Preview

Why Did Conflict Occur In The 19th And Early 20th Century

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
172 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Conflict Occur In The 19th And Early 20th Century
The occurrences of massacres throughout the 19th and early 20th century highlight the reasons in which conflict could and did occur. The motives vary and are abstract, past the simplistically of social darwinism being the main cause. It was not well determined in the 18 century, unlike now that imbedded in there culture was little or no concept of ownership or property, because of this the aboriginals unknowingly where considered hostile when trespassing on to settlers land as they believed the land belonged to all people, in the same sense the the aboriginals also considered the settlers hostile as they were using their land without permission. Unsurprisingly this led to increased tensions between groups. These tensions fused greatly, as means

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the 1600’s English settlers came to America seeking refuge, and land. Upon coming to America the settlers crossed paths with the natives and eventually lead to a variety of relationships. There were various factors that shaped the relations in certain regions such as the Chesapeake Bay and New England. The events that lead up to tension between the natives were the settler’s lust for new land, diseases and the on-going disputes between the natives and the settlers.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decade of Crisis 1850

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Wilmot Proviso was an amendment proposed, by democrat David Wilmot, to the bill for peace with Mexico in 1846. The amendment stated that all land attained in the treaty with Mexico would be slave free. This proposed amendment would be a debated for years and set out a pressing issue dealing with westward expansion. Southerners thought it was unfair because, “all Americans should have equal rights, including the right to move their property.” Polk tried to compromise by suggesting that we expand the Missouri Compromise line to the Pacific Ocean, with the same rules no slavery in the north of the line and slavery would be allowed south of the line. Another idea that came into play, because of this issue was, “popular sovereignty,” each territory had the right to choose for themselves and with their own representative whether or not they would be free or slave territories. In the election of 1848 both parties tried to avoid this issue as much as possible and a new party formed. They new party opposed slavery as the Free-Soil Party, their candidate was Martin Van Buren. The Free-Soil Party supported the Wilmot Proviso. Although they did not win the election it was an important event in American politics and it showed the lack of capability the current parties had to please the people on the issues. This led to the fall of the second party system.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Myall Creek Mascarre

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2) The people involved in the massacre had been exposed to Aboriginal murders in many circumstances so were hardened in their own feelings and thoughts regarding Aboriginal people.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This action makes the indigenous complicit in the eyes of the government. The motive of the killing was to take over subversives. The military rationale for killing was that the people who were killed, were killed because they subversives, not because they were indigenous. The military explained subversion as a virus, that infected children, men, and women. Subversives needed to be annihilated and were referred to as “beasts and demons.”…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    One form of violence was between the Europeans and the Indians. It is well documented that the Spanish butchered, beat, and killed countless Indians in order to secure territory. In general, all of the various European nationalities used their advantages in war tactics to force the Indians off of their own lands and onto lands that they were unfamiliar with. This in turn caused the Indians a great amount of hardship, because they now did not know the best places to hunt, or to gather berries, or to garden, or where to build their homesteads. By using violence to force the Indians to move away from their familiar homelands, the Europeans also caused a breakdown of the reciprocal tribal relationships.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Approximately 27-30 aboriginals were killed here and were left until found by a passer-by. The sources indicate this is a result of the aboriginals frightening and killing the cattle.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Aboriginals customs and life style were being broken down as the natural resources that the natives relied on were being diminished by the Europeans. Cutting down of trees, fishing holes being taken over and the hunt for Kangaroos for meat were all needed by the natives to survive. Without these resources the many Aboriginals took up Governor Phillips offer and moved into town with the whites, sleeping and eating in the settlers’ houses.(3)…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The reoccurring violence in Cairo Il caused a huge decline in the population over time. Riots, mobs, and lynchings were happening everywhere you turned. The main reason that lynchings were happening were from rapes. Another major event and events that happened that caused a huge decline in the population was all of the mob activities. What would cause such events like these to occur?…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He exposes past historians for ignoring violence, such as one who claimed ‘Australia was the only country which had been acquired by peaceful occupation’. Reynolds argues that this ignorance prevents Australians from coming to terms with their past, and his criticism is conveyed by his metaphoric classification of the omission as the ‘Great Australian Silence’. He holds that colonisation involved constant violent conflict between settlers and indigenous tribes. To support his view, Reynolds highlights the openness with which violence was admitted and discussed in the colonial era. In Chapter 9 he includes the account of a settler who wrote, ‘our best shots are after them…there will be weeping and wailing shortly’. The writer’s callous attitude to brutality reflects the ubiquitous presence of violence Reynolds wishes to portray. Consequently, he concludes in Chapter 14 that the conflict was part of an invasion process intended to ‘terrorise the indigenous peoples into acquiescence’. Reynolds links this past mistreatment of indigenous Australians to the present day social injustice they face, recalling one lawyer’s statement that ‘he could not bring himself to believe that killing a black man was as serious a matter as killing a white one’. The confession illustrates the way…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Road To Revolution

    • 1241 Words
    • 12 Pages

    ROAD TO REVOLUTION CHART AND RANKING SYSTEM Danyelle Harris Raevin Frank Jeremy Deng British Action Navigation Law 1650s - Tried to enforce strict trade codes. RATIONALE Colonial Reaction The colonists were there Smuggling to make money for the “mother” country. (Britain) RATIONALE They wanted to make themselves more money$$ Was created to reduce Continue to smuggle They felt as though their smuggling of goods in anyways and violating rights were being taken the colonies by searching the writ.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What instigated trouble were the Europeans encroachment on Indian territories and getting involved with the natives ‘ wars in order to gain security and increase their land ownership . Through cunning and manipulation , the…

    • 1484 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aboriginal Frontier Wars

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The nature of frontier war is fighting that was on the border of the furthest extent of inhabited areas. Fighting had begun between the Aboriginals and the Europeans when the natives found out that the foreigners were here to stay and expand on land. Pioneers and pastoralist were at the forefront of the frontier pushing Aboriginals back making them crack and wanting to fight back. Both sides felt like they were fighting for survival. If only the Europeans did not expand and take there would have never been any frontier war.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aboriginals Essay

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aboriginal people had been exploited, treated unfairly and oppressed by people in their own nation, this took place during world war 2 and continued for many more year's. Aborigines struggled to gain there right's and to be treated as an equal, just like white Australian's. White Australian's believed they had greater natural abilities and higher standard of civilisation. There has been policies of Protection, Assimilation, Integration and Self-determination.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Oka Crisis

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Land ownership is arguably one of the most controversial aspects of Aboriginal human rights today in Canada. The issue of land ownership reached a tense climax in the summer of 1990, when a violent standoff erupted over ownership rights to a piece of land within the town of Oka. The 78-day standoff between the Quebec Police and the Mohawks of Kanesatake was one of the most revolutionary acts of defiance of Canadian Aboriginals in the 20th century.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the start of the seventeenth century, Native Americans greeted European settlers with much excitement. They regarded settlers as strange, but were interested to learn about the new tools and weapons Europeans brought with them. The native people were more than accommodating to the settlers, but as time passed, Europeans took advantage of their generosity. “Once these newcomers disembarked and began to feel their way across the continent, they forever altered the course and pace of native development.” Native Americans and Europeans faced many conflicts due to their vast differences in language, religion and culture. European settlers’ inability to understand and respect Native Americans lead to many struggles that would eventually erupt into violent warfare.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays