Who Is To Blame For The Deaths Of Romeo And Juliet
Shiv Patel
English 1
Miss Rath
10 May 2013
Love is an intense feeling of affection to not only a person but also an object. In the Shakespearean play Romeo and Juliet, Romeo Falls in love with Juliet at the first sight of her. Though the love was very strong, it was also very unanticipated. The play concluded very tragically with the deaths of both Romeo and Juliet. Many untimely and unfortunate events led up to these deaths. One being, lord Capulet’s inability to be an affectionate father, unnecessary deaths, and finally the Friars’ inability to execute plans. Though all these had great affects on the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, fate is ultimately to blame for the deaths. Primarily, lord Capulet being an ineffective father eventually causes the death of his own daughter, Juliet. Right before Juliet is able to say anything to her father regarding …show more content…
As Tybalt goes to confront Romeo and challenge Romeo, Mercutio interferes and gets killed. After he is stabbed he is able to cry, “I am hurt. A plague O’ both, your houses! I am sped. Is he gone and hath nothing?” (3.1.94-96). The death caused by Tybalt was very unnecessary. This confrontation should have been settled verbally but instead fate made it in to a physical confrontation. Mercutio’s death causes a spark. His death leads to many other adversities for Romeo and Juliet. Additionally, to avenge Mercutio’s death, Romeo soon begins to retaliate. Romeo comes out victorious, as Tybalt lay there lifelessly, benvolio shouts, “ Romeo away be gone! The citizens are up, and Tybalt slain, stand not amazed…” (5.1.141-144). Tybalt’s death was the most unnecessary death of all. If Romeo had not have killed Tybalt then the prince would have eventually would have had Tybalt be put to death. Fate is to blame for Romeo’s inferiority. If Romeo had not have killed Tybalt then the ending of the story would be completely
English 1
Miss Rath
10 May 2013
Love is an intense feeling of affection to not only a person but also an object. In the Shakespearean play Romeo and Juliet, Romeo Falls in love with Juliet at the first sight of her. Though the love was very strong, it was also very unanticipated. The play concluded very tragically with the deaths of both Romeo and Juliet. Many untimely and unfortunate events led up to these deaths. One being, lord Capulet’s inability to be an affectionate father, unnecessary deaths, and finally the Friars’ inability to execute plans. Though all these had great affects on the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, fate is ultimately to blame for the deaths. Primarily, lord Capulet being an ineffective father eventually causes the death of his own daughter, Juliet. Right before Juliet is able to say anything to her father regarding …show more content…
As Tybalt goes to confront Romeo and challenge Romeo, Mercutio interferes and gets killed. After he is stabbed he is able to cry, “I am hurt. A plague O’ both, your houses! I am sped. Is he gone and hath nothing?” (3.1.94-96). The death caused by Tybalt was very unnecessary. This confrontation should have been settled verbally but instead fate made it in to a physical confrontation. Mercutio’s death causes a spark. His death leads to many other adversities for Romeo and Juliet. Additionally, to avenge Mercutio’s death, Romeo soon begins to retaliate. Romeo comes out victorious, as Tybalt lay there lifelessly, benvolio shouts, “ Romeo away be gone! The citizens are up, and Tybalt slain, stand not amazed…” (5.1.141-144). Tybalt’s death was the most unnecessary death of all. If Romeo had not have killed Tybalt then the prince would have eventually would have had Tybalt be put to death. Fate is to blame for Romeo’s inferiority. If Romeo had not have killed Tybalt then the ending of the story would be completely