Preview

Who is a better speaker? Old Major or Squealer? Explain your answer.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
626 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who is a better speaker? Old Major or Squealer? Explain your answer.
LA- Who is a better speaker? Old Major or Squealer? Explain your answer. I think that Old Major is a better speaker than Squealer. A good speaker is someone who speaks fluently, someone who can convince others that what he says is right, and someone who is able to convey his message clearly to others. Old Major has fulfilled all these aspects and also speaks truthfully. On the other hand, Squealer speaks in order to instill fear in the animals’ hearts and thus fear Napoleon, hence submitting to the pig’s orders and instructions. Squealer is not truthful like Old Major, and he develops lies of deceit to deceive the animals. Although the animals listen to what both Old Major and Squealer say, they listen to Old Major because of his experience and truthfulness, but they listen to Squealer because they are fearful and scared of the consequences they will face if they do not listen to him. All these show that Old Major is a better speaker than Squealer. Old Major is a much better speaker than Squealer as he is firstly, able to get the animals’ attention with the right purpose on mind. All that he has in mind for the animals is good, and is for the better of the animals. His message to the animals of the Rebellion was truthful and the animals’ would all benefit from the Rebellion. They would no longer be slaves to Man and would be free animals. However, Squealer speaks in a way that benefits Napoleon and the pigs, and does not even bother about the animals. All the good things he tells the animals are all utterly lies, which he carefully plots and deceives the animals with his pleasant and persuasive words. Another aspect that Old Major has fulfilled is his directness. I feel that he can quickly and clearly direct his message to the animals quickly, and all the animals understand what he says and means. As for Squealer, he plays with the animals, leading them in a maze that goes round and round. Only the smartest of them understood what he really meant. After he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Here, Squealer convinces the animals that the pigs eating the apples and milk is justified by using the animals’ fear of Farmer Jones returning to his advantage. Already , the society is not ideal because the pigs are essentially deceiving the other animals so that they can have the most comfortable life possible. Later, the pigs go even farther by deliberately changing the written rules of the society. After hearing rumors about the pigs sleeping in beds and recalling that animals…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Squealer has all the animals believing propaganda, and it brainwashed them, and made them feel as if nothing is wrong on the farm. The number one reason why Squealer is now also corrupt is because of Napoleon’s self corruption. Squealer lets Napoleon order him around because if he didn’t do so, he would probably be killed or harmed. Squealer lies for Napoleon, as he said, “Snowball has sold himself to Frederick of Pinchfield Farm…”, (Orwell 118). Squealer had no choice, but to let Napoleon control him, otherwise he would have been harmed or killed, and no good would have come out of it.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additionally he also uses Ethos to get his point across. When it was discovered that Snowball was coming to the farm at night, Squealer had to make sure they thought it was him. “Snowball was in league with Jones from the very start!”(55). This is a good example because even though some of the animals disagree, Squealer continues to push the idea. By this he shows that even with doubt, he makes their disagreements dissolve away. During the…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Okay. In the book The Animal Farm Squealer, the pig, shows some extremely complex characteristics. His ability to persuade the animals to do or believe anything is incredible. Squealer got even the animals to believe that Napoleon was a good leader, which we all know is not true, for multiple years. I believe Orwell created Squealer to get us to understand how manipulated the people of Russia were, in these times. Orwell writes “…Squealer would talk with tears rolling down his cheeks… “, showing squealer has knowledge of literary devices and how to use them (Orwell100). Obviously Squealer is cunning and full of himself knowing that he is smarter than the other animals.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He tries to use logic when saying that the animals in charge that are doing none of the work, but all the thinking for the farm, need more food than those working hard and starving. The reasoning is not really a good reason for what Napoleon and him are wanting to do, but the animals on the farm don't know any better, they aren't educated. So, in the end, all the animals always believe what ever Napoleon has to say, or Squealer in that matter. They believe them because everything they are saying seem to make sense to them, when in reality, none of it would actually make sense to an educated person. He also uses pathos in also all…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manipulative, persuasive, and cunning are all words that can be used to describe Squealer. In the book, Animal Farm he’s described as a fat pig with a shrill voice, nimble movements, and a brilliant talker. Squealer has a way with words. He’s good at talking and getting people to see his way. He can change people’s perspective on things. “The others said of Squealer that he could turn black into white” (Orwell 16). Persuasion comes easily to Squealer. He knows just what to say to get someone on the same page as him. He can make people see one thing as something completely different. Squealer uses As well as persuasive, Squealer is also manipulative. “Surely none of you wishes to see Jones back” (67)? By saying things that the animals don’t…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The others said of Squealer that he could turn black into white” (2.2). In general, Orwell produces an honest introduction of Squealer’s oral abilities. Throughout the book, his adept oral skills not only penetrate, but alter the accusations, and psychology of the other animals, as indicated by the words“he could turn black into white.” Squealer’s name derives from his primary method of vocalization, squealing, similar to Orwell’s portrayal of a having “a shrill voice” and his tendency to spray nonsense into his opposing audience. As a mouthpiece of Napoleon’s regime, Squealer swiftly rises to power, alongside Napoleon, because of his quick mind, and his nimble…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the novella, Animal Farm, Squealer persuades the animals to do what Napoleon tells them using pathos in all of his speeches. Squealer being Napoleons assistant in a sense, abuses language to justify Napoleon’s actions and policies to the masses by whatever means seem necessary. But Squealer must manipulate the animal’s emotions to convince them. Throughout the story Squealer uses, fear, guilt, and hatred to persuade the animals.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In George Orwell's Animal Farm, power and control of the farm shifts from Mr. Jones to Snowball and from Snowball to Napoleon. Each, no matter how well their leadership, was corrupted by power in some way as compared to Russian leaders of the time. The most corrupt, Napoleon, uses several methods of gaining more power and luxury.<br><br>Like Stalin, Napoleon uses a Propaganda Department to make himself look good. The one responsible for Napoleon's looking good and propaganda is Squealer. With a name like Squealer he better be damn good using his wits to Napoleon's and the pigs' advantage. In the seventh chapter, Squealer responds to Boxer's question of whether Snowball fought bravely at the Battle of the Cowshed by making Snowball look deceiving.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire In Animal Farm

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Because of his cleverness and superior vocabulary, Squealer attracts many farm animals, who begin to trust him and allow him to brainwash them without questioning. For instance, Squealer convinces the farm animals that apples and milk should be only consumed by the pigs because the regular animals are replaceable. On the contrary, the pigs, who are the "brain workers" are the foundation of the well-being of all animals on the farm, and without the pigs, Mr. Jones, the former owner of the farm, would come back. This simple act instills low self-esteem in the animals who do not understand their power on the farm. Since the uneducated animals forgot their lifestyle when Mr. Jones owned them, Squealer reads false statistics with incorrect information to make the animals believe that they have larger rations and an improved lifestyle. Exploiting the trust the animals have given him, Squealer modifies the original seven commandments to benefit the pigs, but when questioned, claims the memories of the animals were at fault. As a leader, he alters history for Napolean's benefit. In the Battle of the Cowshed, a battle in which Mr. Jones tried to regain control of the farm again, Squealer changes the story by stating Snowball, or Trotsky, allied with Mr. Jones, and Napolean fought the humans. However, this…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “….Comrade Napoleon has made in taking his extra labour upon himself.Do not imagine comrade that leadership is a pleasure…” (pp.56) His duty is changing and manipulating the commandments by using tactics and tricky language.By complicating language he tries to confuse uneducated animals.Also,animals’ inability and unwillingness to question authority makes it easy for the pigs to reach their aim.Squealer’s loyalty to his leader and his rhetorical skills made him the perfect propagandist for any tyranny.There is an interesting fact that Squealer’s name also fits him well because to squeal means to betray so his name defines his…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manipulation, propaganda, and inciting fear were some of his main skills that he used against the animals. In spite of what most of the animals feared, Squealer would say “Surely none of you wishes to see Jones Back?” (Orwell 67). This would instigate the fear in the animals and essentially make them believe whatever Squealer wanted them to. Squealer would also be “skipping around and whisking his tail with a merry laugh.” (Orwell 58). This makes him seem confident and that there is no need to further question what is actually happening. Without the capability to persuade and influence easily, he would not have been as useful to Napoleon or his role in the story.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Outline

    • 426 Words
    • 1 Page

    Point 2: Squealer uses propaganda to persuade the other animals that the pigs should keep all the apples and milk.…

    • 426 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, Squealer displayed language manipulation throughout the novel. For instance, when the animals in the farm discovered that the milk and the apples were disappearing, it turned out that the milk and the apples were gone to the pigs. Later, Squealer started manipulating with words when he said to the animals in the farm, “Comrades! You do not imagine, I hope, that we pigs are doing this in a spirit of selfishness and privilege? Many of us actually dislike milk and apples. I dislike them myself” (Orwell,…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “You do not imagine, I hope, that we pigs are doing this in the spirit of selfishness and privilege?..It is for your sake that we drink milk and those apples...Do you know what would happen if we pigs failed in our duty? Mr. Jones would come back.” (Orwell 26). Squealer, under the rule of the pigs, is not only convincing the animals to let them have the milk and apples by misleading them to believe they are the only ones who need the milk and apples. But also threatening the animals of their previous problem, their abusive owner from before, Mr. Jones. This pig may be like some humans, as he would deceive someone into believing they are helping, but the…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics