Preview

Why, and to What Extent, Have Conservatives Been Committed to Tradition and Continuity?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
752 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why, and to What Extent, Have Conservatives Been Committed to Tradition and Continuity?
Why, and to what extent, have conservatives been committed to tradition and continuity?

Conservatism was a reaction to all other ideologies. It believed in conserving the best of the past and governing society with reform, not revolution. In the French revolution there was a lot of uncertainty because people did not know what to do afterward and they ended up in a worse position then they were before. Conservatives believe that humans are; psychologically imperfect, which means that we are security seeking creatures who dislike change. They believe we are intellectually imperfect which means we are incapable of acting rationally and are very instinctive. They believe we are morally imperfect which means we are born sinful and conservatists have a profound scepticism about our natural goodness.

Conservatives have always been committed to tradition, ever since Toryism was first formed. They only believe in slow change which relates to peoples changing views and opinions like the English Legal System. Because they believe we are psychologically imperfect, they don’t want us to undergo any uncertainty whatsoever and so they dislike revolution because even though people may have a ‘better’ idea of how things should work, it has not yet had the test of time and so there is no need for risk. Conservatives believe society is like a living organism i.e. a tree, so it needs to reach out to both the past and the future and cannot be severed from its roots to survive. Since individuals lack wisdom, tradition is a better test of goodness and virtue, as Edmund Burke said, ‘the accumulated wisdom of the ages as the heritage of society is the best source of virtue and goodness’.

Conservatists are pragmatic, which fits into their commitment for continuity, they are not opposed to change, but question it and only accepts slow, specific, evolutionary change. Conservatists preserve the best and change what is essential. Tories changed to Conservatories because they needed to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Angel Breard Case Summary

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Conservatives is defined as “holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, in relation to politics or religion.” (Oxford, Dictionary). Free market and…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apush Chapter 23 Summary

    • 3860 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Conservatives: the political group who wanted to restore a strong family, traditional religious values, patriotism, and limited government…

    • 3860 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The description of a set of beliefs as "liberal" or "conservative" is a task that, in history, has changed in its requirements and protocol. We would now consider beliefs to be conservative that were at the onset of the American experiment considered liberal. Free markets, limited government, and federalism were ideas that were ridiculed throughout most of the civilized countries of the west up until recent history. On the other hand, what we would now consider to be modern liberalism can’t well be described in a similar fashion: Hobbes’ style of conservatism and its antidemocratic and autocratic impulses, while always the end result of collectivist tendencies such as modern liberalism, don’t translate completely into FDR’s style of governance and the Left’s penchant for social democracy (though Hobbes would appreciate the control that central planning entails). Modern liberalism, like modern conservatism, can be traced to a form of liberal thought. In modern liberalism’s case, though, it is rooted in continental European thought such as French Revolution radicalism and subsequent collectivist ideologies (devoted more to equality and a concept of "change") than in conservatism’s bedrock, more individualist Anglo Saxon thought. Thus, when referring to "conservative" and "liberal", the reference will be to the modern manifestations of such.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are four key principles in which currently influence modern politics and the direction of the current coalition. Firstly, Paternalism; One nation conservatism is about the stronger (richer) looking after the weaker (poorer) There is the idea behind this principle of a father looking after a son. An example of this principle having influence within the coalition is Cameron handing out and protecting free TV licenses and bus passes for the elderly. This principle clearly contrast with Thatcherites view on helping the poor, whom argue that people should help themselves and not to rely on others to help them. Overall on the principle of Paternalism I believe that the modern conservative party can be considered ‘One nation’ as although the coalition have had to make cuts due to the size and state of the deficit, cuts have included removing educational maintenance from a large number of students to help with the costs of sixth form study.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apush Chapter 1 Summary

    • 4510 Words
    • 19 Pages

    -Conservative: A person who believes in limiting government spending, preserving traditional patterns of relationships, and that big government is a threat to personal liberties…

    • 4510 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oakeshott describes conservatism as an observation to enjoy our current ways to living life, be that of his time. He mentions how conservative disposition in politics is not necessarily connected with any beliefs about religion, theory nor the universe (Oakeshott, 1975, pp.153-154). But how is conservatism an ideology? For starters, an unbiased analysis would be hard to attain since it’s mostly conservatives themselves who write about conservatism (Muller, 2006, p. 359). However, I believe it is an ideology and the first reason being that is because many writers describe, analyse and explain “conservatism” as an ideology. Let’s look at the sociological point of view, where conservatism is described as an ideology or political principles of a specific social group, trying to prolong and conserve their prerogatives (Muller, 2006, p. 361). When compared to theories of conservatism section in “Conservatism as an Ideology” by Samuel P. Huntington, he writes “Aristocratic theory defines conservatism as the ideology of a single unique and specific historical movement…” (Huntington, 1957). This implies that the origin behind conservatism is based from certain principle and ideas that a specific group of people hold to, making it an…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are arguments that the American Revolution was a radical movement, meaning that it making economic, political, or social changes of a sweeping or extreme nature, but it was conservative. Conservative means to be in favor of preserving the status quo and traditional values and customs, and against abrupt change.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Daniel J. Boorsten argued that the revolution was conservative on the imperial as well as the local level because Americans were fighting to retain traditional rights and…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For instance, the new left demanded freedom and peace now by taking immediate action while the new rights took the approach of “patience”, thinking past the present and how the present affects the future. The new left sought power in the form of actions and not so much its organizations. While the new right believed that power came from a position, political office, or a job. Unlike the liberal, the conservatives did not suffer from a generation age gap. The younger conservatives respected the older conservatives and their ideas. The younger conservatives seek the older conservatives for guidance and help. Conservatives were directed towards the white-collar employed. Anticommunist was a highly important stance for the conservative party in the 1960s. Conservatives are often described as the party that goes the old-fashion way. Conservatives also strongly believed in the idea that since everyone was different this meant that everyone should have different rewards and…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The term Fiscal Conservative is broad term used to describe the group of Republican’s whose ideologies fall in line with traditional right wing economic and fiscal policy. This can be furthered to those who are associated with the Tea Party movement on the populist right and it is important to remember that the majority of Republicans are fiscally conservative in some sense. Furthermore, it can be noted that most fiscal conservatives fall under the same ideology as social conservatives when it comes to the social issues that the social conservatives concern themselves with.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    These individuals do like change, sounds pretty much like most Texans. Social conservatism is the idea of preserving old tradition. In general, they like to keep what was, what is today. Social conservatives are also wishy washy, they will vote or agree with the party that is willing to keep the tradition. So, in other words, I would say that social conservatives are somewhat loyal. In contemporary forms, social conservatives tend to support the use of government to reinforce traditional social relations. (p. 3) They also value established traditions, religious beliefs and practices, and respect traditional authority figures such as business, military, and religious leaders. (p.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    On the subject of religion, conservatives do believe in a deity, or something similar of that nature. A deity could exist because of religious faith or simply because they do not trust human nature. By acknowledging God as a higher power, conservatives believe that this allows man and government to hold Him accountable for their actions and mistakes. And in doing so, this places a supreme law that “rules society as well as conscience, forging an eternal chain of right and duty which links great and obscure, living and dead.” (Story and Laurie, 47) which prevent man and government from having free reign. When government tries to implement laws that are contradictory to divine law, conservatives seek to challenge the validity of those said laws.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For example; Conservative stated "Abortion is the murder of a human being. An unborn baby, as a living human being, has separate rights from those of the mother." I have a strong opinion about abortion and it should be abolish for good. Personally, I blame Margret Sanger for encouraging the practice of abortion, which still exist today! I may not be a women, but if i was in…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    James Farney describes North American conservatism as an ideology focused on reacting to progressivism, resisting any changes from the perceived natural and historical. The three major areas of change that concern conservatives are the breakdown of the community, the breakdown of laissez-faire capitalism, and the breakdown of traditional family and gender roles. Each of these concerns maps onto one of the three branches of modern conservatism: traditionalists are primarily concerned with the community, laissez-faire conservatives (fiscal conservatives) are primarily concerned with government intervention into the economy and the social conservatives are primarily concerned with the changing nature of gender and family roles. Of these three…

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems to be the case that the American Revolution was a conservative revolution, or at least more conservative than revolutions in places such as France and Russia. There was no social class upheaval, no “terror” like the one in France, and no dramatic redistribution of wealth and land. In fact, the Revolution was a rather expected and natural event of human history. Part of this has to do with the enlightened age. Enlightened people were thinking of themselves as individuals who could use reason to solve problems. They also saw themselves as people with inalienable rights of life, liberty and property. In fact, by 1760, a good amount of colonials already had a liberal mindset that resulted in a revolution that was going to happen anyway. The revolution was more of a result of a new way of thinking, rather than a radical movement in and of itself.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays