermi, John, Published in 2000 describes the legislative branch of the Canadian government, and explains how the Canadian Senate has 105 seats in the Canadian Parliament, and each Canadian Senator is recommended through the Canadian Prime Minister, and is appointed through the Governor General who represents the Queen. The Legislative Branch is very professional and in great order, but there are two things that I feel should be changed. The first thing to be reconsidered is the appointment of the Senators through Prime Minister Steven Harper. I believe that the Canadian Senate’s required qualifications should be changed. In order for you to be elected you must be over the age of thirty to get elected by the Governor General as a Senator, and to serve the Government of Canada.

The Canadian Parliament is divided into various branches, the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch, both of which are represented by the Queen who in turn is represented by the Governor General. The Executive branch represents the Prime Minister and his Cabinet, and The Legislative represents the House of Commons and the Senate. The Parliament of Canada has three branches, The Queen who appoints a Governor General to represent the Queen on her behalf, The House of Commons and then The Senate. The House of Common’s is the lower house of Parliament, and The Senate is the Upper half of the Canadian Parliament.



Bibliography: By: Aaron Serruya Friday, December 9, 2011 * http://www.mapleleafweb.com/features/canadian-senate-role-powers-operation#powers * http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2010/07/09/f-senate-background.html * http://www.parl.gc.ca/About/Senate/Today/sens-e.html * http://www.parl.gc.ca/About.aspx?Language=E * http://www.law.ualberta.ca/centres/ccs/issues/thecanadiansenatepastpresentandfuture.php * http://www.ndp.ca/press/canada-s-senate-second-thoughts-about-sober-second-thought * http://www.parl.gc.ca/About/Senate/FAQJuniorVersion/brochure-e.htm#q2

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Senate may have been critical and a good idea when Canada was first developing however, today the Senate has no real purpose. The leaders need reminder that the Constitution does not belong to the fender and provincial governments but to the people of Canada. The Senate does not represent all provinces equally, with BC, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba having 6 seats each, compared to Ontario and Quebec who have 24 seats each.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Early election calls are made in complete confidence and in complete vigilance of the current Prime Minister’s reputation among his people. When Prime Minister Harper called an early election in 2015 it was because he believed the Conservatives could win. Through the use of new legislation and strict, strategic planning, Harper organized a situation in which it seemed unlikely the Conservative’s would lose. This paper will answer how Prime Minister Harper took into account the constraints included within the Parliamentary and First-Past-The-Post electoral system, and how he used them both for and against the Conservative Party in his electoral campaign. The essay also definitively answers how the 2015 federal election would have differed in…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Trudeau’s essay to Francois Rocher’s The Quebec-Canada Dynamic or the Negation of the Ideal of Federalism, there are both similarities and differences in their construction. Rocher, states that the interpretation of the direction of the Canadian federalism greatly depends on the origin of scholar who writes it (312). Quebec scholars, argue that the system has forgotten its designed purpose and in turn aims to centralize power within federal authority (Rocher 312). While English speaking Canadians focused on: the links between federalism and democracy in respect to reducing tyrannical behaviour, the degree to which governments have created public policies to address citizen issues (Rocher 312). Additionally, Rocher, uses specific documents…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canadian Prime Minister

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Globalization means that Canada is playing an increasingly important role in other countries through foreign policies. Therefore, foreign leaders are providing additional checks and holding the Prime Minister responsible for the decisions they make (Baker, 2014). The media provides important checks and balances to the office of the Prime Minister through dissemination and interpretation of public information besides questioning government decisions. Enshrining public service by the laws and constitution by establishing the office of the Prime Minister reducing the public officers appointed by the Prime Minister will help reduce the powers of the Prime Minister. In addition, the parliament should be empowered through transfer of former Crown powers currently vested in the office of the Prime Minister (Axworthy,…

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Canadian Senate Essay

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Canadian Senate has often been referred to as the sober second thought. The house of commons was originally set up to have two chambers, the upper and the lower, to carefully decide Canadian laws. The Senate, in the upper house, reviews proposed legislation and ultimately decides whether a bill becomes a law. They are responsible for protecting the interests of Canadians, in all regions, and of all minorities.1 Recently however, there has been a big concern for more accountability. Many…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1867, the foundations of Canadian federalism was established with colonies agreeing to be “federally united”("Intergovernmental Affairs - Intergovernmental Affairs") As a result of the agreement, Canadian federal system is divided into two levels of government, federal and provincial, with corresponding divisions in legislative responsibilities and powers (Leach 1984) The federal level of government has control over matters related to national defence, foreign policy, banking, criminal law, as well as Aboriginal affairs ("The Division of Powers") In contrast, the provincial and territorial governments oversee property and civil rights, hospitals, prisons, education, and direct taxation (“The Division of Powers). Since…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HomeAbout ParliamentSenateResearch and EducationPlatypus and Parliament: The Australian Senate in Theory and Practice3. The electoral and party systems…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This can be seen as a disadvantage for the liberal government as it is necessary for the government to stick to their word and give the people the promise they were given before coming into power. The amendment of the bill must take place along with modifications being made to the cabinet or construction of a policy or law. This will be a step forward for the government and its people. So how does a bill get drafted and who all has the powers during the process? Keeping in mind that the lawmakers in Canada are the cabinet ministers, the Prime Minister is considered to be the chief lawmaker. Similarly the final verdict on the creation of policies and bills before the legislature votes will also be conducted by the Prime Minister. Since the Prime Minister is the chief maker, the cabinet ministers are appointed by him. Bureaucrats in Canada are given an influential power in drafting bill proposals for their respective…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socials

    • 4464 Words
    • 20 Pages

    A description of the powers of the provincial and national legislatures as well as their parts and authority.…

    • 4464 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Canada is a constitutional monarchy; this means that the powers of the monarchy in Canada are limited by the Constitution. Our monarch is now Elizabeth II, who is also the Queen of the United Kingdom. As our Queen does not live in Canada, she appoints, under the advice of our Prime Minister, a Governor General to represent her authority in Canada. There is a great debate among Canadians, on if they really need a constitutional monarchy. The fact is Canada does need a monarch.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, in Representative Democracy an MP must represent his/her constituency. They also must debate issues, attend caucus meetings and meet with researchers, media, special-interest groups, etc. Thirdly there is Constitutional Monarchy. In this both the French and English Fathers of confederation agreed to remain a monarchy. Also, the monarch is the “head of state” in Canada and the monarch does not rule.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first of the four systems I will analyze is the current method of voting in Canada – First Past the Post (FPTP). Named as a reference to horse racing, FPTP voting systems elect candidates simply by who got the most votes in an electoral riding. FPTP has many distinct advantages; it provides voters with a simple and easy to understand voting system, it often gives way to majority governments (Reynolds, 2003, pp. 28) which allows for the easy passing of legislation, and perhaps most importantly, gives voters a clear link between themselves and Parliament, in the form of their MP. However, many notable disadvantages exist in FPTP systems. Primarily, the results of a FTPT system rarely accurately reflect the wishes of the voters. Because a…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Canadian Monarchy

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    More attention needs to be on the part that Monarchies have played regarding the evolution of Canadian democracy. Many Canadians tend to forget the importance of the Crown, though they are not to blame as it is a subject hardly heard of or spoken about in school curricula and media outlets. For five centuries, the Crown has been a symbol of strength in Canada. With an extremely stable and responsible government, the Crown’s involvement is disregarded and forgotten. According to many polls, majority of the Canadians who are aware of the Canadian Monarchy wish to abolish it completely and would rather have a head of state from within Canada but, “Monarchy advocates argue for its continued relevance in parliamentary function and as a symbol of…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once the government is elected, they begin governing the country. This process includes appointing the Senate and working with the House of Commons to figure out what else our great country needs. This includes making laws for the benefit of everyone in Canada. In order to do so, the bill (proposed law), must be passed through the House of Commons twice, where it is reviewed, and if needed, revised. Afterwards, it must pass through the senate, after which it becomes a law. This makes sure the law is fair and it is a viable law to be…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dewan Negara Today

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Today, based on article 45, the ratio of state senators to Appointed senators is 26 to 44. It is obvious therefore that the safeguard as envisaged by the Reid Commission to act as a restraint upon the legislative power of amendment has been deprived of its effectiveness. It can be queried whether the amendment are contrary to the recommendations of the Reid Commission, which stated:‘Amendments should be made by Act of Parliament provided that an Act to amend the Constitution must be passed in each House by a majority of at least two-thirds of the members voting. In this matter the House of Representatives should not have power to overrule the Senate. We think that this is a sufficient safeguard for the States because majority of members of the state will represent the States.’…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays