Who Is Nagel's Argument?

Nagel's argument is that death is bad to cause individual power by his consenting to directed against views from the beginning, and carefully establish the boundaries of his argument. For example, Nagel decides to leave aside the complex debate over whether we are "immortal" in some fashion - and define death as being the absence of any "conscious survival" .Similarly, he is equally careful to restrict the valuation of life to one's subjectivity instead of viewing it in an objective sense. This removes complications that may come from an "objective" viewing of the valuation of life from the perspective of others. Having thus carefully framed the boundaries of his argument, Nagel presents his key contention with regard to the "asymmetry" in
our understanding of the significance of death versus life." The weakness of Nagel's Argument is concealed in his refusal to consider and discuss the sole possibility of continuation of Life after Death at least in some form, Short-sightedness of such approach is obvious as anyone capable of mere Observation of our World would notice that Majority of the World Leaders are Creatures of Senior Age which means they or most of them will die soon. They or their Predecessors would have destroyed this world long ago should they not known for sure that there is Next Life and Responsibility for what was done in this World and Life. Paragraph 2}Everybody dies, but not everybody agrees about what death is. Some believe they will survive after the death of their bodies, going to Heaven or Hell or somewhere else, becoming a ghost, or returning to Earth in a different body, perhaps not even as a human being. Others believe they will cease to exist that the self is snuffed out when the body dies. And among those who believe they will cease to exist, some think this is a terrible fact, and others don't