Preview

Why Anthropocentric Is Wrong

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
760 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Anthropocentric Is Wrong
To say I am biocentric would be wrong. To say I am anthropocentric would be wrong too. Lastly, to say I am completely ecocentric would also be wrong. I believe that there is a balance between each worldview that benefits all without fully discrediting the other. We need to take care of the earth and all on it, but we also should make our time on earth worthwhile.
Killing an animal is not what people should be afraid of, it is one of the most common acts in the animal kingdom. We should not feel guilty for slaughtering an organism, we should feel guilty for being disconnected from our dominance over what we eat. While reading the book The Omnivores Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals by Michael Pollan, I realised how much more peoples’
…show more content…
Our greed is what makes us so successful in the animal kingdom, but it is also our biggest fault. It is destroying us and our environment. Our desire for cheap food has caused an ironic impact on humans; in 2000, the UN reported that a billion people have overnutrition (Pollan 102). We have a right to be fed, but a responsibility to not eat too much. The controversy lies in that we want cheap food but want to be healthy; to fight our lazy expectation of food to just fall onto our plate, we need to bring our connection to our food closer. Besides causing more obesity, industrial meat also creates more dangerous bacteria such as E.coli and has a huge environmental footprint. Animal production in the United States produces, in dry weight, 133 million tons of manure per year, which is 13 times more than human waste (Burkholder). In addition, when a primary consumer (i.e. cow) is separated from their producer (i.e.corn) in CAFOs, it breaks the self-sufficient nutrient cycle. In comparison to CAFOs “pasture-based systems take advantage of the animal’s ability to feed itself and spread its own manure.” (Sustainable). Our human greed has blinded us, we ignore our role as part of nature and we try to control it to quench our “need” for cheap food. We do not need to abandon meat, we need to revert to a sustainable pastoral system.
I believe in a more ecocentric view than either anthropocentric or biocentric. To be biocentric is ironically selfish as it accuses people being and acting human, but it is necessary to limit our greed and cruelty over animals. Also to be anthropocentric is selfish as it denies being part of nature, but we do have a right to live and to eat. We need a balance where the environment is the main focus, but without stretching to the extremes of holding humanity down or abusing the animals and world we live

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Lisa Hamilton’s “Unconventional Farmers; Let Them Eat Meat”, she justifies the issue of raising livestock for food causing greenhouse gas emissions. Should we be eating less meat or actually eating more? Hamilton’s research found many interesting points that would interest any human beings that consume meat or any other type of consumable goods.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    SUBJECT: In this chapter of The Omnivore’s Dilemma, titled “The Feedlot: Making Meat”, Michael Pollan discusses the use of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO), and the factories where countless cattle are being mistreated day in and day out.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Personally, if you really want my opinion, I believe that humans should not be interfering with nature just because we will have less space or that it will…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    David Suzuki basically uses the metaphor that the earth in this instance is an organism and also self regulated, as is the human body. The metaphor is basically saying that we should treat and take care of the earth like we would our own body because by doing that the planet Earth might actually be in better shape. One of the best examples of tone that is being persuasive that he really knows what he is talking about is “we have expanded beyond the capacity of our surroundings to support you. It is clear from the history of the past two centuries that the path we embark on after the Industrial Revolution is leading us increasingly into conflict with the natural world” (430). This line is very meaningful in the way that he shows us that we are expanding too fast and our resources are diminishing. By saying “We can’t manage our impact on the environment if we are our surroundings. Indigenous people are absolutely correct; we are born of the earth and constructed from the four sacred elements of earth, air, fire and water” (432). He points out the four sacred elements in a very creative way to get the reader to really understand that without them there is nothing and there cant be environment without us humans too. The voice and emphasis he puts in his writing makes the content he says believable and without that the writing wouldn’t come together so…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 1

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    |Ecocentrism |is a term used in ecological political philosophy to denote a nature-centered, as opposed to human-centered, system of values |…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    watchmen vs dark knight

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Environmental safety is the most important issue to be considered in this modern life. Joseph Pace in this article talks about how Animal-based agriculture is one of the most environmentally destructive industries on the face of the earth.Pace also talks about how the lands would be if people shifted away from meat.He…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Omnivore’s Dilemma, by Michael Pollan, attempts to figure out how such a simple question as, “What should we have for dinner?” (Pollan 1), turned out to be so complicated such that we need investigative journalists to tell us what is in our food. To do so, he went on a journey to follow all three food chains that sustain us today: the industrial, the organic, and the hunter-gatherer back to their origins. Although these journeys may have led to very different paths, there was one underlying theme that linked them all: the tension between logic of nature and industry. For every step industrialization takes, natural forces push it back to balance it out. Even so, industrialization has found a way to keep up with nature’s work by breaking through its cycle in order to thrive and profit. The work of industry is undeniably compelling. The Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) alone has made meat so cheap and abundant that most American families can afford to eat it every meal. Industry makes this happen by feeding cows and steers large amounts of cheap federally subsidized corn, which the cows never evolved to eat. The result of this poor diet is simply a hoard of sick cows due to the acidity the corn produces in their stomachs. To counteract this problem, industries turned to antibiotics. Medicines that were created to treat diseases are now a staple ingredient in a cows’ fodder, as an attempt to treat this acidic imbalance. Pollan explained the irony in this situation: “Here the drugs are plainly being used to treat sick animals, yet the animals probably wouldn’t be sick if not for the diet of grain we feed them.” (“The Feedlot: Making Meat” pg. 79) The power of industry lies in its ability to manipulate and twist the work of nature and to break closed cycles within nature. It has stripped the evolution of the rumen and its relationship with grass and has transformed cows into corn-fed machines. However, it doesn’t…

    • 1829 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hoffman and Derr

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hoffman argues that nature has intrinsic value meaning it has value in and of itself. He is supportive of the bio centric ethic which includes all things which are alive or are integral parts of the ecosystem as deserving moral consideration. Hoffman is very critical of the homocentric view which believes that the environment is only as valuable as we make it. Meaning that things are based deemed valuable only if they are beneficial to human well being and development. Hoffman associates the homocentric view to “human chauvism” which would argue that human beings are the only subjects of moral consideration and have intrinsic value.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sci/362 Week 1

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The interdisciplinary study of how humanity interacts with other organisms and the nonliving physical environment.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The Carnivore’s Dilemma”, an essay by Nicolette Hanh Niman, incorporates rhetorical elements, such as logos, ethos, and rhetorical questions, in an attempt to convince the audience that meat itself is not the root of global warming. Written from a rancher’s point of view, the essay relies on studies and logic to prove itself. Niman starts out with a short acknowledgement that the meat industry has a hand in the increasingly noticeable global climate change. She then quickly changes gears, stating that the studies that show the meat industry is a major player in global warming only take the prevailing methods of producing meat into account and spews facts that show the flip side of the food industry.…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Omnivore Diet Benefits

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Industrial farmers appear to be more concerned with massive profit margins, than they do with producing quality food in providing meat and vegetables: “The cruelty of the factory farms—the cages are small, the slaughter is violent” (Foer 67). Spiritually, I cannot tolerate the brutal methods of animal treatment, which industrial ranchers and meat producers tend to follow in the 21st century. Therefore, it is important to follow an ethical version of the Standard American Diet, which provide the healthiest and most ethical production of food for human health. I believe that all living things should be treated with respect and reverence for what they provide, which sustains my own life through the sacrifice of their own. These are important aspects of the omnivore diet, which can be sustainable in the modern world. I follow a code of ethics in terms of how animals should be processed for consumption. The problem with eating meat is not necessarily eating the meat itself; it is respecting that another life form has given me life. This is why I support organically produced foods that will be processed through ethical farming methods within the general framework of the Standard American…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first premise is certainly false. “If we (everyone) minded her own business, and tended to their own needs, then everyone would be better off.” This premise, as it is, cannot hold up the self-reliance argument let alone ethical egoism. If John, an elderly man, was walking in the park and had a fall, would he be better off if Jill, a bystander, just continued on her way? She was running late to work and could easily tend to her own needs leaving John on the ground moaning in pain.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Ecology

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Social ecology observes humans as the main cause of the destroyed earth, by overpopulation. The earth is made up of numerous people with different races and religions. It is because of the destructive habits men and women have created which have led to a polluted earth (Carlson, Felton, 2001). Murray Bookchin is the main contributor to the social ecology movement. Bookchin (1995) preaches that he feels human beings are aliens which have no place in a natural evolution and sees them as somewhat of an…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay On Anthropocentrism

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anthropocentrism is the belief that only human beings hold direct moral standing. Under this belief, no other things, living or nonliving, are of moral concern. Many people may then jump to the conclusion that anthropocentrists do not think that global warming is wrong. Because global warming can have negative impacts on human beings, anthropocentrists would be concerned about it. There are some human activities, however, that would increase global warming but would still be ethical to perform in the eyes of an anthropocentrist. An anthropocentrist who believes that global warming is real and is a result of human activity would say that there is an optimal balance in the human-nature relationship which holds the highest ethical implications.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays