About 10 years ago I had an epiphany and realized the things which for so many years had been heralded as fact are indeed untrue. Chief amongst these being that Bush was responsible for 9/11. See it became abundantly clear to me that jet fuel could not melt steel beams.
As I realized the error in my ways I looked up “just how does jet fuel melt steel beams?”. And to my surprise I found no information on how it occurs only that it simply doesn't. There is no way in which a plane could've destroyed the ol twin towers. It must've been a man with things to gain.
First I looked to al Gore as a likely culprit with his anger over losing the election but then soon realized what does ol Al have to gain? He …show more content…
Iraq was oil rich however had no real connection. Dick Cheney made money via giving his company (Halliburton) contracts for defense and rolling in the …show more content…
Certainly. Was it bush? Also certainly. However the reasoning is very profound for this as he made money. As is the evidence abundant. World Trade Center 7 was also brought down on that day, a building without any fire damage at all. One may ask what can be gained from such an event by the building owners, Larry Silverstein the owner had opened a multi-billion dollar insurance policy on the complex which covered explicitly bombings and terrorism.
The 9/11 report tells us a skewed and false government propaganda tale much like that of the warren commission investigating the inside job of kennedy's murder. That however is for another day at another time. This has shaped my worldview greatly, making me understand that we must not trust our government nor go to war over anything without proof. Our government under the corporate ruling elite has always lied since they killed Kennedy and always will until more people have a moment like myself and realize that bush did 9/11 and open the rabbit hole into