Preview

Who Is To Blame For The Civil War?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1176 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Is To Blame For The Civil War?
Are thousands of lives to be lost before the union is whole again? Are the people of the colonies to suffer because of selfish people who cannot stray from their current way of life? There are many ways one can achieve the goals they have, and it may be necessary to learn a different way if the union is to survive. The civil war brought on important concerns pertaining to states seceding from the union and slavery being the cause of it. While I don’t believe the president is at fault for such awful things to take place, John Smith would sooner blame president Lincoln than accept responsibility for this happening himself. Therefore, the president is a victim, to me, in this situation. The president makes it known that it is his duty to serve …show more content…
Seceding from the union is not only illegal but dangerous. To secede from the union would mean you relinquish any rights to protection. That means the united states of America does not have to come to the aid of the seceded state for any reason as no laws the united states has applies to the seceded states. Which is why sir Butler, during the civil war was about to withhold slaves belonging to the rebels, for they claimed not to be a part of the union anymore. Regardless of what the states may claim, they have no right to secede from the union. No matter how much they disagree with the preceding of the executive office, they cannot legally break away from the united states. It is seen as void in the eyes of the law. The president expresses how he will do everything in his power to “protect, preserve, and defend” (Lincoln,3) the union. In …show more content…
While John Smith didn’t believe this was in the best interest of all the states, the president did his best to protect the union. He believed it was in the best interest of the states not to cause a civil war by picking rather he’s for or against slavery. Regardless of what John or the Carolinas felt, it is against the law to break free from the union. There is no constitutional right of any state to do so. The president has taken an oath; He is obligated to preserve, protect, and defend the union, and he will do so at any cost. He doesn’t find it impossible for the southerner to survive without the slaves. He believes it is possible for everyone to live harmoniously. I find what John is saying to be ridiculous. No amount of lives are necessary to sacrifice in order for anyone to live a more carefree lifestyle. The slaves deserved to live the life they choose as well. I don’t think John Smith fully understood what he was saying to Virginia during his speech. Rather or not John shared the same views of the president or not, majority of what John said in his speech is unjust and wrong. Therefore, I don’t believe any state has the right to secede from the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    AP us history

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The one defect of the South was that its own states could secede. Some state…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ch.14 Apush Outline

    • 3408 Words
    • 14 Pages

    * South Carolina seceded first. They called a special convention and voted unanimously on Dec. 20, 1860 to be the first state to secede from the Union.…

    • 3408 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the main unresolved issues of the Constitution was succession. The writers of this document did not consider that any state would ever wish to leave the union, and so did not address whether or not a state could secede. As a result of the Constitution's failure to address this issue, when the southern states wanted to leave the union, it was considered unconstitutional to use force to stop this uprising. James Buchanan was in support of the states' rights to leave the union if they did not feel they were properly represented. He stated in Document G, "The Southern States, standing of the basis of the Constitution, have a right to demand this act of justice from the States of the North." He also comments on the power of Congress to use force in keeping a state from succeeding, saying "... no such power has been delegated to Congress." Abraham Lincoln thought the opposite, and did not support the southern states' movement toward succession. He believes that because no state has ever been a state outside of the union, it does not have the right to…

    • 737 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When new of Lincolns’ election spread, South Carolina called a Convention to take the state out of the Union. Within the next six weeks there were six other states following suit.1 In December of 1860 there were three different positions developing in the South. The first position was “immediate secession.” This was the most drastic view because they believed each state should secede on its own and should not wait for the entire South to agree on a decision.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The south had the right to secede. They genuinely felt threatened and attacked by the north and others who were trying to take away their source of income. They made a choice that they thought was entitled to them. The South had valid reasons and it seems like the North were just threatening the South and took away their property.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We gained our independence, freedom and sovereignty from the mother country and had not surrendered these upon entering the Union; by the terms of the Constitution all rights and powers not delegated were reserved to the States. We feel a growing need for freedom from the central Federal authority in Washington D.C. We feel that each state should have state rights and make there own laws. We do not want to take over the government and run the states as the north does, but rather want a fair say in issues that concerned the…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    South Carolina’s argument was that it shouldn’t have to follow the Constitution if other states weren’t following it themselves. The Constitution was created as a whole to govern every individual states under one Declaration. In the Constitution it stated that if a slave were to runaway to another state it was that state duty to return the slave to its rightful owner. However in “ Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union,” its states “In many of these States the fugitive is discharged from service or labor claimed”. Since several northern states such as Massachusetts, New York and Rhode Island have failed to obey the Constitution South Carolina felt justified in their…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it is not directly stated in the constitution that they can, however neither is it stated that they cannot. By withdrawing from the Union, a state would effectively be denying someone who is a citizen of the United States their rights except by due process. The key there is "due process" and in this case, the state would need to find a legally recognized way to withdraw. This would either be some kind of legislation passed in Congress or an Amendment to the Constitution. Anything less will ensure a civil war and no state will win such a war.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some scholars might argue that Abraham Lincoln could have done something about slavery in the meantime. However, how would Arbham Lincoln do anything if his main priority is returning the seceded states in which there is a war over that conflict? The ongoing war was more of a priority than the issue of slavery due to slave states seceding from the Union. Lincoln wants to protect the Constitution, but in doing so he will tear the nation…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1860 Dbq Analysis

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    South Carolina had no other choice but to secede from the Union as they found this result to be unacceptable. Four months later, the people of six other states who elected Jefferson Davis ( Virginia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana) followed South Carolina’s footsteps. Later Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina, and Tennessee joined the session. In total of eleven states seceded from the Union as an outcome of Lincoln’s…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War left a great impact on the nation. President Lincoln stated that he had no intention of interfering with slavery but the south had no actual right to secede from the Union. When South Carolina was the first state to secede and other states quickly followed, Lincoln felt that he had to take matters into his own hands and enacted his power as both the Commander in Chief and the Chief Executive. We see in Document A that South Carolina felt differently about this issue. They felt that there isn't anything…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why would the southern states secede but not any other states? There were three main reasons that included issues of slavery, states’ rights, and other grievances like Lincoln’s election. Georgia, Texas, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Virginia were five out of the eleven states that wrote a “Declaration of Causes”, which explained why they seceded. Slavery was one of the more important causes of secession of the southern states. “The South with great unanimity declared her purpose to resist the principle of prohibition to the last extremity” (Council on Foreign Relations, n.d.).…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He had to keep the Union together, however, because all other nations observed America’s outcome to see if a nation of liberty could survive: it truly acted as a city on a hill. With slavery endangering America’s success, Lincoln had to enforce laws to keep the South under control, which strengthened American government. Although he did not want to fortify government simply to intimidate or oppress the South into submission, southerners worried that he did. According to the south, instead of saving the Union he abandoned the South’s “right to claim [its] property” (O). Southerners’ response to this stronger government seemed to worsen the…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Secession Dbq Essay

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    First and foremost was their concern for what they perceive as violations by the federal government in enforcing both article IV of the constitution and the requirements of the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act. Interestingly, not one state in writing their Ordinance of Secession referenced the tenth amendment which purportedly was the foundation of later arguments on states’ rights. Essentially, the states right argument supposes the states have a right to secede as all “powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States…” Although none of the seceding states in their Ordinance of Secession proclamations make any reference to their independent and sovereign status as rationalization for secession, John Grahm in his book A Constitutional History of Secession makes several references to the fact that the states maintained their independence and sovereignty as states, primarily based on their status under the Articles of Confederation. However, Grahm further supports his position that the states were independent and sovereign by referencing King George IIIs statement at the signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1783 at the conclusion of the Revolutionary War where the King referred to each state by name and claimed they be “free, sovereign, and independent states.” They were; from British…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    President of the Texas Secession, O.M. Roberts stated, “The crisis upon us involves not only the right of self government, but the maintenance of a great principle in the law of nations...the true theory, if our government as an association of sovereignties, and not a blended mass of people I one social compact.” (Document C) Also brought up in the Texas State Gazette, “This is a Union of equal states, and no state can force another state either to remain in it or withdraw from it” (Document C) Which means every state has the right to leave the country when they want, but no state can push another state out of the…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays