Preview

What Was The Role Of Soldiers In The Roman Army

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
789 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Was The Role Of Soldiers In The Roman Army
The Roman Empire had a military force unlike anything the world had ever seen. They had one of the biggest empires in world history and ruled it effectively. The Romans were so dominant due to their impeccable training, revolutionary strategies, and easy to follow chain of command
Roman soldiers were among the best trained on the planet. Male soldiers started training at age 16 and before they even touched a weapon they had to learn how to march properly. The Romans viewed marching as uber important because if soldiers were straggling, the group would not be all together and therefore, vulnerable to attack. According to an article from roman-empire.net, “...during the summer months the soldiers were to be marched twenty Roman miles, which
…show more content…
The Romans did what few before them had done, which was actually sitting down and talk about the battle before it took place. In Mark Cartwright's article for the Ancient History Encyclopedia he writes, “Commanders could hold a consilium or war council with their officers to present and discuss strategies for attack and utilise the experience of veteran campaigners.” Those in charge were just as prepared as their soldiers. They knew battles could not be won just by brute force, that's why they took the time to go over strategies. The Romans were also known to use, “suitable reconnaissance by a scouting vanguard of exploratores troops.” (Cartwright) The army commanders would learn about the terrain they were about to encounter and find a way to take advantage of it. Another part of the Romans’ great strategy was who they brought with them to a battle, “One particular innovation of the Imperial period was the introduction of doctors (medici) and medical assistants (capsarii), who were attached to most military units.” (Cartwright) If a soldier was wounded in battle the doctors could try to fix him and get him back into the fight. This helped immensely, especially since the Romans relied on a phalanx formation when in battle. The phalanx is basically just a square, the soldiers remained close together and protected the guy next to him. Just one guy missing from that could have drastic repercussions.
The Roman chain of command was of the utmost importance. Highly trained soldiers and good strategies meant nothing if the soldiers had nobody telling them what to do. And this went far beyond one general telling thousands of soldiers to simply attack. C. N. Trueman explains this well in his article “The Roman Army and Warfare” in it he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    educated generals to battle bred, tacticians who were always one step ahead of the enemy in the…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spartacus Film Analysis

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the movie Spartacus the deployment of the Roman army is very interesting. In the battle scene you see a deployment of a legion in a quincunx formation (checker board pattern) this shows the discipline and organization of the Roman army. As the Roman army comes closer to Spartacus' slave army the front legion starts to form a solid front line and they would continue moving forward. As the front group is lining up you can see the back legionaries coming together into one group. As an opponent seeing this it can be quiet intimating.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though this would be the primary dominate force on the battlefield, Rome actually lost battles because they were primarily heavy infantry. Roman soldiers adopted fighting tactics of other forces and enemies to become the most elite force on the battle field. Starting out, soldiers fought like the Greek worriers known as hoplites. Hoplites were essentially an infantry man armed with a shield and spear, which were on reserve until called to battle. The tactics that were adopted from the Hoplites was a formation called the Phalanx. This formation consisted of soldiers lining up shoulder to shoulder with their weapon in one hand and shield in the opposite. Not only did this help with shields protecting one another, it made lines impenetrable for arrows, spears and enemy as long as they maintained a solid line side by side.2…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How did Augustus create a strong professional army? Why was creating a paid military force important for securing the Empire? Do you think that these changes helped Augustus in his running of the provinces and securing the boarders of Rome? For leaders of many ancient civilization establishing key areas of their nations or territories in the terms of government, military, and religions. These three aspects would allow a ruler to have away to gain respect, power, support, and if necessary control.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caesar also deployed in three lines. He arrayed his men 6 men deep. He rested his left on the marshland of the river and he positioned all his cavalry on the right, against Pompey's squadrons. Behind them he hid light troops, carrying javelins and other weapons, in anticipation of Pompey's cavalry. Caesar himself commanded his cavalry. He also had 2,000 legionaries as reserves. He posted the notorious tenth legion on his right under Sulla, with the understrength eighth and possibly the ninth on his left under Antonius. In the center he designated Domitius as the commanding officer. According to his accounts, he had 80 cohorts on the battlefield, about 22,000…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The army had 125,000 soldiers, each highly trained in the advanced military tactics introduced by Julius Caesar. The barbarians could barely get through the shields of the army, that were locked together, to create almost a portable wall. Also, as the army were so powerful, they could be used to keep the citizens in line. As an intimidation factor, the army were strong, powerful and highly trained, so no citizens dared mess with them.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In document D it says “ The Spartans learned to read and write for purely practical reasons: all other forms of education the banned from the country, books and treatises being included in as much as [foreign teachers].” This is a weakness because there strategies were not strong because they didn’t have the knowledge, they only had the strength. So during battle, they can only fight with strength but, whoever they are battling will have knowledge and strategy. How are we supposed to last long in battle when we are hurt but have no strategy to keep fighting?…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Body Armor

    • 3135 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Roman army, which was up to around thirty legions, well built armour was more in need than ever on the frontiers. The army could be divided into two distinct parts the legion and the auxiliary. Only Roman citizens could become a legionnaire, while the auxiliary were made of non citizens from Rome's settled territories. The early view put forward by a historian named Webster was that the equipment used by the legionnaires was remarkably…

    • 3135 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, indeed throughout history, Rome ultimately exhibited a readiness to adapt its military tactics and strategy to successfully confront particular challenges. The Roman military was a highly organized institution. There was a straightforward system of rank, and a number of different splitting up of the basic unit. The entire basis of Roman infantry tactics was the idea that by keeping troops in arranges, one could fight more successfully. Most military commanders of the day simply had their troops rush passionately at the enemy, relying on better numbers, better soldiers, or luck to hold the day. The Romans realized that they could not always rely on these, so they turned to strategy. Each situation was wrapped up differently, taking into account land, the type and strength of the opponent's troops, and the type and strength of the Roman's troops. The Romans also thought that the best tactic would be the one that had the most effect without exposing the troops to unnecessary risk. One of them was to cut off their opponent from his resources. Armies run on their stomachs and equipment, and both require regular supplies. Without a stable supply of food and water, an army will starve or dehydrate killing or uncomforting the troops and they would fall apart. The Roman Soldiers would attack the resources themselves. When they conquered territory, they took as much as they could. This not only gave them more food, it prevented it from falling into their opponent's hands and they would also try to cut off the transportation so the amount of supplies that could reach the enemy was severely reduced. One of the most famous tactics that the Romans used was called “siege”. Siege was a military operation in which troops surround a place and cut off all outside access to force surrender. The Romans would typically build a wall around the existing city to help control the enemy. This wall would be built to prevent the enemy from escaping. The ongoing siege would eventually…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    der Empire ComparisonThe Ottoman Empire and Mughal Empire both being “Gunpowder Empires” faced similar issues. Both empires faced inadequate transportation and communication systems, both faced poor bureaucracies, and competing with rival empires.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After camping overnight, the relief army formed their ranks over a three mile plane and marched towards the city. This massive force included not only foot soldiers, but also the skilled Gallic cavalry, with archers and lightly armed men to defend them. When the entrapped Gauls saw their saviors, they became overjoyed, and proceeded to discharge their soldiers to battle Rome. As for Caesar, “[he] stationed the whole of his infantry along the lines of the fortifications, so that...every man could could know his post . . . He then ordered the calvary to ride out of camp and to attack the enemy.”…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Roman army was also a regular force, although not always a volunteer force. Because of the frequency of battle, the Senate created a professional army. The soldiers in the army were paid for their time away from their families and livelihood. There was also a draft, with all men of military age eligible for up to sixteen years of service. A professional army also meant plenty of time for training. The frequency of battle also created a mammoth force of…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Roman military? Strengths: Phenomenal engineering skills ­ building buildings, roads, aqueducts etc. Highly advanced governmental administration system High level of literacy compared to the world average of the time. High respect placed on learning. Occasionally gifted Emperors, generals and politicians.…

    • 379 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Spartan Warrior Society

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Some say the reason that Sparta was so focused on having a powerful military was because of a…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Engineering as Social Experimentation Similarities to Standard Experiments 1. Any project is carried out in partial ignorance. 2. The final outcomes of engineering projects are generally uncertain. 3.…

    • 451 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays