Preview

Which Party Was In Charge When Did We Invade

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
137 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Which Party Was In Charge When Did We Invade
@read, [Curly] I see you're a history buff.
Which party was in charge when WWI started?
Which country did we invade and which one didn't we invade?
France - Germany.

Which party was in charge, Dec. 7, 1941 ?
Other than dropping bombs on Japan, when did we invade them?
How many Island Nations did we invade?
Which party was in charge, when Germany declared war on us.?
How many countries did we invade before Germany.

Who was in charge during the korean war?
What country did we invade? Do you know where Inchon is?

Which party was in charge, when we made a mess of Libya?
Which lead to Hillary's fiasco, Benghazi.

Which party was in charge when Obama made a mess of Syria.
Obama drops bombs and the refuges invade the E.U. and the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Account for the failure of 3rd parties to break the monopoly of power held by the Democrats and Republicans…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Colonial Attack Dbq 1775

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This battle was fought on December 31st 1775. The reason that the battle was fought on this day was because the enlistment contract runs out as of the New Year so if it was fought on January 1st Britain’s troops wouldn’t be enlisted. Another reason that the battle had been fought on this day was that there was a very bad snowstorm and it would hide the movement of the American troops. The plan was the attack on two fronts, one lower part of Quebec and then to scale the walls of the upper city and attack from an upper front.Arnold and the Americans had surrendered and backed off. They had held a blockade of the city until the British reinforcements had arrived. This battle was the first major defeat for the Americans in the revolutionary war. This war had…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many reasons why America was forced to declare war on Britain in 1812. As President Madison stated for the cause to declare war were due to the impressments of U.S. sailors by the British, the blockade of U.S. ports, the British supporting the Indians and as well as the British violating America’s neutral rights. To further understand why America went to war; I will explain each of the reasons a bit more clearly with additional details.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There where many factors that lead to America’s decision to declare war on Germany in 1917. The war with Germany had been going for 3 years before America entered the war, at first America made it clear that it would remain neutral to follow George Washington’s belief that America should not get involved in foreign affairs or alliances. But as the war went on Americans began to believe that we should go to war with Germany. Many factors that lead for us to enter the war like the German naval policy, Woodrow Wilson’s idealism, and to protect America’s economic interest.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To what extent was the United States of America responsible for the collapse of the Grand Alliance?…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United State of matter extension Hawai'i in 1900. *This is an example of imperial ism because Hawaii was nothing but an island and the United State of matter went over there and took over them, and added them as a State Department. The United State added Hawaii to the republic because it was simpler to spy on Nippon from there, and from 1000 sea mile away, they added them after the Japanese bomb the United State Department Army.…

    • 289 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    "two-party system." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online Academic Edition. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2012. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/611292/two-party-system>.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They were not overreacting. Great Britain had taken away many rights that a human had. They were taking advantage of America and using it as a source to pay the debts from war. They were taxed very heavily but yet still they were not able to have any representation of the country which they were taxed by. Also Great Brittan had soldiers in America roaming the streets and causing a ruckus during the peace time. Americans were basically made slaves of their mother country Great Brittan when really they were citizens just like anyone who lived there overseas. The Americans tried things such as the Boston Tea Party this only raised the price of tea and caused even worse restrictions on the colonist. There was nothing left to do. When a government takes away your rights which you are given by your creator you are justified to violent resistance to government, the information above shows this. This could not be over-reacting they were not living the lives they were supposed to be living because of the King. If any one overreacted it would be the British who overreacted to little things done by the colonist and used it as an excuse to do something which would hurt the colonist and help the country abroad. This is why the American colonist were justified in taking up arms against the British government, there was nothing else left to…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    America started being independent after British lose American Revolution. British had the best military and best equipped. Literally, they had the better superiority and more advantages than America got. Therefore, Britain is a very gentle country, this culture and the way they treat the colonies which are in northern America might impact the result of revolution as well. Some choices they made and the way they thought as well as the location they are, these total main elements caused the British lose revolution and made the events happened in history.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    |What were the advantages and |Popular sovereignty meant that the sovereign people of a territory should determine the statues of |…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Reconstructive Obama

    • 4306 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Milkis, Sidney M., and Jesse H. Rhodes. “Barack Obama, the Democratic Party, and the Future of the “New American Party System”“ The Obama Administration: Setting Up A Government 7.1 (2009): 1-26.…

    • 4306 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Imperialism Dbq

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the years between 1830 and 1860, the United States grew economically, socially, and most noticeably, geographically. In this time period, Texas, Oregon, California, New Mexico, and Arizona were gained, completing the continental United States. Many Americans in the 19th century believed this acquisition of territory was a manifest destiny, or event accepted as inevitable. They thought it was the destiny of the U.S. to control all land from the east coast to the west coast. However, I believe that this land was taken as an act of aggressive imperialism on the part of the United States. Imperialism is the practice of extending the power and dominion of a nation by direct territorial acquisitions of other areas, and clearly America took much of this land by force rather than negotiation with other nations. The motives of the United States was not that of expansion, but in hopes of gaining new resources, land for agriculture,…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The idea of American imperialist is a derivative of ideal of Marxism and the U.S. Foreign policy after the Spanish-American War. American has been considered the police of the world for years. We find ourselves on every continent in almost every country of the world. Many people have compared the United States to the Roman Empire and the fact that the Roman Empire crumbles and so will America. The idea that of America being a imperialist state is shared not only by anarchist of U.S. government but by many nations around the world. America’s policy to uphold democracy around the world can be seen as America attempting to maintain power in foreign nations or convert other nations to our form of government can easily be misconstrued as imperialistic. In order to understand American Imperialism we must first understand the two separately; America’s foreign policy by itself, the idea of Imperialism, and finally the two together. The U.S. Secretary of State is the foreign minister and is the official charged with state-to-state diplomacy, although the president has ultimate authority over foreign policy; that policy includes defining the national interest, as well as the strategies chosen to both safeguard that and achieve its policy goals. The officially stated goals of the foreign policy of the United States, as mentioned in the Foreign Policy Agenda of the U.S. Department of State, are "to create a more secure, democratic, and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community." This is was is in debate, whether America is doing to much to attempt to benefit the international community, and if we are, is it in our interest of those of the foreign nation. The U.S. Foreign Policy began in 1803 with the Louisiana Purchase encompassed all or part of 14 current U.S. states and two Canadian provinces. Napoleon Bonaparte, upon completion of the agreement, stated, "This accession of territory affirms…

    • 1272 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Australian Invasion

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The European invasion of Australia in 1780 impacted upon the lives of all the Aboriginal people that lived in and around the invaded areas. When Captain Cook landed in Australia, he declared it as Terra Nullius, and this alone gives a significant insight as to the mentality of the British and their willingness to acknowledge the Aboriginal people and the importance that the land played in their daily lives. As the invaders brought with them their laws, ideals, diseases, livestock and people, the need for land increased and settlers began to venture outwards from the main settlements, the frontier broadened and the Aboriginal population began to shrink. The encroachment upon the land meant that many Aboriginal people were now being forced to come into closer contact with the Europeans. In doing this, the frontier affected the Aboriginal people in ways that ensured that their lives would never be the same and that European ideals affected their lives not only on the frontier but for generations too follow. The invasion of the Australian frontier affected areas in Aboriginal lives such as dispossession, disease, large-scale violence, which led to resistance.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yeh Ling-Ling continued on explaining that “Mass immigration impacts minorities and the working class the most, the very people liberals want to protect.” I understand the author’s point of view, however immigrants came here for a better life, therefore they should not have a negative impact on many minorities because these people can get educated and become established citizens and will most likely be available to many resources than legal immigrants can. Immigration doesn’t just happen and leave a negative impact, there are multiple positive impacts that could even benefit the minorities as well such as; when a documented immigrant works, their wages are spent on necessities which benefits the country and the state which they reside,…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays