Preview

Why Are Gun Safety Laws Important

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Are Gun Safety Laws Important
Gun safety law are what protect our children, family, friends, and pets. Should we accept more gun safety laws? We already live in a world where gun safety laws are pretty strict. The increasing of safety laws would deprive citizens of protecting themselves. Everyone legally has a right to have a gun. To have even more laws would restrict them to their rights which is outrageous. Gun safety rules are already strict enough and we do not need any extra pressure. Gun safety laws have protected people for many years without any changes. Gun safety laws don’t need to be increased but enforced. After the death of President John Kennedy, Attorney General Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr., gun safety laws were put into action. The law that was put in place was called the Gun Control Act which has been around since 1968. This act has gone above and beyond with protecting citizens. The Gun Control Act set boundaries and regulations for citizens. The act also made the selling of unregistered guns or transferring unregistered guns illegally. This law is one of the many created to protect the citizens of America. The restriction of guns allowed for safer communities and calmer environments. …show more content…

This could lead to the establishment of safer states and better communities. Also, lower the chances of accidental gun deaths. However, if more laws were in place that would restrict people of their constitutional right. The second amendment states that a person cannot be refrained from their to bear arms. If that right is provoked, it gives the government more power over the people. The government should not have the right to restrict a person from obtaining a gun. If they could ban the second amendment then they could ban our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Banning a complete class of guns is unconstitutional (District of Columbia v. Heller). Perhaps people should ask why there are mass shootings since they appear to have only occurred after WW II. That is about the time politicians began restricting gun ownership and use. No matter where you stand on the issue, the controversy will be over how much control the state or nation may have over what is determined to be a Constitutional right. As I continue to contemplate the matter, I continue to question whether or not the Second Amendment causes more harm than good.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This leads me to believe that there would be less violence with stricter gun laws . These laws would include extensive background checks on the people who buy the guns, longer waiting periods, and mental health evaluations to ensure guns stay out of the wrong hands. Proponents of stricter guns laws believe mass shootings and other violent crimes would decrease with stricter gun control but opponents believe making guns harder to get will take away our second amendment right to bear arms and that if everyone had a gun they would be able to protect themselves and that in itself would reduce…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (2) Federal law already prohibits certain people from owning firearms: those with certain kinds of criminal records or mental illness; drug addicts; immigrants without legal status; veterans who left the military with a dishonorable discharge; and anyone with a permanent restraining order keeping them from a partner or a partner’s children. So with this already in action, do we really need more gun control? Now we are discussing needing a background check on every person and taking away a big portion of guns, but clearly, we won’t be needing…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main idea of stricter gun control is to deter crime rates, but doing this could potentially increase crime rates instead. Not allowing law abiding citizens to own guns will leave them defenseless to criminals that still have access to illegal guns. If criminals know that citizens no longer have guns to protect themselves, they are more likely to attempt that crime on them thus increasing crime rates. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), “Global Study on Homicide,”…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens have been bearing arms since the beginning of time, but in today’s time it is becoming more of a problem. Having the proper gun control would play a major part in decreasing the crime and murder rate in the US. The second amendment states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Brady Handgun Prevention Acts, enacted November 30, 1993, made it unavoidable for anyone seeking to purchase a firearm without first passing a background check headed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The acts also made it illegal to conceal a handgun without proper licensing as well as put restrictions on who can buy certain firearms. A continuation of the acts also made it so that an individual must be 21 years of age to own a handgun legally and 18 years old to own a rifle or shotgun. The F.B.I. also keeps records of all gun purchases made in the U.S. and retains all information about the individuals who purchase them. The most critical act created in regards to gun control was the Federal Assault Weapons Ban passed on September 13, 1994. This act made it illegal for civilians to own military grade weapons in the U.S. which is critical in order to ensure that these firearms do not find their way into the hands of those seeking to cause havoc. There are a number of specifications that weapons must meet in order to classify it as too lethal for public ownership or not. The weapon must first meet a specific magazine size and bullet caliber. Statistically, the AR-15 is the most popular assault rifle available to citizens of the U.S. numbering in at four million owners. This rifle fires a .223 caliber round and is now sold to the general public with a magazine that does not exceed fifteen rounds. A caliber of this magnitude is acceptable in America because it is said to have a lesser chance to create mass casualties in a shootout. Smaller ammunition cartridges has proven effective for this as well. The action made to lower magazine cartridge sizes was an effective law passed by congress. Less ammunition limits the ability for mass shootings and in a sense it also helps decrease the chances of…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The limitation of gun usage would restrict Americans of their second amendment rights. Firearms are known for being widespread and favored throughout the southern portion of America, if certain laws were put into place, southern states would rebel. Havoc and chaos would break free throughout the United States, possibly costing America more in the end. If restrictions were assembled, Americans would be forced to carry or smuggle weapons illegally, causing more unlawful activity. Historically, America’s founding fathers felt it was necessary to have the right to bear arms, if the government…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Second Amendment stops the federal government from entirely banning guns in America, limited restrictions are permitted on the possession and distribution of firearms. The ease of obtaining a firearm in America fosters a dangerous environment and crime. Hence, the Second Amendment should be reinterpreted so that sterner gun laws can be implemented because current background checks are flawed, gun accessibility has been abused by foreign and domestic criminals, and some people cannot handle guns responsibly.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Second Amendment states, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (US Const., amend. 2). The amendment was adopted for a number of reasons, ranging from wanting to give U.S. residents the right to protect themselves in case the government waged war against the people, and the right to provide for their families by hunting with firearms, to ensuring their right to defend their homes against invaders. Basically, the second amendment was mainly put in place for our protection. The 2008 Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, upheld that right (No. 7-290. Supreme Ct. of the US. 26 June 2008). The Court 's ruling led to the lifting of a ban on handguns that had existed for 32 years. In an interview with the Washington Post, Lawyer Alan Gura noted that there had been "all sorts of predictions that there would be blood on the streets and carnage and all…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Gun Control Arguments

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since 1982, there have been at least 85 public mass shootings across the country, with the killings unfolding in 34 states from Massachusetts to Hawaii. Due to these mass shootings, the left side/liberals believe that the United States’ government needs to act and create and enforce gun control laws. Some people view all guns, no matter the purpose, as malicious and there is too easy of access to own a gun. The second amendment is in existence because our Founding Father’s saw how important it is for a free country to be able to stand up for themselves against tyranny. Those who are pro-gun control do not understand the valuable means behind the foundation of the United States of America. For 200 years, the second amendment has helped…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control interpret it as being meant for the militia and that the gun laws should be stricter for the average American citizen or ban guns altogether. However, opponents of more gun control believe that the amendment is protecting an individual’s rights right to own guns and protect themselves. However, gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime. Guns will still exist even if it’s not legal for civilians to own them because there is always a way for criminals to get a hold of them, it has been proven in history, and don’t prevent gun related deaths.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control laws give too much power to the government and may result in government tyranny and the government taking away all guns from citizens. Many people consider that gun control laws can give too much power to the government over the people. That is why our Founding Fathers wrote the Second Amendment. They had lived under the tyranny of King George and they wanted to make sure that free people in this new country would never be subjugated again and have to live under…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson one of our founding fathers once said that “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms only disarm those who are neither inclined or determined to commit crimes”. Gun control laws have been around since the 1800’s ,with the fist law coming into play in 1870.That first law about firearms stated that you would need a license if you wished to carry your firearms outside of your own home and property. Then in the 1900’s a law passed to help insure the safety of other. That law passed in 1903 and it stated that firearms could not be sold to the drunken or the mentally insane and unstable. Evidence has proven that more gun control laws would not be beneficial to the public and would not help reduce the amount of violent crimes being committed with guns.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For about a century America has had gun regulation, starting in 1934 when Franklin D. Roosevelt imposed a tax on machine guns and sawed off shotguns. The gun regulation has now progressed to a system that completes a background check and denies the person a gun if there is any criminal history. Laws are being promoted by congress to make it exponentially harder to obtain a gun for the safety of the public.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays