One of the main reasons memorials are made are to let the public be aware of the person or thing that is being memorialized and help them remember. If the memorial gives off a weird vibe and doesn’t fully portray the remembrance that is requested, then it has failed. The public’s eye can be hard to catch, but once it is caught, it will immensely memorialize what is expected. “The public monument speaks to a deep need for attachment that can be met only in a real place, where the imagined community actually materializes and the existence of the nation is confirmed in a simple but powerful way.” (Savage) If the memorial doesn’t capture what is being memorialized to its full extent, it is disrespecting what is being …show more content…
By this, I don’t mean the “easiness” or “laziness” aspect. For example, in Source F, Roadside America expands on a story about a man who lazily puts together a monument. “The sculpture was supposed to be cast in bronze and made part of the Maine exhibit at the 1939 New York World’s Fair. But Maine ran out of money, so the artist just slapped a coat of bronze paint over the plaster model and shipped it to New York” That statue ended up being taken to a warehouse where it was eaten by rats. It is clear that when lazy work is put into a monument, it will end up being trash. Thus, these actions are completely disrespectful to the person or thing that is being memorialized. The lack of time and effort reflects badly on everyone involved in the construction of the