Preview

What They Fought For Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
497 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What They Fought For Summary
James M. McPherson, What They Fought For, 1861-1865 (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Publisher, 1994; reprint, Logan: Perfection Learning Corporation, 2013). First thing’s first, anyone who encounters this wonderfully constructed book, What They Fought For, by James M. McPherson, must acknowledge his great work. McPherson is one of the few historians worth reading; this is coming from a Kinesiology major who wants little to nothing to do with historians. I strongly believe that this marvelous piece of art work has no flaws or weaknesses, yet has many strong points.
Chapter 1: "The Holy Cause of Liberty and Independence" This first entry into the book showcases the side of the southern Confederate armies, who were comparing the Civil War to the Revolutionary War. They saw their enemies, the Northern Yankees, as nothing more than tyrants trying to oppress the south. Just as the British had done to the colonists a century and a half ago. This gave them a "holy cause of southern freedom", a reason to step into the shoes of their famed forefathers and once again fight for their liberties and constitutional rights.
Chapter one also gives acounts of Confederates lives through letters and journals they wrote in during the Civil War. These letters told
…show more content…
One side wanted to keep it and the other wanted to destroy it. Chapter three delves on both sides, and their opinions on the already touchy subject. The Confederates felt it was their god-given right to have slaves, the superior controlling the weak. The North wanted to abolish slavery because it went against the Constitution. But letters show that some of the Yanks felt it was the only way to defeat the south, so they could really care less. Abraham Lincoln knew though, that the only way to end the war and bring the United States of America back together again, was to end slavery and free the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Civil War Essay

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The controversy surrounding slavery between the North and South was crucial. The North did not want to have slavery because it was evil and cruel, but the South wanted slavery because it was their way of making money in the economy. Northerners had wanted to get rid of slavery, but Southern states seceded, leading to the Civil War. During the Civil War, in late January of 1863, President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed slaves in the Confederate states. Freedmen were allowed to join the Union army as shown in Document 5. After the Union won the Civil War, the 13th amendment was issued, abolishing slavery in…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    5. Keith D. Dickson. The Civil War for Dummies. (Wiley Publishing Inc. 2001), 158 – 159.…

    • 4616 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As long as man has had the ability to think for himself, there has been conflict and war. Wars are waged by the rich and powerful, but fought by the poor masses who march, inexorably into the meat grinder. The question of “why do soldiers fight?” arises when looking at the study of warfare. What compelled the hoplite from Sparta, the foot soldier in Napoleon’s Grand Army, the American Infantryman on Omaha Beach, or the Army Ranger in Baghdad to willingly enlist and fight for their cause? The most devastating war in American history was by far the Civil War, claiming more American lives in four years than all other American wars (except World War I and II) combined. What is it that made these hundreds of thousands of men and women abandon their homes and fight against the nation that their forefathers had fought to gain the independence of not a century before. Many scholars believe that slavery, “states rights”, and freedom were the driving factor in these soldier’s minds. However, there was far more than simple ideology that drove these soldiers to Bull Run, Shiloh, Gettysburg, and Appomattox. Other factors that drove these soldiers into service were a sense of patriotism, their comrades in arms, the need to prove themselves, religion, and the defense of freedom and property to name a few. In For Cause and Comrades by James M. McPherson, McPherson argues that ideology plays a major role in why soldiers choose to fight, but in the heat of battle, ideology is forgotten and the aforementioned reasons become a significant reason as to why they choose to stay.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This book follows differing social structures within The Confederate States of America and how those clashing cultures led to multiple changes of strategy in the mountain regions of the Confederacy. All of these combined factors led to multiple tragic events within the Confederacy. The main social groups that are discussed in the book are Rural and Urban Confederates, Confederate Mountaineers, and Unionist. It is important to understand each of the different social groups before a full social analysis can be conducted. Once the social aspect of the mountain regions is understood, the specific strategies used by both the Union and the Confederacy can be discussed.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Most people say there are two sides to every story, but there can only be one side to the story of people, being denied as to having equal rights, no matter their color or creed. It 's only reasonable to believe that to be true to this principle, slavery had to be abolished. The fact that many slave owners were prestigious people in history such as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and other founding father acknowledges the consequences slavery America 's moral history, while illustrating how difficult it might be to conform to the social standards in that era while defending slavery as a necessary evil. Abraham Lincoln’s stance on slavery remained one of the central issues in American history at the time. Around the period when Lincoln delivered his Emancipation Proclamation, many debates for this decree were being perpetuated by both black and white abolitionist. The brutal disagreement would tear apart the North and the South states which was carried to its fullest extent in the United States in the years before and during the Civil War.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sherman's March

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: McPherson, J. (1988). The battle cry of freedom: The Civil War era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    South vs. South

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Bibliography: Freehling, William W. The South vs. the South: How Anti-Confederate Southerners Shaped the Course of the Civil War. New York: Oxford UP, 2001. Print.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There were two perspectives from this stand point, one was that in the South slavery had become so economically involved in the U.S. that getting rid of it would upset to the economy to the point of collapse if not for its industry and the labor force it commanded. In the North slavery was thought to degrade labor, inhibited economic development, discouraged education, and engendered a domineering master class determined to rule the country in the interests of the wealthy in the South. Southerners were afraid of losing control of its states to the North and were looking to leave the union. The South was not depended on the North but the North was surely dependent on the South and the economic fruit that it provided the country as a whole. There were religious, political, and moral conflicts that were justified from both perspectives, while the North was looking to Unite the country, the south was looking to protect the state’s rights that they believe was being threatened by the federal government with the polices that they had in place with Western expansion and class tensions because of what John Calhoun stated in his speech before congress, “destroy it [slavery] would be to destroy us as a people.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For Abraham Lincoln the link between the civil war and slavery was really saving the union. His intention was to save the union at all costs, he was for keeping slaves if the union could be saved or he was for anti slavery as long as the union was saved. His view is believed to have been for the slaves and he is very much admired for it; his intent was only to save the union. The slave’s freedom just so happen to be part of the civil war fight. Lincoln wanted to save the union with keeping slavery or without it.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper I will discuss four points concerning the civil war in detail. The first issue discussed will be Professor McPherson's arguments in the text Ordeal by Fire and whether Antietam and Emancipation, Gettysburg, Vicksburg, and Chattanooga, represent the three critical turning points in the Civil War. Second, I will rank the three points from greatest to least in terms of their importance on the Civil War. Third, I will add a fourth event I feel was significant to the turning of the war.…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery is the central conflict in which northern and southern states disagree whether or not to abolish it. Frederick Douglass wrote, “The fact that this is a slaveholder's rebellion and nothing else - all point out that slavery as the thing to be struck down, as the best means of the successful and permanent establishment of peace and prosperity of the nation.” There were many factors that resulted in the uprising of the Civil War, but disagreement over slavery was the main one. Without slavery, our nation would finally establish unity and peace.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Technology.

    • 1025 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many technological advancements were implemented during the Civil War. Some of these include the introduction of the ironclad to naval warfare. The use of the railroad to speed armies and supplies around the country, high speed communication via the telegraph, the use of rifles that would change tactical warfare forever and the introduction of new medical practices and ambulance corps.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Confederate Reckoning: Power and Politics in the Civil War South. Harvard University Press,…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Civil War is probably the most horrific episode in American history. The two belligerents of the war were the Union army, comprised of the northern states, and the Confederate army, comprised of the southern slave states which had voted to secede from the Union. In essence, the North did not want the South to secede from the Union because the North relied on the South for agriculture. On the other hand, the South wanted to secede because they had grown tired of the federal government intervening in their states’ affairs; they were concerned about maintaining their states’ rights, as well as their slavery-driven economy.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays