Preview

Who Is John Williams Utilitarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
501 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Is John Williams Utilitarianism
Williams’s is a popular opponent to John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarian rulebook when it comes to an agent's individuality. Williams believes that Utilitarianism is flawed because it requires agents to compromise their own individual self-concept both emotionally and morally. He thinks this because Utilitarianism says that in order for every series of events to be morally sound by producing the most happiness one may have to disregard their own projects and perform the action that will cause this outcome. William’s understands this to a certain extent. He realizes that in some cases agent’s will be asked to do things that compromise some of their own beliefs, however, Williams doesn’t believe that agents should ever have to compromise their projects that exist on a deeper level. These projects that agents view as being a part of their …show more content…
Williams views that by undermining an agent’s individual commitments in order to foster another agent’s projects because they create the output that Utilitarianism requires this is “in the most literal sense, an attack on his integrity” (117). Williams also wants to make clear the difference between an agent's projects causing harm and somebody else's projects causing harm. This is specifically relevant in the Jim and the Indians case in which Jim is asked to kill on indian and have the other nineteen set free. However, if he does not, all twenty indians will be killed. Williams uses this example to further his criticism of Utilitarianism by saying that it would require Jim to compromise his own commitments in order to save nineteen people. Jim would have to set aside his own self-concept of morality in order to perform the action that would result in the most happiness. Williams suggests that instead of immediately discounting one’s emotions regarding certain actions, Utilitarians should try to understand

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In other words, since preferences and choices can be weak or strong, interests should be provided with careful thought because they should be respected for the actual strength of the choices and preference they belong to. If human morality were the single motivating factor in human life, and everyone accepted preference utilitarianism, then all individuals would be able to respect individuals’ preferences in general. This action would involve a large amount of compromise, because each individual’s choices and preferences will eventually come into conflict with someone else’s choices and preferences. But in an ideal utilitarian world, choices and preferences would be respected to the best of human beings’ ability regardless of whose preferences they…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism Act means to do the right action that will benefit a good amount of people over any other option. In the two examples I read from Bernard Williams “A Critique of Utilitarianism” I realized those were two difficult choices these two men had to make. However, if we follow the Utilitarianism Act, George would of taken the job offer and Jim would unfortunately sacrifice one of the protestors to save the rest. By George taking the job offer, it would benefit his family financially and also help his family’s emotional battle. Also, George opposing chemical and biological warfare would mean he wont have much interest compared to the other gentlemen that had much more interest on the subject. This will benefit a large amount of people…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history philosophers have introduced new ideas and belief systems into society in hopes to better the world they lived in. Many philosophers have introduced ideas that are still in practice in American government. While popular belief among those trying to pave a path forward was that government, as it stood, was tyrannical and overly restrictive, however John Stuart Mill believed that through government happiness and freedom can be achieved.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pleasures and pain contribute in determining the classification of one’s actions. In Mill’s Utilitarianism, he examines what determines an action to be considered right or wrong, his own version of the hedonistic utilitarianism argument. He claims that these qualities, including the quantity, are an important factor in determining, when included in the consequences, the criteria of an action. The consequences are significant in determining the results of one’s actions.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that believes one should do what will promote the greatest utility for as many people as possible, that utility is often considered to be happiness or pleasure. There are different kinds of utilitarian views; hedonistic, preference, rule, and act to name a few, but they all have the same main objective. This theory does indeed seem good at first, but it is flawed. The case of the lonesome stranger challenges utilitarianism by bringing up issues of justice in different kinds of utilitarianism. The lonesome stranger is a persuasive argument to utilitarianism, showing problems pertaining to justice.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Prisoner Doctors

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mill, J. S. (1863). “Utilitarianism.” Exploring philosophy: an introductory anthology (4th ed., pp. 420-427). New York: Oxford University Press.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For example, according to James Rachels, “A faithful adherence to the utilitarian standard would require one to give away his or her wealth until they’ve made themselves as poor as the people they’ve been helping” (116). According to utilitarianism, individual happiness and wealth is outweighed by the happiness and wealth, or lack there of, of every citizen in the world. Mr. Rachels continues to say, “The problem is not merely that utilitarianism would require us to give away most of our things. It would also prevent us from carrying on our lives” (117). We all have goals and projects that make our lives meaningful, but an ethic that requires us to promote the general welfare of everyone on Earth would force us to abandon those endeavors. Additionally, Mr. Rachels states, “Utilitarianism disrupts our personal relationships. In practice, none of us are willing to treat everyone truly equally, because that would require giving up our special ties to friends and family” (117). We think of our friends and family as special— not just members of humanity. All of this is inconsistent with impartiality. When one is impartial, he or she misses out on intimacy, love and friendship. Given the problems that utilitarianism faces, it is not a shrewd ethical theory. Now that we have examined deontology’s antithesis, utilitarianism, and have shown it to be a faulty and contradicting ethical theory, we will examine deontology’s doctrine, starting with a few common…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mill’s Utilitarianism states that in order to be moral, one must make decisions based upon the greatest happiness. In…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy, which was developed in 19th century England by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill and Henry Sidgwick. The essential feature a utilitarian reside in, is the notion that an action is right if it produces the most amount of happiness well limiting suffering. Utilitarianism focuses solely on the consequences of the action, in an attempt to bring about the most happiness from each situation, well ensuring everybody’s happiness is equally considered.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. In Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Fifth Edition.Eds JohnPerry, Michael Bratman and John Martin Fischer. New York, NY: Oxford University press, 2010. Pp. 457-476.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Utilitarianism is a major position in normative ethics stemming from the late 18th and 19th century philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Contrary to the deontological approach to ethics that perceives morality as a duty or a moral rule that has to be followed, utilitarianism is a form of teleological ethics focussing on the consequences of actions meaning that the moral value of an action is solely determined by its outcome. Thus an action is considered right if it tends to produce happiness and wrong if it leads to the reverse effects of happiness, not only to the executer of the action but also to everyone else that is – either directly or indirectly – affected by the action.…

    • 3783 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Williams’ main critique of consequentialism is that it is too demanding. Moreover, Williams thinks that consequentialism is self-defeating, since its “teleological maximizing structure actually destroys a primary source of value in rational human life” (Powerpoint). This is because in consequentialism, we care only about maximizing the good and minimizing the bad, and not about how this is accomplished. And because of this, argues Williams, consequentialism destroys personal integrity, which plays a fundamental role in human happiness. Furthermore, since integrity plays a fundamental role in human happiness, and given the intrinsic conflict between consequentialism and personal integrity, it follows that consequentialism destroys the very thing…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of Mill’s strongest arguments in support of his philosophy of morality is seen in the last two paragraphs on page 95 of the textbook Ethical Theory. Here we find one of Mill’s foundational arguments which he later builds upon to argue in favor of utilitarianism.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Therefore, although it is ‘wrong’, it is ‘right’ at the same time. This perplexing contradiction may lead Williams to claim that object-given reasons and Objectivism cannot force us to act if a contradiction between two or more moral truths is reached. If moral truths are objective, then they must be equally forceful. If two contradicting moral truths are reached, then no choice, action, or belief can be made. This would create a grave dilemma for Objectivists as a world where people would not be able to make choices would end intellectual progress and dehumanize people as a whole. Moreover, if a distinctive decision could not be made between two choices, the capability to make moral choices (a defining ‘human’ feature) would cease to…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays