Preview

Why Did Adnan Syed Killed Hae Min Lee?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1004 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Adnan Syed Killed Hae Min Lee?
For the past couple of weeks we have been listening to podcast called serial, It is all to figure out whether or not Adnan Syed killed Hae min lee. In this essay I will tell you my thoughts and beliefs on this subject. To start this off I know that this could tick some people off but I believe that Adnan did it. “Why, He would never do something like this” Some people will say, and my answer just like many in the podcast serial have said. All of the evidence points directly at Adnan. I honestly believe that they had just enough evidence to convict him of this murder. Let's start from the beginning. Adnan and Hae have history, They were very in love at one point in each others lives and would do anything for each other. Until it all ended, (mostly because of Adnan’s family). After this nobody knew how either of them felt about each other. Some believe that this break-up completely wrecked Adnan. He was angry, sad, and had no idea what to do without Hae. But …show more content…
His attorney did not do her job in the best way. Cristina Gutierrez Adnan’s attorney took another route in trying to keep Adnan out of jail. She tried her best to make it look like somebody else committed the crime. Not that Adnan was innocent just that someone else had done this horrible thing. To me that just seems like trying to pass the blame onto someone else. A lawyer is supposed to do their job no matter guilty or innocent. So if Adnan is guilty then he probably told cristina if he was guilty and this was her only way to fight for Adnan. The thing that surprises me the most was that Adnan never gave his own statement. He never tried to defend himself in any way. Yes I know that this ending statement doesn’t help much in the long run but he didn’t try to convince the jury at all he was just done with it. Some of the jury got on the podcast and said that this changed their minds about Adnan’s case, the fact that he wouldn’t get up and defend

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Serial, is a Podcast produced by an investigative journalist and a former reporter for the Baltimore Sun named Sarah Koenig. Serial is a spinoff produced by the WBEZ 91.5 Chicago radio station and This American life. This specific podcast addresses the 1999 case of Adnan Syed vs The State of Maryland. In this case, Adnan is being accused for the murder of his former girlfriend Hae Min Lee. More than fifteen years later, this case once again sparked controversy when aired in 2014 through the podcast. In Serial, reporter Sarah Koenig intended to seek justice for Adnan by portraying him as innocent, which listeners can tell through the three rhetorical appeals; ethos, pathos and logos which she presents throughout the case along with interviews, evidence and personal statements.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The case of Adnan Syed is a mysterious one, it all starts with the murder of a 17 year old girl from Baltimore County, Maryland; Hae Min Lee. On the afternoon of January 13, 1999 she disappeared, her body was later found in Leakin Park (a hotspot for dead bodies) cause of death: strangulation. Her ex-boyfriend ,Adnan Syed, was arrested later for the crime and in June 6, 2000 was sentenced to life plus 30 years in prison. The case on his story was mainly based from testimony given from his friend, Jay, who testified to helping Adnan bury Hae’s body. Adnan constantly insists that he had nothing to do with her death. Is Adnan Syed really guilty?…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every day there are cases with little to no evidence and people going to jail despite the lack of evidence. That very thing happened to Adnan Masud Syed; On February 25, 2000, he was found guilty of the first-degree murder of Hae Min Lee. In January of 1999 Hae’s body was found manhandling strangled in a shallow grave in (name of park) one month after she went missing. Jay Wilds, Syed’s best friend, says he helped Syed dump her dead body but was not there for the murder. What happened to innocent until proven guilty? It is hard to convict someone of murder with no physical evidence.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adnan Syed's Case Study

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On February 25, 2000 Adnan Syed’s world came crumbling down around him. Adnan was convicted to life plus thirty years for the murder of his high school ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee. Although Adnan was convicted, he is not guilty. The prosecution's case was shaky and was built around one witnesses constantly changing testimony. The witness was Jay Wilds, the neighbourhood drug dealer and a former schoolmate of Adnan’s. As well as the prosecution's main witness being unreliable, the cell phone tower data that they used to convict Adnan says on the cover sheet that the cell phone data from incoming calls can't be used to reliably and precisely locate a cell phone. Lastly, the autopsy report of Hae Min Lee showed fixed frontal lividity, the phenomenon…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adnan Syed Case

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages

    First, Adnan Syed is innocent because he was talking to Asia McClain in the library at 2:30 p.m. One very crucial detail to this is that the murder was at 2:36 p.m.. Asia McClain told Sarah Koenig that she was talking to Adnan on the day of the murder.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hae Min Lee Case Analysis

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The murder case of Hae Min Lee is full of unanswered questions. Adnan Syed, 17 at the time of the murder is now a 36-year-old man who had the potential to make a difference in our world. However, his peers betrayed him and he was falsely convicted of the murder of his ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee, which led to several trials. There have been unproven testimonies and possible alibies, but none that add up to a clear and concise answer. Although there is evidence from both sides proclaiming Adnan’s guilt and innocence; from what I have gathered, this case can only lead to his innocence. Personally, I believe Adnan is innocent because there’s not enough substantial evidence to prove that he is guilty.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adnan's Guilty Case Study

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On January 13, 1999, a senior from Woodlawn High School in Baltimore County, Maryland named Hae Min Lee was murdered. On February 9, 1999, her body was found. A few weeks after, ex-boyfriend Adnan Syed was convicted and charged of first-degree murder. Many question Adnan’s guilt and whether he received a fair trial or not.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On January 13th, 1999 in Woodlawn, Maryland, the life of Hae Min Lee has been taken, but by who seems to be the question. Hae was loved by many, she was beautiful, intelligent and outgoing, so who would want to kill her? Like many cases, the attention turned to her ex-boyfriend, Adnan Syed. Much attention has been brought to the case of The State v. Adnan Syed. From that attention came the Podcasts Serial and then Undisclosed. While the podcasts are told by different people and have different concepts, they both bring attention to wanting to know the truth. On of the pieces of the case is the Testimony told by Jay Wild’s, an acquaintance of Adnan, which has many inconsistencies and lacks credibility.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adnan is in jail and knowing that he may or may not have done it, but Jay changed his story over and over, and Adnan said the same story and didn't change anything and when he thought of something he told them what he remembered. When someone asked Jay if he said something that he said before he would say that he didn't say that, which he did he changed his story to make him look innocent when he probably isn't. Jay should of got sometime in jail instead of no time because they didn't even think of when he helped Adnan dig the hole they didn't ask Adnan if he helped him or not they just went off of what Jay said and what Jay said probably isn't right.…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    JFK LONE GUNMAN

    • 1141 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is a well-known fact that President John F Kennedy was shot dead, assassinated in Dealey Plaza on the 22nd of November, 1963. What is still debated today however, is who killed Kennedy, and how many people were involved. One of the main contributing factors to this debate is the amount of potential forensic evidence destroyed, the question of how reliable some of the evidence is (, mainly eye-witness accounts), and the evidence that is yet to be released to the public (, why is it locked up, what light can it shed on the event?). Due to many problems surrounding the very evidence that historians, politicians and common people alike draw their opinions from, there can be no definitive conclusion as to whether JFK was killed by a lone gunman, or even who is ultimately responsible for his death. The evidence recovered on the assassination of JFK largely supports the theory of a lone gunman, the identity of this gunman however, is still hotly debated, but a significant portion of all evidence released to the public points to the lone gunman theory. The way this evidence supports the lone gunman theory is varied. Several eye witnesses claim…

    • 1141 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    These rumors only make my feelings toward Adnan being innocent more prominent. I do not believe that Adnan was a psychopath. However, anybody can snap and go off under the right circumstances. Adnan being the “golden…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There was no way Sacco and Vanzetti could have been proved guilty. People like Sacco and Vanzetti who were radicals or immigrants were called bad people and people could not trust them. People needed Jobs, but people did not want foreigners to take their jobs and also did not want them in their neighborhoods if they could not speak english. The hatred of foreigners grew as time went on. Because of all this, juror’s opinions of Sacco and Vanzetti were changed at the start of the trial. To them, it meant that they were both not good people and were probably guilty. Some witnesses were obviously lying because of propaganda and the information they read from newspapers and their information should not have been listened…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On November 22nd, 1963, President John F. Kennedy (JFK) was shot and killed in a motorcade running through Dealy Plaza, in Dallas, Texas. Shortly after, a man by the name of Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested and charged with the murder of President Kennedy. Over the years there has been much controversy over if Lee Harvey Oswald was in fact, the only man involved in the assassination of JFK. The assassination is still a topic of debate to this day and has spawned many conspiracy theories. At the time, there was little persuasive evidence to prove that Oswald was involved in any sort of conspiracy to assassinate the president, but as time went on people began to grow suspicious of certain things. In 1966, Mark Lane was one of the first to introduce the idea that Oswald did not act alone with the publication of his book Rush to Judgment. Now today, 75% of people believe Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone[1], 70% of respondents believed that the assassination involved more than one person[2]. Also 66% of Americans believe that there was a conspiracy, while 74% believed that there was a cover up[3]. It is inevitable that there is much confusion as to who was involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but I firmly believe that there is indisputable evidence that shows that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone in the assassination.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han's Crimes Essay

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although the jury finds Han not guilty of pre-meditated murder, the details of the story show his crime to be in fact pre-meditated murder. All evidence shows that, he has a deceptive and manipulative character. He has the opportunity to commit murder without blame, and because he has a reason. Upon hearing the interview of character witnesses and analyzing Hans 's thoughts and feelings during the course of the murder, the reader finds sufficient evidence of the several reasons Han intentionally killed his wife during the course of the act. There are three major reasons as to why Han is guilty. The first being a mistake like this cannot happen to an experienced performer, secondly Han 's manipulative character, and lastly Han 's motives for killing his wife.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think Sonia is the person who is guilty in this story. Sonia's personality is shy and doesn't talk a lot, she probably hoped by acting like this she wouldn't have been caught. She seems like an intelligent and discreet person and would easily compose a plan for this crime. Sonia is the best programmer at Logi-Clique and that makes her a role model. It could be another reason for her not to be caught because who would think of her committing the crime? Also, the inspector found a note in her office. This shows that Sonia is hiding something and doesn't want to tell anybody. Sonia seems like a good person, but her work gets copyrighted by Fernand without any credit, and a note found in her office, it could possibly be Sonia who committed the…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays