Preview

Whitehead V. Whitehead Case Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
739 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Whitehead V. Whitehead Case Summary
Statement of Facts: The Whiteheads got divorced in 2016. Mr. Whitehead is supposed to pay $700.00 a month for child support. In January of 2017, Mr. Whitehead lost his job and stayed unemployed until October of 2017. After 10 months of being unemployed, Mr. Whitehead found a job as an electrician. While he was unemployed, he did not pay any of the child support. In 2017, Mrs. Whitehead filed a motion for a divorce decree with the court. Mrs. Whitehead wanted Mr. Whitehead to pay the $7000.00 he owes from being unemployed. Mr. Whitehead then made a petition to reduce the amount he owed. The petition stated he wanted the court to excuse him from paying the missed child support. The court countered his offer and ordered Mr. Whitehead to pay …show more content…
The formula shall be based upon the needs of the child and the actual resources of each parent. The formula shall establish a minimum threshold for modification of a child support amount. The formula shall consider the child care and dependent health care coverage costs of each parent. The formula shall include guidelines for setting and administratively adjusting the amount of periodic payments for overdue support, including guidelines for adjustment of arrearage payment schedules when the current support obligation for a child terminates and the payer owes overdue …show more content…
Which in this case, the court ordered him to pay half the amount due. The court cannot allow him to pay only half because of the formula they must abide by. The formula will take into consideration his unemployment. In the Borowsky, the court had to follow the formula, even though the defendant was unemployed at the time. In Moncada v. Moncada, the court found that the petition was insufficient. The court also ordered when he found a job they would increase the amount of child support. This is because he must make up the money even though he was unemployed. In the Whitehead v. Whitehead case, the defendant was unemployed and asked for a petition. The court cannot only allow Mr. Whitehead to pay half instead of adding to the child

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Rolon v Commonwealth Unemployment Comp. Bd.of Review, 59 Pa. Commw. 378, 429 A.2d 1256 (1981).…

    • 4200 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The next day and over the course of a month Fiore had people to make efforts from Nevada to show that the money was indeed legit and have not been earned illegally. The petitioner helped draft an affidavit to show probable cause for forfeiture of the funds. Fiore filed a lawsuit against Walden in the district court of Nevada saying Walden had no probable cause to search and seize the money and for him keeping the money even why he found out that the money was indeed legit. The District Court granted Walden motion to dismiss the case because Nevada had no jurisdiction over the case, for the seizer of the money took place in Georgia. During the appeal a divided panel ended up coming to the verdict that the search and seizer of the money could not support Nevada jurisdiction, however the Nevada had jurisdiction over the alleged false affidavit for knowing it would be a significant connection o Nevada also that delaying the funds would cause foreseeable harm which made this jurisdiction…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pete Foley Case Summary

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Maureen Foley (she has resumed her maiden name) and Richard Turrow were divorced in 2006 in Idaho, following ten years of marriage. At the time of the divorce, the couple had two children, Colin and Tyler, ages 4 and 6, and the court awarded joint legal custody to both parties and physical custody of both children to Maureen. Richard was ordered to pay $450/month in child support for both children. At the time of this order, Richard made approximately $25,000 a year, and Maureen made $14,000 a year. Maureen now makes $18,000 a year and just isn’t cutting it with such a low amount of child support for two growing children who eat a lot more food than they did when they were only 4 and 6. Also, Richard now makes $45,000 a year thanks to a major promotion a few years ago.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Eldridge’s case relied on the ruling of Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970), which said that the withholding of welfare benefits must be preceded by an “evidentiary hearing”. The current ruling is based on The Fifth Amendment of the Due Process Clause and The Social…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ms. Moore and Mr. Richardson divorced and Ms. Moore was granted custody of their minor daughter. Mr. Richardson was required to pay child support accordingly and have visitation rights. The case is good law. It is binding to Arkansas court. Clearly, Arkansas court made the final judgment about the custody of the child and visitation by the father.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Second, the Plaintiff is incapacitated within the meaning of the ADA. Third, the Plaintiff could have completed the job with rational accommodations. Forth, the Plaintiff was subject to adversative employment action due to the incapacity.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zippittelli V Jc Penny

    • 6840 Words
    • 28 Pages

    Plaintiff sought relief in the form of appointment to the position she was denied, back pay, costs and attorney's fees, front pay, and punitive and liquidated damages.…

    • 6840 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The landmark Sheff v. O’Neill Connecticut Supreme Court decision will have a dramatic effect on the state of education in the great state of Connecticut. The de-facto segregation of Connecticut public schools over several years has been a troubling trend that has ultimately led to the decision reached by the court. The low performance of schools in the Hartford area has been a concern of many parents and educators. A child’s education is the most valuable tool a child can receive to prepare themselves for the world. The people of Connecticut must recognize the impact that failing schools can have on the entire state. The people in the Connecticut General Assembly and yourself must act to ensure each child has a chance at fulfilling their God given talents. However, I do not believe the Connecticut Supreme Court was correct in saying that it is the…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Studies

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Mrs. Mitchell would file for unemployment. Upon the hearing by the deputy of the unemployment security commission it was founded that Mrs. Mitchell was in fact dismissed from her job for misconduct. Seven weeks of payment was forfeited due to this finding according to State guidelines s 59-9-6(B), N.M.S.A.1953. On July 24, 1974, Mrs. Mitchell would file appeal. On August 28, 1974 referee of the Appeal Tribunal reversed the deputy’s decision and reinstated these benefits to Mrs. Mitchell. On September 13, 1974, the Lovington Good Samaritan Center would file appeal with Appeal Tribunal to the whole Commission pursuant to s 59-9-6(E), N.M.S.A.1953. The Commission would overrule the first appeal and withhold the seven week pay from Mrs. Mitchell. Mrs. Mitchell filed a motion of certiorari and this was granted to her by Commission to the District Court of Bernalillo County pursuant to s 59-9-6(K), N.M.S.A.1953. On January 16, 1976, this was heard by District Court the ruling was to reinstate Mrs. Mitchell benefits.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Present child custody and support laws do not make any sense. They often penalize hard working parents and alienate parents from children they love. These laws must be re-examined and revised so that the best interest of children be served at all times.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The topic of child support and how the funds are allocated can become a very debatable topic. The way child support works in most states is that if the custodial parent (the parent the child lives with) receives Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) the child support paid by the non-custodial parent goes towards paying the state back. Some feel that the state should not try to recoup the money. Others feel that by the state taking the child support payments, it takes away from the custodial parent and still leaves the single parent with the burden to take care of the child alone. I disagree with this argument. I feel that the state should be paid back for TANF benefits awarded and garnishing child support payments may be the easiest way to receive payment.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anyone could argue about child support, but who has to pay is determined by a judge in court. What I don't understand about why some women file for it, like the ones' who has all these kids and don't have a job or don't want a job, but wants money. Women who don't have jobs, but has their hair and nails done, and talk about their kids needs clothes and diapers. Women who don't want the father to take full responsibility for their child or children, but will let them get their child or children if they give them some money when they get their checks cashed. I feel that if a child's father is doing his part as a father why put them on child support. If the father offers to take care of the child or children until the mother…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In March 2010, Margaret Besen filed for divorce because her relationship with her now ex-husband caused fighting to break out within the household scaring their 2, then young, children. In the Besen divorce case, Judge Kent’s first resolution was to impose financial obligations on the ex-husband, who was employed with an exceptional paying job, which included weekly child support of $200. But when the ex never made the payments, the judge who was working the case did nothing but watch Margaret, who was unemployed at the time, struggle to provide for herself and her kids. Now Margaret and her kids are living well without the help of her ex With that said most cases don’t have to do with a spouse or relative, it sometimes must do with the system itself. Doug Deason wrote to the New Times, “But unlike many in my situation, I could fight the charge.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many parents with a custody and parenting plan already in place eventually run across life changes, professional changes, personal lifestyle adjustments, etc. that lead them to wonder about the possibility of modifying child support. Child support can be changed or modified, but there are limitations as to when and why. One or both parents can modify their child support when they can show a changed circumstance that is both substantial and continuing. The keywords in the limitations regarding modification or termination of child support are: substantial and continuing.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Oblicon Digests

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages

    * Respondent filed a complaint for moral and exemplary damages to RTC of Pasig because of dishonoring her checks even if she had sufficient money.…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays