To begin with, Shays and his followers were freedom fighters because the government was unlawful to farmers. According to Abigail Adams, the farmers were being treated “differently” because they had to pay taxes, which they couldn't afford unlike the wealthy who had a lot of money. The lower class was unable to pay taxes, even if they had their own land/property and participated in the war. According to Daniel Gray, instead of helping out the farmers who risked their lives during war, the money from taxes made the rich get richer. Based on the evidence presented the followers of Shay were freedom fighters because they were being treated unfairly compared to the wealthy just because they didn’t have as much as money. …show more content…
According to Daniel Gray, law enforcement had too much power due to the Riot Act. Basically the Riot Act gives unlimited power to peacekeepers and the law is if there are 12 protesters police are allowed to shoot. The actions of law enforcement can be motivated by their own thoughts and beliefs about a certain person. Based on what Gray stated, peacekeepers had too much power in their hands, which they took advantage