Why Are The Key Relationships In Hamlet's Soliloquies
Hamlet and key relationships
In Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet, the Shakespearian hero is undoubtedly the most compelling character. He is dynamic, complex and, through his soliloquies, we are provided with most of the thematic content in Hamlet. However, it is not just Hamlet’s soliloquies that develop his character and establish the thematic content; the secondary characters that surround him, and, more his relationships and interactions with them provide us with just as much to digest as Hamlet’s private meditations. Hamlet and Laertes mirror each other in many important ways, creating a complex thematic scene and establishing a parallel story with interesting implications; Hamlet’s choices concerning his mother, as well as the dialogue that the two of them engage in, constitute a veritable hero-test, demonstrating the strength of Hamlet’s virtue; Hamlet’s actions and words with respect to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern represent a significant arc for Hamlet, and his eventual plotting to kill them speaks volumes about a crucial part of his character. We also perceive brave Hamlet’s relentless search for reality uncovering and unveiling the countless number of questions trapped inside him. This shows the struggle displays the …show more content…
Instead of punishing Hamlet for Polonius’ murder himself, Claudius sent the prince to England alongside Rosencrantz and Guildenstern with letters that would arrange Hamlet’s death, making it look like an accident. You are lead to believe he is having someone else do the dirty work to save the Queen’s feelings, but I think it had just as much to do with politics. Hamlet was well liked by the people, for reasons we are not aware of, and his punishment could lead the people to rally around him and rise up against the King. Claudius’ plans fall apart when Hamlet alters the letters himself, having Rosencrantz and Guildenstern executed in his
In Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet, the Shakespearian hero is undoubtedly the most compelling character. He is dynamic, complex and, through his soliloquies, we are provided with most of the thematic content in Hamlet. However, it is not just Hamlet’s soliloquies that develop his character and establish the thematic content; the secondary characters that surround him, and, more his relationships and interactions with them provide us with just as much to digest as Hamlet’s private meditations. Hamlet and Laertes mirror each other in many important ways, creating a complex thematic scene and establishing a parallel story with interesting implications; Hamlet’s choices concerning his mother, as well as the dialogue that the two of them engage in, constitute a veritable hero-test, demonstrating the strength of Hamlet’s virtue; Hamlet’s actions and words with respect to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern represent a significant arc for Hamlet, and his eventual plotting to kill them speaks volumes about a crucial part of his character. We also perceive brave Hamlet’s relentless search for reality uncovering and unveiling the countless number of questions trapped inside him. This shows the struggle displays the …show more content…
Instead of punishing Hamlet for Polonius’ murder himself, Claudius sent the prince to England alongside Rosencrantz and Guildenstern with letters that would arrange Hamlet’s death, making it look like an accident. You are lead to believe he is having someone else do the dirty work to save the Queen’s feelings, but I think it had just as much to do with politics. Hamlet was well liked by the people, for reasons we are not aware of, and his punishment could lead the people to rally around him and rise up against the King. Claudius’ plans fall apart when Hamlet alters the letters himself, having Rosencrantz and Guildenstern executed in his