What Was The Force Of Unity In Italy In The 19th Century

This definition of nationalism describes well that it could be a heavy potential force of unity or disunity. Nationalism helped merge politically divided nations by allowing them to create ideas that worked for both of them. A community that showed nationalism type qualities was Cavour. They helped to establish banks, factories, and railroads and improved trade with other countries such as the Netherlands, Germany, and Switzerland. These nationalistic type qualities were a force of unity because it brought these countries together. Otto von Bismarck shows these types of qualities as well. However, he used war to consolidate his realm. The series of wars that he creates turns it a powerful German Empire, which then leads to even more unity within that
empire. The social and political movement known as Risorgimento consolidated different states of the Italian peninsula into the single state of the Kingdom of Italy in the 19th century.
This movement is one example of how a movement that also shows nationalism characteristics can create unification among Italy. The Congress of Vienna and the end of Napoleonic rule lead to a nationalism increase for Italy. This increase brought unity because the people starting feeling as though they had a say in what was happening instead of having one person make all the decisions. This group and the end of this rule demonstrates how there can be a unity increase coming from any sort of source. Finally, in March 1861, a parliament of all of Italy except Rome and Venetia, agreed on unifying Italy with Victor Emmanuel as its first king. This meeting or assembly led to the unification of Italy, which was one of the most substantial unifications in the 19th century. Disunity in the 19th century was complicated. On one hand, it is disagreement and conflict within a group, but on the other hand, it is progress. Nothing in this world could have came about without disunity. If everything was being unified all the time, then truly no progress could be made. Disunity creates conflict, which then creates competition, which finally leads to progress because competition brings
out the best in people. An example of disunity in the 19th century was the Greeks in the Ottoman Empire. They became culturally distinct groups that resisted being added to a state or tried to break away. The Greeks of the Ottoman Empire were an extremely powerful group and possessed the nationalism qualities as well. They showed that nationalism is can be a force of disunity as well. In addition to this, the kingdoms and empires of the old order often ruled over a variety of ethnic groups. Conservatives of the old order reasoned that if each ethnic group wanted its own state, empires would split and crumble. The old order was thinking about nationalism when discussing this because their principles state that equal rights should be a requirement, not a suggestion, making it apparent that nationalism was a force of disunity because of the fact that these ethnic groups wanted their own states, but risked the empires splitting and crumbling. Russification also played a role as a force of disunity. Non-Russian communities, voluntarily or not, gave up their culture and language in favor of the Russian one. Lastly, liberalism, which is the quality of wanting to make progress, in countries lead to nationalism, which eventually led to democracy, freedom, and assembly and then to the Constitutional monarchy, which is a form of government in which a king or queen acts as Head of State . This caused disunity of the people because they did not agree with the idea of having one-person rule everything. Overall, nationalism and disunity are two words in a relationship where one can affect the other as much the another can affect it, meaning that nationalism is directly to disunity that occurred in the 19th century.