Preview

Who Is Alexander The Great A Hero

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
693 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Is Alexander The Great A Hero
ALEXANDER THE GREAT: AN ANALYSIS Alexander the Great is a villain because he murdered thousands and thousands of innocent people and he would conquer civilizations against their will.
Alexander would set fire to cities, destroy cultures, torture and kill people, and he even killed his dad and his brother. According to Article Lined with gold, “Like Achilles, Alexander had a quick and wild temper. Alexander set fire to the town of Thebes, as a punishment for their revolt, much like Achilles and his army did to the Asian city of Troy. Alexander, in a fit of rage, once tied the body of an African who was fighting for the Persians, to his chariot and drove it around the castle that the African was protecting. (Calvin 5)” A hero is not someone
…show more content…
But Alexander the Great did things way worse than this. He conquered civilizations against their own will, he killed anyone that didn’t agree with him and anyone he thought would stand in his way. According to ALEXANDER-THE-NOT-SO-GREAT, “According to legend, when Alexander the Great saw that his empire stretched across the entire known world, he wept for there were no more kingdoms left to conquer. By the age of 30, Alexander ruled over an empire spanning three continents and covering more than two million square miles (The John Maxwell Company 1) Alexander had conquered the whole world by the time he was only 30, he passed away when he was just thirty two, murdering thousands of thousands of people. When there were no more civilizations to conquer he broke down and cried. He was a cruel killer. He wanted to murder and he had already taken over the whole known world and he wanted more. This is not a mark of someone who is a hero. A hero doesn’t kill millions of people a hero is not selfish enough to break down and cry when there was nobody else to kill. He only thought about himself since he would kill anybody that he thought might get in the way of anything he was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. He also killed innocent kids, women and elderly when they would run to their own temples. (Alexander the Great Packet)…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now, instead of simply discussing his most glorious battle and successful expansion of his empire by overthrowing the Persian Empire. And although they were a major success to his rising to power. People must be able to understand exactly how even after defeating his enemies, Alexander ran these new additions to his empire and effected them through cultural influence. While Alexander was exceedingly bright, some may have doubted how he chose to run them. Even after the overthrowing of Darius III, Alexander still wanted to add more to his empire. He even went as far as India to overthrow, which only failed due to homesick soldiers. Thus, this had to be Alexander's greatest flaw, he didn't know when enough was enough. Now, back to subject at…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An example of an achievement will be establishing an empire and find the best way to improve it which was what Herod the great did to earn his title. He initiated construction at Jerusalem, Jericho, and Caesarea of theaters, amphitheaters, and hippodromes . Alexander's actions may have made significant changes to the world back then and today, but his goals were not too different from Hitler's which was to conquer the world. Hitler today was not respected by anyone and definitely not today. Although he killed many people in a much more cruel way than Alexander, but their purpose was similar, to dominate land. It is not worth the lives he had killed. It was not only the army of who he was fighting against that was killed and injured, more than half of Alexander's army died at the journey through the desert of Gedrosia. No one considers a murderer "great". Alexander sympathizes for those people that he killed? It does not mention anywhere that Alexander did anything in memory those people and not even his own people that were killed. Many people say it was because of him uniting all those cities that initiated development in Europe. It is true that after the unification, economical and cultural development did boast. Alexander should…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, Alexander was arrogant and cocky. “Alexander believed himself to be Achilles’s descendant.” (Document A). Alexander also believed “...that he himself was a god.” (Background Essay). How incredibly arrogant and full of yourself do you have to be do have such incredibly high standards for yourself? How does that make him a “great” man? Someone who is known to be “great” normally wouldn’t have an ego the size of Texas. They are much more modest than…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that Alexander the Great,was a villain when his dad was alive,but when his dad died he became a hero.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander was great because he conquered a country in the years 333BC, 332BC, 331BC, 331BC, 330BC, 327BC, 324BC and 323BC. This demonstrates that he was great because he used tactics that would defeat enemies. An example of a tactic he used is phalanx. Phalanx means “a body of Macedonian infantry drawn up in close order with shields touching and long spears overlapping”. This was good because he could easily besiege cities which helped him take over the Mediterranean. My own research shows that Alexander the Great took power over the countries Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine, Egypt, northern Afghanistan and Iraq. This shows how Alexander the Great was so prodigious.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexanders respect of other people's beliefs was one of the biggest reasons he is considered great. While other conquerors in this time period, like the persians, would try to destroy and get rid of other people's cultures Alexander would study and learn from them. He did this to such an extent in Egypt that they even referred to him as a god and pharaoh. In other places he would study their beliefs, and try to understand them as a people, and he may have been doing this to learn how to control them, but based on his character it is more likely that he did it so learn how to respect them.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Document C illustrates how Alexander was able to defeat the Tyre which was a self proclaimed “unconquerable city” because it was built on an island protected with high walls. “ The great city…. Was now utterly destroyed. Her king, Azimilik, and various other notables, including envoys from carthage, had taken refuge in the temple of Melkart, and Alexander spared their lives. The remaining survivors, some 30,000 in numbers, he sold into slavery, Two thousand men of military age were crucified.” (Doc C) Although some might argue he isn't great because the deaths of two thousand military man are quite brutal he did it out of pure leadership in order to finish the battle he started. Alexander stepped up as a leader and was able to lead men into a battle and defeat the unconquerable city. Also In Document C, another battle or march, Alexander shows leadership, “Alexander had ordered that all [expect] those who sought sanctuary were to be slain” (Document C). This shows Alexander was great by leadership because he made the big decision for his troops on what to follow out, even though it was a rough game plan, he stepped up and took charge.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the great is a villain not, a hero. Alexander lied,cheated,frightened,and killed in his time of rule,if he did all of these things why is he called Alexander the Great? Alexander killed millions of innocent people he also made millions of people scared of him,“In 327 BCE, with the Persian Empire firmly under his control, Alexander turned his attention to India. He had some victories before reaching the Ganges river, which he intended to cross in order to conquer more of India”.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander the Great should be remembered as a hero because he conquered many lands. While expanding his empire, he came across the cultures of Egypt, Persia, Africa, and India. He became allies with Greece and parts of the African culture. Alexander had conquered over 70 cities while expanding. Alexander first conquered Egypt then Persia.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander: Hero or Not

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In conclusion I believe Alexander the great should be remembered a hero for these three reasons. The first reason is he showed respect for his enemies, next he was a brilliant commander and last but not least he invented very evolved things for his…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reading “Alexander the Great” by J. Kelley Sowards it talks about how Alexander had a sense that he was meant for something greater than his life in Macedonia, as the son of a king her had the idea of manifest destiny which was said to explained his “instinct for the unusual, the cryptic, the dramatic in political and religious, as well as in strategic and military decisions.” (pg. 71 MWT) Though many studies and reading it is said that even though Alexander conquered much of his world, he did not complete his life long quest and visions of our world. Alexander believed that it was imperative to record his deeds so with in his ranks he had two scholars named Callisthenes and Aristobus which keep books or dairies about Alexander’s triumphs…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Homer’s Iliad is well-known for the graphic battlefield violence it describes - through such violence, the epic effectively demonstrates the modern idea of hypermasculinity - the pressure for men to fit certain stereotypes, essentially. In this case, both sides seem to operate off of an “economy of honor”; the goal of most soldiers is to gain personal glory, in order to be remembered by future generations in a heroic light. The most effective way to do this is to be a war hero, which naturally involves large amounts of violence - Hector, for example, is described as “the greatest joy of Troy and all [its] people,” and is mourned greatly after his death. (24.830) However, Homer depicts him as a “maniac,” killing great numbers of Achaean soldiers,…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a youth Alexander set out with his army to Egypt with a confidence that he could do almost anything. After conquering Egypt he describes himself as being part god, to the dimay of some Greeks. He even refuses Darius’ offer for Alexander to marry his daughter, because he says he does not need his permission to marry Darius’ daughter. This part of Alexander’s life serves to show his “young and stupid” phase, where is extremely cocky, acting as if he could take over the entire world if he wanted to, even though he does see most of the world in terms of what people during Alexander’s time thought the world was. Although Alexander does become more wise to the ways of the world as he ages, he never really sheds his over-confidence until right before his death.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is Achilles A Hero

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Achilles would not have made a very popular quarterback in todays society. As the ancient Greeks defined heroism, he fits the title of Hero perfectly. He is the son of a goddess, the best and most capable warrior in the entire Achaean army, and has conquered many places. However, the actions of Achilles in "The Iliad" by Homer, or rather the inactions, would have ue hero might focus on conquests he has yet to do, where as Achilles seems obsesseerased him from common knowledge, if not opened him to public ridicule in modern times. According to societys general standards, a hero is someone who is not simply strong and brave, but someone who is humble, self-sacrificing, and capable of many other things, especially forgiveness. Achilles fails to display these essential characteristics in the Iliad. His lack of compassion and stubborn refusal to ignore his wounded pride cancel out his god-given attributes and do not earn him the title of Hero.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays