Who Is Francisco Pizarro?
Who is Francisco Pizarro:
Conquistador is a term that defines the soldiers and explorers of the New World. There are many conquistadors before the discovery of the new world. However, the most important and unforgettable conquistador was born between sometime in the 1470s. Francisco Pizarro, Gonzalez, is the Spanish conquistador who was the leader of the expedition of the Inca Empire. And behind this expedition, there is a long story that defines a man and events that prove a fact. So, who is Francisco Pizarro? According to the facts, Francisco Pizarro was born in Trujillo, Spain. His date of birth is unknown, but some say that it is sometimes in the 1470s, perhaps 1474. He was the illegitimate son of infantry Colonel Gonzalo Pizarro, who …show more content…
Even though the Inca people trusted him and gave him all their money, gold and silver pieces where they consider it as a part of their religion, the gold refers to the sun god and the silver refer to the moon god. As it was mentioned, “The Inca delivered the gold and silver, but Pizarro executed Atahualpa anyway.” (Francisco Pizarro - Ducksters). He did what was in his mind. He killed more than 2000 men and captured more than 5000 as well as Atahualpa the who was a hostage. After taking what he wanted, he gave his man what they deserve from the gold and then order to executed Atahualpa by garrote in such an evil way in from of his people, and that prove how violent he …show more content…
They say that what he did in Inca is like art, and his way in invasion was creative, and his achievement is an art itself. However, in my point of view, I think that what he did is defined him a murder and someone who took something that does not belong to him, and his violence expeditions and the way how he killed the Inca people prove that. So simply, all that Francisco Pizarro did was a violence work, he destroyed the Inca and killed her people. His expedition proves that he was an evil conquistador and not an artist, Francisco did not create any art neither in Inca nor Spain and so that prove that he belongs to murder and violence and not to art and creativity just like what other people think or
Conquistador is a term that defines the soldiers and explorers of the New World. There are many conquistadors before the discovery of the new world. However, the most important and unforgettable conquistador was born between sometime in the 1470s. Francisco Pizarro, Gonzalez, is the Spanish conquistador who was the leader of the expedition of the Inca Empire. And behind this expedition, there is a long story that defines a man and events that prove a fact. So, who is Francisco Pizarro? According to the facts, Francisco Pizarro was born in Trujillo, Spain. His date of birth is unknown, but some say that it is sometimes in the 1470s, perhaps 1474. He was the illegitimate son of infantry Colonel Gonzalo Pizarro, who …show more content…
Even though the Inca people trusted him and gave him all their money, gold and silver pieces where they consider it as a part of their religion, the gold refers to the sun god and the silver refer to the moon god. As it was mentioned, “The Inca delivered the gold and silver, but Pizarro executed Atahualpa anyway.” (Francisco Pizarro - Ducksters). He did what was in his mind. He killed more than 2000 men and captured more than 5000 as well as Atahualpa the who was a hostage. After taking what he wanted, he gave his man what they deserve from the gold and then order to executed Atahualpa by garrote in such an evil way in from of his people, and that prove how violent he …show more content…
They say that what he did in Inca is like art, and his way in invasion was creative, and his achievement is an art itself. However, in my point of view, I think that what he did is defined him a murder and someone who took something that does not belong to him, and his violence expeditions and the way how he killed the Inca people prove that. So simply, all that Francisco Pizarro did was a violence work, he destroyed the Inca and killed her people. His expedition proves that he was an evil conquistador and not an artist, Francisco did not create any art neither in Inca nor Spain and so that prove that he belongs to murder and violence and not to art and creativity just like what other people think or