Preview

Why Are People Against Net Neutrality

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1182 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Are People Against Net Neutrality
Experts believe that Tom Wheeler, the chairman of the FCC, will be proposing some new regulations for the FCC that will take place for the Internet. Why is the FCC creating these regulations for the Internet? In essence, they want to set these regulations in place to make the Internet a more regulated and controlled utility. This is ultimately a move that helps to ensure net neutrality stays locked down.

What is Net Neutrality?

Net neutrality is the principle that all governments and Internet service providers should treat all data on the Internet as equal. They should not be allowed to discriminate based on content, application, platform or the type of communication that is being used. In 2003, Tim Wu, a media law professor, coined this
…show more content…
They talk about how net neutrality has stifled the open market, and it interferes with the funding for bigger projects that could help to boost the high speed Internet infrastructure that other countries have enjoyed. On a global scale, the United State ranked as number 10 for the Internet economy. That means that they do have some areas for improvement.

Prioritizing the Internet

People who have argued for prioritizing the Internet or talking against net neutrality have argued that this does not ensure that top priority services, such as healthcare have a higher priority over sharing bandwidth pool with the public. While that is a great argument against it, the problem is that it can also be badly misused, and there is little promise that it would not be used for that. For example, it has recently been proven that Comcast throttled the bandwidth so that it steered people towards their video services, such as Netflix. It's nice to think that it would all be used for the good of the Internet, but most likely, it would be used to profit the bigger

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We’ve spent a lot of time here at TLF talking about the sound economic arguments against net neutrality regulation. We argue that net neutrality regulation will result in worse consequences than leaving the internet relatively unregulated. But to me, the more important point is that net neutrality regulation is itself unjust.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jrlc Chapter 2 Pt. 1

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe that eventually some form of net neutrality will have to be put in place to prevent censorship or any restrictions of content based on person-to-person or amount of money being paid for service.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Lin Ray, net neutrality means no bit of information should be prioritized over another (“VCU Blog”, 2014). The origin of information doesn’t matter. Due to net neutrality, there are no restrictions on the internet currently. In other words, we can have free communication. The entire source of the internet is freely available for normal web users. Losing the freedom of internet access could result in restricted access to websites; fewer download rights and so on. The topic of net neutrality has become controversial because several companies are trying to take away the freedom of internet access.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blown To Bits Analysis

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The FCC regulates the media sources of the United States of America. The regulate the radios and television of america. They ensure that there is not any malicious content being broadcasted to the American public. The FCC wished to censor the internet after they successfully censored television and radio. I think this is ridiculous the purpose of the internet is to be able to communicate and transfer information of any sort or any kind between people. This regulation would destroy the purpose of the internet. It is up to the user to decide whether or not something is malicious content not the…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Net neutrality is the idea that all content on the internet should be treated equally (Schewick, 2009). This means that ISP’s cannot discriminate against content by slowing down content they do not agree with or charging internet companies more to have certain content delivered faster (Schewick, 2009). Net neutrality has been the unspoken standard since the creation of the internet. This is because, when the internet was first created, ISP’s did not have the technology to determine which content was going through their network (Schewick, 2009). Since then, technology has improved and ISP’s now have the ability to determine which content is going through their network and effect its delivery to the end user (Schewick, 2009).…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Net neutrality is vital if we care about preserving our rights in this ever-changing online culture. Jana Kasperkevic, in her essay “Net Neutrality: Explained,” gives a good analogy: “No net neutrality is like a taxicab refusing to take one customer but taking…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killswitch Documentary

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Internet has become a popular source of mainstream media. A battle is raging over the control of the Internet, and the rights of the American people are at stake. The documentary Killswitch, exposes the true power of the Internet and how the government is controlling that power; violating freedom of speech and the right to privacy. The documentary takes a stand in favor of Net Neutrality, which is the principle that the Internet enables access to all-content without choosing or blocking certain websites. The efforts of Aaron Swartz and Edward Snowden to win back Internet freedom are highlighted in this documentary in order to appeal to American citizens to take action in favor of Net Neutrality. “Freedom is embedded in technology and we have to protect technology if we want to protect our freedom” (Killswitch). Internet regulation grants power to the Government and violates constitutional rights of Americans hindering the Nation’s founding principle of democracy.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Kriens, S. (2006, November 29). Net Neutrality. Speech presented at Stanford Technology Venture Program, Stanford. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1638…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Net Neutrality Rules

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For this situation, the Internet Service Providers have demonstrated that the business sector will just hurt consumers if there is no administration intercession. By permitting any Internet Service Provider to level the web, consumers will be compelled to pay numerous times for the same services and access it has had since the beginning of the World Wide Web. On top of that, tiering could bring about the Internet Service Provider turning into a gate keeper of the Internet. This could have extreme influence what stays and goes on the web. Enforcing data caps and throttling data speeds can make the most popular services and websites slow to deliver content or just be unusable to begin with. It also will limit the usage and the time spend on the…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Net Neutrality is a topic of debate and confusion in the United States. It draws supporters as diverse as the Christian Coalition and moveon.org, pits traditional telecommunications companies like Verizon and Comcast against Internet giants such as Yahoo! and Google, and gives politicians yet another platform to raise an ongoing liberal-conservative debate over government regulation. So what is all this talk about? Philosophically, Net Neutrality is an ethical framework to govern access to the Internet. It advocates no restrictions on content, sites, or platforms, on the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and on the modes of communication allowed. In 2005, the FCC embedded these principles into its policy with an objective to “encourage broadband deployment and preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of the public Internet” (Policy Statement). This statement and proposed additional legislation is the source of continued controversy today. Fundamentally, the debate is grounded in opinions of necessity of Internet regulations and the repercussions of action or inaction. This paper will attempt to provide a context for the debate, a better understanding of the regulation and the possible implications, and a summary of the differing views.…

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    But, what the FCC isn’t taking into account is the millions of internet users that want to keep internet neutrality. With net neutrality maintained, users of the internet will have equal access to the internet, which will increase their total…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    US Government Watching Us

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Internet governance will make it harder for tech countries to monitor our every move. Also as the people we should demand assistance from governments and corporations. We have to prevent total totalitarian government, avoid mistakes of the ITU, and legitimize bad government behavior. It will make it easier on our future generation to up hold what we are starting and taking back and hopefully we can develop new ways to keep this NSA bug away.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Telecommunications Act of 1996 can be termed as a major overhaul of the communications law in the past sixty-two years. The main aim of this Act is to enable any communications firm to enter the market and compete against one another based on fair and just practices ("The Telecommunications Act 1996," The Federal Communications Commission). This Act has the potential to radically change the lives of the people in a number of different ways. For instance it has affected the telephone services both local and long distance, cable programming and other video services, broadcast services and services provided to schools. The Federal Communications Commission has actively endorsed this Act and has worked towards the enforcement and implementation of the various clauses listed in the document. The Act was basically brought into existence in order to promote competition and reduce regulation so that lower prices and higher quality services for the Americans consumers may be secured.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The internet is being regulated more and more by governments, but is it a good thing?…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Certain individuals believe that lifting net neutrality would open a free market. In addition, these supporters claim that there are very few violations of net neutrality. The assumption is that the ISPs will abide by a code of honor and not block rivals websites. The people against net neutrality believe that lifting it would lead to a free market, few violations, and will not limit the open…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays