Preview

Why Did Harper's Early Election Lose?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1639 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Harper's Early Election Lose?
Early election calls are made in complete confidence and in complete vigilance of the current Prime Minister’s reputation among his people. When Prime Minister Harper called an early election in 2015 it was because he believed the Conservatives could win. Through the use of new legislation and strict, strategic planning, Harper organized a situation in which it seemed unlikely the Conservative’s would lose. This paper will answer how Prime Minister Harper took into account the constraints included within the Parliamentary and First-Past-The-Post electoral system, and how he used them both for and against the Conservative Party in his electoral campaign. The essay also definitively answers how the 2015 federal election would have differed in …show more content…
This system “is known for the separation of powers and for congressional committee system” (Dickerson & Flanagan, 1982). In relation to Prime Minister Harper’s plan for re-election, the election would be significantly different in a Presidential system. To start, the passing of the Fair Elections Act most likely would not have occurred due to the loose party discipline as well as the separation of powers leading to the opportunity of vetoing the bill – Explained further, “the president’s powers are restricted by not being a member of Congress… limited to exercising influence rather than authority over its members” (Dickerson & Flanagan, 1982). As a result, Harper would not have acquired an increased campaign budget or an extended campaign time which would have negatively affected his party’s chances of winning. If met with an issue that the majority of people disagreed on, great opposition of the President could cause a “full-blown regime crisis” (Linz, p. 65, 1990). Also, the centralized power of a President would allow Harper to wield greater influence however it would not allow him to win a plurality. Yet, “the elected president wields substantial powers over the executive branch and the lawmaking process.” (Carey, p. 92, 2008). Additionally, if one takes into account the structural constraints in Canada’s electoral system, the distribution of population would be affected similar to that of the Presidential system. Through the use of electoral college votes, Harper would have to win districts by obtaining the highest number of electoral college votes. Essentially, considering that some of the ridings the Conservatives won in the 2011 campaign were relatively low population areas, the desired outcome would be improbable. The election in a Presidential system supports the notion that Prime Minister Harper’s party

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    When Canada’s founders were thinking of Canada’s legislature system they valued accountability.[4] Unicameralism is a single legislative house or chamber and their just isn’t the same accountability as the bicameralism legislatures.[5] They did not want one “high-handed Cabinet” because this could pose a threat and to the founders this was “classic forms of autocracy.”[6] This is why bicameralism was introduced to the legislature. They were concentrated on checks on balances in the form of The Cabinet, the Commons, and the Senate, which were like the three branches of government.[7] What is funny is that the word “democracy” was used differently back in those days and they used mixed or balanced.[8] The Founders were viewed as being Liberal democrats because of them picking the bicameralism legislature over the unicamerlism legislature.[9] Also the Father’s visions were never for a “fusion of powers” in the legislature, but that the…

    • 3508 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Trudeau’s essay to Francois Rocher’s The Quebec-Canada Dynamic or the Negation of the Ideal of Federalism, there are both similarities and differences in their construction. Rocher, states that the interpretation of the direction of the Canadian federalism greatly depends on the origin of scholar who writes it (312). Quebec scholars, argue that the system has forgotten its designed purpose and in turn aims to centralize power within federal authority (Rocher 312). While English speaking Canadians focused on: the links between federalism and democracy in respect to reducing tyrannical behaviour, the degree to which governments have created public policies to address citizen issues (Rocher 312). Additionally, Rocher, uses specific documents…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P. M Democratic Dictator

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1867 Canada’s government was established as a parliamentary democracy. It was declared that those in government are to follow the Bill of Rights and run Canada for the people. Recently, there has been much debate on whether or not the Prime Minister could be considered a “Democratic Dictator”. Democracy “is a foremost issue” and the people of Canada are arguing that one person may hold too much power. After exploring the possibilities, I do not believe the Prime Minister can be considered a Democratic Dictator, as he/she must be elected, have an opposition, and every law proposed is voted on in the House of Commons. However, in opposition to this statement, the P.M. holds…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autonomy In Canada Essay

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Canadian constitution states that Canada should have a “Constitution similar in principle to that of the United Kingdom” (Constitution act, 1867). Therefore, the Canadian Parliament is similar to the one of Britain. Both consist of the crown and two chambers. The lower house holds the same name in both countries: House of Commons. The upper house however is named the Senate in Canada and the House of Lords in Britain. As in the case of Britain, legislation in Canada must be assented by each of the Parliament’s constituents: the lower house, the upper house and the monarch respectively. Also in both countries the house of commons not only have to be elected but also elections are based on a first-past-the post system which means that the candidate receiving more votes than any other candidate is elected whether he has a majority or…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s not only about voting for the right leader but it’s about engagement. If there are issues that need to be assessed, just simply talk to your local representative about it (Mihevc, 2015). For every active citizen, their job is to build a better community for all individuals. Additionally, the government has the same job as well as reaching out to all citizens. Canadians just have to remember that the government is always there to help as long as citizens can invest their time into helping others. To conclude, Canada benefits from engaged citizens because there is so much that they can do by representing their voice and connecting with the government. It takes time to become interested in politics, but together as a country, citizens can get through any kind of political…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ontario Election

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ever since Dalton McGuinty was elected as the 24th premier of Ontario it was evident that many drastic changes were made. One of the main changes that McGuinty is well known for is his decision to introduce new taxes. Some of these unexpected taxes and costs that we must now face are eco taxes, health tax, the HST, and hydro bills. However, having a Tim Hudak government would help families when it comes to paying all of these, what seems to be, never-ending bills. In 2007, McGuinty even promised the people of Ontario that he would not hike taxes anymore by signing a contract with the Taxpayers Federation. However, soon after he was seen at the Ontario Provincial Election 2007 campaign commercial admitting to breaking his promise to not raise taxes. Many people are out of work and can barely make ends meet. So when Dalton McGuinty decided to merge the PST and GST to make the Harmonized Sales Tax, it is the people of Ontario that will ultimately pay the price. With HST it will be even harder for families to keep their finances afloat. Family would have to budget for extra cost when just going to fill up more gas for their car. Dalton has already stuck his hands deeply enough in our pockets. That is why the big change that Tim Hudak wanted to make if elected was to put more money back into our pockets. He wanted to give tax relief for families’ budgets by lowering income tax by 5% on the first $75,000 of taxable income. Also he wanted to get rid of the HST off of home energy bills and the cost of home heating. All these tax hikes was one reason why our economy is not growing, therefore this change would have truly helped restore Ontario’s reputation as an economic engine that helps Canada.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canadian Prime Minister

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Globalization means that Canada is playing an increasingly important role in other countries through foreign policies. Therefore, foreign leaders are providing additional checks and holding the Prime Minister responsible for the decisions they make (Baker, 2014). The media provides important checks and balances to the office of the Prime Minister through dissemination and interpretation of public information besides questioning government decisions. Enshrining public service by the laws and constitution by establishing the office of the Prime Minister reducing the public officers appointed by the Prime Minister will help reduce the powers of the Prime Minister. In addition, the parliament should be empowered through transfer of former Crown powers currently vested in the office of the Prime Minister (Axworthy,…

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Never in the constitution is stated that the head of the government can be removed from office if the people feel he/she no longer has the nations best interests at hand. Therefore, Canada proves to be more democratic by allowing the people/representatives to strip the head of government from power if they no longer feel like the interests of the people are being fulfilled. One could argue that that it is not mandatory for a Prime Minister and his cabinet to step down after they have lost the confidence of the House of Common, as it is a constitutional convention, and not a law. However, once the head of government loses the confidence of the lower house, it could potentially be challenging to get pass future legislations and bills in the house. Therefore, it is in the best interest of the Prime Minister and his cabinet to step…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Canadians are not happy with the current First Past the Post system currently in place for electing parliamentary officials provincially and federally. I think that Canada’s First Past the Post parliamentary electoral system should be changed because it favors tactical voting; it has a negative effect on smaller parties; and opens up the possibility of gerrymandering constituencies. A new electoral system that is more proportional is needed in order to address these problems.…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed analysis of democratic malaise in Canada, its main cause and the most effective mitigation strategy. This information will be provided to Leadnow.ca to help them create strategic campaigns in their push for equitable and democratic governance in Canada. Specifically, this paper will answer two related questions:…

    • 2427 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the limitations of the book was that key factors were omitted from the discussion on Proportional representation (PR) and the debate as to whether it should replace the current system of First Past the Post (FPTP). For example, it was not mentioned that PR would encourage the erosion of small interest orientated parties. Further omitted from the audit are the difficulties that would be associated with changing Canada's electoral format in relevance to educating an uninvolved population. As was seen in Citizens, the Canadian public is not highly interested in politics, or the political process, therefore teaching an uninterested population would certainly cause issues, particularly teaching elderly people who are habituated with the current…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrary to presidential systems, in parliamentary systems power is concentrated. There is no real head of state.Peole are nominated for the figure. Indeed, it is whether a monarch or a weak president. Power belongs to the Prime minister. Voters…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stages in an Election

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As Canadians, we have the right to have a say in who runs our country and makes all our major decisions for us, but the system in which we elect that person is a long and detailed one. Firstly, an election must take place at least every five years in Canada, and if wished to call an election any earlier, there are reasons and ways to do so. After government has been dissolved, a list of eligible voters is compiled and leaders are nominated. Once it is clear who the leaders are, the lengthy process of campaigning, where the media plays an important part in reporting the party’s platforms and opinion polls, officially begins. Lastly, the voters make their ways to polling stations where they cast their votes and the votes get counted. The new Prime Minister is then the leader of the main issues faced in Canada, such as healthcare, taxes, and family safety; therefore, it is important for you to have a say in who you wish to lead the country.…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a Parliamentary System, there is always a gap between law and fact. According to law, all powers of the Government are vested in the Chief Executive head who may be President as in India or Governor General as in Canada or King or Queen as in U.K. In actual fact all his powers are exercised by the Cabinet which is created out of the majority party in the legislature.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral System

    • 1295 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Elections are one of the most important factors in democracy; one-person one vote. The voting system is the heart of the representative. This system is what citizens use to create democratic government. Thus, if the voting system does not consider what the voters say, government will not be properly accountable and democracy will then be comprised. This is the core problem in the Canadian political system and our electoral system does not do justice to the Canadian voters. The system does not represent the people, most votes are wasted because in this current system not every vote counts; Canada’s current voting system is based on the winning-take-all principle. It is a system of winners and losers. Where in each riding, one group of voters get to send a Member of Parliament to Parliament, and the party with most seats is asked by the govern general to form a government. The party with second most seats in the House of Commons becomes the opposition. All the other voters in the riding lose. Thus, if you do not support the most popular party in your riding, your vote is ineffective and wasted. As Elections Canada said, the Single Member Plurality system used in all Canadian federal and provincial elections has much strength but also reveals serious weaknesses in producing legislatures that reflect the choice of parties made by the voters. In addition, recent Canadian elections have witnessed a significant fall in voter turnout, which some say indicates that structural changes are needed in order to encourage greater participation. The Single member plurality system clearly does not reflect the concerns of Canadian voters to the point where Canadians do not even bother to vote anymore because their problems and voices are not heard. Proportional Representation would be the best electoral system for Canada because; it produces a legislature that is representative of the views of…

    • 1295 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays