Preview

Why abortion is morally wrong

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1412 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why abortion is morally wrong
No matter how you slice it, abortion is morally wrong. Although that should not be misinterpreted for a pro-life stance on abortion because there are numerous circumstances that must be considered in each situation. Just because abortion is morally impermissible, it does not mean that society will deem you a bad person for getting an abortion under extreme circumstances. For that reason, abortion is a specifically tricky topic to discuss. There is no clear-cut answer as to whether or not abortion should be allowed and because of that the government should not downright illegalize abortion. Following Don Marquis’ ideology, I agree that abortion is morally wrong because it deprives a being of a valuable future. In order to create a strong argument I will also be addressing the views of philosopher Judith Thomson.
In Don Marquis’ article Why Abortion is Immoral, he makes the argument that abortion is on the same plane of immorality as killing an adult human. Marquis reasons this by explaining what is wrong with killing is that you are depriving someone of a future. He goes on to explain that you deprive them of a future of experiences, achievements, relationships, etc. Importantly, he notes that this does not only apply to humans but rather to all species, or anything with a future of value for that matter. Furthermore, Marquis says that having a valuable future is not a necessary condition for killing to be immoral, but it is a sufficient reason, and that having a valuable future is not the only reason that killing a being could be wrong. Essentially, Marquis offers one explanation as to why killing could be immoral while clarifying that it could be one of many reasons for killing to be immoral.
Marquis then connects this idea with abortion by saying that aborting a fetus is depriving a being of a valuable future. Regardless of what pro-choice or pro-life views somebody might have, the bottom line is that the fetus has the potential for a valuable future and


References: Marquis, Don. “Why Abortion Is Immoral.” N.p., 1989. Web. 08 May 2014. <https://myelms.umd.edu/courses/1056989/files/32707184?module_item_id=7195906>. Warren, Mary Anne. “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion.” N.p., 1973. Web. 08 May 2014. <https://myelms.umd.edu/courses/1056989/files/31386874?module_item_id=7083927>.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Relationship Between Thompson's 'And Marquis' Argument
    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Relationship Between Thompson's 'And Marquis' Argument

    1 )The relationship between Thompson’s and Marquis’ arguments are very different, but I believe both are compatible with each other. They both take the personhood out of the question, so there is no debate on if the fetus is a human in the womb. Marquis discusses voluntary conception and Thompson does not really discuss that. Thompson’s conclusion deals more with the exceptional cases that Marquis doesn’t explain at all. Thompson weighs the rights of the individuals involved in the pregnancy like the mother and fetus against each other. Marquis, on the other hand, focuses on the concept of what makes killing wrong thus killing a fetus that could possibly have a future like ours is bad. His conclusion focuses on the rights of the victim in the mother/fetus situation. The mortality of the situation in both arguments deals with which person’s rights out ways the other’s. In Marquis, the fetus’ rights outweigh the mother’s rights. In Thompson’s argument, the mother’s rights can trump the fetus’ rights in certain circumstance.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Summary and Critique of Don Maquis- Anti-Abortion Argument
    • 2022 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Summary and Critique of Don Maquis- Anti-Abortion Argument

    When he compiles his argument he begins by providing the argument for a ‘pro-choice’ approach which makes the assumption that a fetus is a being but one who's life is not ethically applicable and can be ended without moral consequence. This gives us an insight into the apparent symmetry between this set of ideals in contrast with the beliefs of the ‘anti-abortion’ approach which views a fetus as a being, ones who’s life is ethically applicable and cannot be ended without moral consequence. The conflicting issue being weather or not a fetus falls under the category of a morally applicable ‘sentient being’ and this, in turn, is what Marquis sets out to confirm in order to create a solid case for the ‘anti-abortion’ approach.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Tomson And Marquis On Abortion
    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Tomson And Marquis On Abortion

    Then, we also saw some good examples of why Marquis’ examples such as the loss of future of a fetus. One of Tomson’s view on abortion that I never thought about was, if the baby…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Don Marquis Abortion Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Don Marquis Abortion Rhetorical Analysis

    In this argument, right to life is closely connected with the future- a future like ours concept. We might be tempted to ask what is so unique about our future?! What does the future hold for us?! Our future consists of unique experiences- either good or bad, different activities, pleasures and accumulation of knowledge and etc. All of these experiences have value to us. Sometimes we might not value things that are going to happen in our future because we might think that our future is unknown. For Marquis, the future has value independent of whether or not it is recognized by the person or the fetus. For instance, a suicidal teenager might not see any value to her future but Marquis would maintain that her future has value. Having a future like ours alone is enough of a reason for Marquis to put human fetus under the umbrella of morality, which in this case is, in fact, connected to the issue of killing or aborting the embryo. He is approaching the morality of abortion from the future like ours perspective but not from genealogical or biological factors about the embryo. So a being can have a future like ours but not be a person. For instance, we can also apply this concept to a newborn baby or a toddler. A newborn baby or a toddler doesn’t have the conceptual capacity of an adult human but he/she has a future like ours. So Marquis holds that one can have a future like ours even…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Don Marquis's Essay 'Why Abortion Is Immoral'
    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Don Marquis's Essay 'Why Abortion Is Immoral'

    Marquis believes that abortion is “morally unjustified” (525). His argument is that “it is wrong to kill us because such killing deprives us of all the value of our futures” (525). He also argues that fetuses are close enough to being like us and that is it just as wrong to kill them as it is to kill us. The conclusion of his argument is that not all abortions are wrong since there may be other conditions in some cases such as “abortion before implantation, when the life of the woman is threatened by a pregnancy or abortion and abortion after rape”…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Henry Marquis On Abortion
    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Henry Marquis On Abortion

    By showcasing that murder of an adult human is immoral, Marquis connects this to abortion that he terms as the killing of a fetus. Marquis decribes a standard fetus as: “loss of the future to a standard fetus, if killed, is however, at least as great a loss as the loss of the future to a standard adult human being who is killed”(Marquis.7). A standard fetus is a fetus that would lead…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Abortion Is Immoral Don Marquis Summary
    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Abortion Is Immoral Don Marquis Summary

    In “Why abortion is immoral,” by Don Marquis, Marquis sets out an argument that abortion is “seriously immoral that it is in the same moral category as killing an innocent adult human being.” Marquis first wants us to understand why killing a person is wrong. He presents us with an argument that the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses one can suffer. Because this prevents a person from having a valuable human future, a future like ours. What makes killing any adult human being wrong? If a person is killed all the experience, activities, projects, and enjoyment would be deprive from a person future. Therefore, Marquis believe that killing is one of the worst of crimes because their future is taken away along with their life.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Don Marquis Abortion Analysis
    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Don Marquis Abortion Analysis

    Marquis gives a definition of abortion as being “an action intended to bring about the death of a fetus for the sake of the woman who carries it.” Marquis says that both sides of the argument can agree that everyone has a right to life. His question then becomes what it is that makes a person be identified as a person. He gives the criteria for being a person is simply being identified as biologically human. He argues that statement saying that, that criteria is too broad and his example of that is human cancer cells being identified under that criteria. Human cancer cells are obviously not something given rights thus making the criteria too broad. An example of a narrow definition consists of the points that personhood consists of “having a concept of self that persists through time, desires its continued existence, and is can set goals for future life and how to achieve those goals.” Obviously a fetus is not developed to have those abilities so it crosses that argument as too…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Marquis's Arguments Against Abortion
    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marquis's Arguments Against Abortion

    By treating the fetus as a person, she takes into account the rights of both the mother and the fetus. However, she doesn’t base her arguments on possible futures, like Marquis- instead she compares their situations (one party growing within, the other being forced to house it), personal rights, and responsibilities to one another (if any). What was particularly convincing to me about her argument was how she argued that abortion does not need to be decent or unselfish to be morally permissible. This removes a lot of the responsibility of a mother to keep an unwanted fetus just to be a “good person”, rather than end their unwanted pregnancy. Thompson’s definition of the right to life was also significant to me.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Marquis Arguments Against Abortion
    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marquis Arguments Against Abortion

    Marquis stated in his writing “Clearly, it is wrong to kill adult human beings. Clearly, it is not wrong to end the life of some arbitrarily chosen single human cell. Fetuses seem to be like arbitrarily chosen human cells in some respects and like adult humans in other respects.” (Wolff pg. 361). Marquis thus suggest that a proper contention for an anti-abortionist (Value of the future account) must be founded on the theory that if someone is not afforded the ‘opportunity’ to experience certain gains or projects due to the negligence/actions of others then whomever is responsible for the loss of that person’s life is in fact morally…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Marquis On Abortion
    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Marquis On Abortion

    Marquis argues that killing a fetus deprives it of a valuable future/future like ours, and concludes by saying abortion is not morally permissible. I agree with Marquis’s argument that it is wrong to kill a fetus through abortion because I believe that they have a valuable future as all humans do. Abortion is defined as the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, which is most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. (dictionary.com) Furthermore I do agree with Marquis that majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral, however I do believe that in some cases it is permissible, for instance choosing to have an abortion after being sexually assaulted or due to life threatening circumstances.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Why Abortion Is Wrong
    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On Why Abortion Is Wrong

    Abortion by definition is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. Wrong! Abortion simply means murder. Right! Abortion is just wrong. In what way would abortion be right? “...all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” that was taken straight out of the Declaration of Independence. For those who do not know unalienable rights are, those are rights that can not be given away or taken; there for your creator by creating you gave you the right to life.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Controversy Of Abortion
    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Ethical Controversy Of Abortion

    Whether it's called a foetus or a baby, a form of life is destroyed which deepens the importance of the issue and its…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Warren's Argument Against Abortion
    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Warren's Argument Against Abortion

    This argument is easily rebutted, and Janet Hadley argues against it by claiming that the potential for personhood does not equal moral value, “How far back does potentiality go–to the individual sperm or egg? No anti-abortion advocate have yet proposed rescuing eggs or sperm in order to save lives” (Hadley,68) Hadley and other pro-abortion advocates are correct in this argument, however, they fail to realize why killing a fetus is actually wrong. Philosopher Don Marquis, in his famous work, Why Abortion is Wrong, gives an explanation of why death is undesirable, “The loss of one’s life deprives one of all the experiences, activities, projects, and enjoyments that would otherwise have constituted one’s future.” Marquis goes on to explain that this is why abortion is immoral, because it takes away the potential experiences and future that the child will have. (Marqus) But it is not wrong because of the fetus’ potential personhood, but it is already a person and killing it would rob it of it’s future…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Abortion Is Wrong To Kill A Fetus
    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Abortion Is Wrong To Kill A Fetus

    The fetus’s potential of what it will be in the future (Lee 2015). Killing a fetus is killing an adult human being due to the potential of what it could be. According to this logic, killing an adult human being is wrong, therefore, it is wrong to kill a fetus. Killing an innocent person because their existence in the world would make the killer’s life miserable is homicide and can’t be justified (Lee 2015). A proposed way to look at it is, to kill our boss because he makes your life miserable and intolerable and you can’t find another job is not a justified reason to kill your boss(Lee 2015). In this example, your boss is the fetus and just because the fetus will make your life intolerable is not grounds for having an abortion (Lee 2015). To abort a fetus is the loss of that person’s future, specifically, all the value of that future. A fetus can be said to have a future and potential therefore, killing a fetus is wrong. It is just as bad as killing an adult human being which is illegal (Marquis 2014).…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics