Preview

Why Did John Jay's Treaty Fail

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
588 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did John Jay's Treaty Fail
After the War of Independence the colonies were now free from British rule. However, that came with a price to pay. Being their own separate country, the United States, having a weak economy and many complaints and disagreements with Britain. In an attempt to resolve this problem, Washington sent John Jay, the current Supreme Court justice, to Britain to negotiate with the British. After making coming to terms with Great British, the Treaty of Amity, Commerce, and Navigation, commonly known as Jay’s Treaty was created. This treaty did nothing to help America. All this treaty did was hurt the American economy because large corporations couldn’t trade with the British West Indies, further divided the country between Federalists and Anti- Federalist, and only prolonged the …show more content…

Not only did Jay’s Treaty fail in preventing another war, but it also failed to address the requests that the American people wanted. While keeping in mind the United States’ weak economic and militarial position in the world in 1795, Jay’s treaty was not only an ineffective treaty, but in general a huge waste of time and money.
Not only did Jay’s Treaty, further divide the Federalist and Anti- Federalist, it also damaged the American economy greatly. Part of the treaty was that trade with the British West indies would basically be done. The Britsih West Indies was a heavy source of trade for several American corporations at this time, and John Jay and Alexander Hamilton, saw it as a way to try to fix the relationship with Britain, when it didn’t need fixing at all. British was still going to treat America the same way. Not only did Jay’s Treaty restrict the British West Indies, but it allowed British Ships to


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1793, the British government violated international law by ordering naval commanders to begin seizing any American ship that carried French goods or was sailing for a French port. By 1794, several Hundred American ships were confiscated. Choices were to Join the British navy or be imprisoned. The British also armed Indians to attack settlers. On April 16, 1794, Washington named John Jay as a special envoy to Great Britain. They made an agreement; Jay wanted them to settle all major issues: to get the British out of their forts along the Great Lakes, to secure reparations for the losses of American shippers, compensation for southern slaves carried away by British ships in 1783, and a new commercial treaty that would legalize American trade with the British West Indies. Jay accepted the British definition of neutral rights – that exports of tar, pitch and other products needed for warships were contraband and that such military products could not go in neutral ships to enemy ports – and the “rule of 1756” prevailed, meaning that trade was prohibited in peacetime because of mercantilist restrictions could not be opened in wartime. Britain also gained most-favored-nation treatment in American commerce and a promise that French privateers would not be outfitted in American ports. Finally, Jay conceded that the British need not compensate U.S. Citizens for the enslaved people who have escaped during the war and that the pre-Revolutionary American debts to the British merchants would be paid by the U.S. Government. In return, Jay won three important points: British evacuation of their six northwestern forts by 1796, reparations for the seizures of American ships and cargo in 1793 – 1794, and the right of American…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    was the Ghent Treaty a Failure or a Success in the views of Americans? How Did it affect the country ?…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jay’s Treaty is an agreement between John Jay, U.S. chief justice, special envoy, and William Grenville, a British foreign secretary. Signed in London, England, on November 19, 1794, and ratified by the U.S. Congress in 1795 the Treaty settled disagreements and distress between the United States and Great Britain. Both countries had unresolved issues remaining since violations occurred from the Treaty of Paris of 1783. England refused to evacuate the frontier forts in the Northwest Territory; and in addition seized American ships forcing American soldiers to participate in England’s war with France. The United States passed navigation laws that were to potentially damage England. It was because the commercial war between…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine this,being a kid in the 1700s and having to deal with war,death,and rivals that could possibly go to war and bring it to your home state.Im 1793,France and England went to war while America stayed out of it because they didn’t want to go war so the United States stayed out of it,in the middle the year,the United States and Britain signed the Jay's treaty which stopped most the problems of the two…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The previous policy of British rule over the colonies was Salutary Neglect, meaning the British would let the colonies govern themselves as long as they maintained fair trade relations with the British. Following the war, however, strict trade laws called the Navigation Acts made it so that Americans had restricted trade with places other than Britain. The Navigation Acts were a response to the lack of revenue mentioned in document F, and created a colonialist feeling of resentment towards the British. These feelings of resentment (in conjunction with many other feelings toward many other unfair acts that limited the prosperity of the colonies) led to the desire of a separate government, and ultimately the American…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author begins his discussion with how an average American is more or less aware of why The War of 1812 was fought or who we were even fighting against. Hickey informs his readers that there was no great president associated with the conflict. Although the war may be recognized as “Mr. Madison’s War,” Hickey believes that James Madison hardly reaches the standards of Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, or Franklin Roosevelt. Hickey specifies that The War of 1812’s causes are complex and can still be debated. The decisions of causes have been credited to a wide variety of motives. If the causes of the war are unclear, then the consequences are as well. Despite the fact the America was won most of their wars, The Was of 1812 is different. Hickey feels as if America was lucky to escape without making extensive compromise. The Treaty of Ghent does not specify the issues that had caused the war and contained nothing to suggest that the United States had achieved. The treaty solely provided the affairs occurring before the war began.…

    • 825 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For about a century after British colonists settled in America, they were subject to little political constriction under England’s policy of salutary neglect, but when the settlers were threatened by the French and their native American allies, the mother country stepped in and fought to protect the colonies. The war was named “The Seven Year War”. The seven year war changed the friendship between the mother country and the colonies. The change was especially in an ideological sense. The French and Indian War (1754-1763) altered the political, economical, and ideological relations between Britain and its American colonies. English debt lead to unfair taxation of the colonists, and this changed the way they felt about their mother country.What was also altered was, the expansion of land in America that was once uncovered, the way the Americans strived for independence after the war, and the…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although both and Britain were to follow by the regulations of the treaty, both sides still disobeyed. North America did not follow the fact that they had to return the land of the loyalists (Treaty Paris 1). Britain did not follow the orders to American slaves they owned back to America (Treaty Paris 1). This Treaty…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The four distinct features of the late 1700’s on U.S. foreign policy were to emancipate from the dependence of Europe, provide for an American market of production, to protect Americans by sea, and general peace. Based on the “No Entangling Alliances” Jefferson’s main goal was clearing all debt and breaking tides with Europe. Although Jefferson wanted to break away from Europe roots he couldn’t stress enough on the importance of over sea trade. For as it was in the best interest of America to open trade with foreign markets. Due to France and Britain wanting to have control over all imports and exports, Jefferson deployed naval vessels to protect the coast of America. Finally, Jefferson wanted peace for the nation not wanting to deal with the…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, being involved in the war and having enemies has a negative impact on America’s trade, “whenever a war breaks out between England and any foreign power, the trade of America goes to ruin” (102). Furthermore,…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Embargo Dbq

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When Jefferson assumed his presidency he faced several foreign policy issues. One was the issue of British impressing our ships; they would take sailors from American ships and force them to serve in the British navy. One particular incident referred to as “The Leopard Affair” pushed Jefferson to enact the Embargo Act of 1807. Jefferson created this act in order to avoid war with Britain and to appease the public. He knew we would be no match against the British navy, so he figured we could protect ourselves from the English by way of this act. Although he had good intentions, Jefferson did not take into account the effect the Embargo Act would have on our country’s economy. Since the embargo act prevented us from trading with Britain and France, we suffered economically.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty of Paris 1783- The Treaty of Paris officially ended the war between Great Britain and the United States. The Treaty declared the United States of America as an independent nation and established boundaries that extended far to the west of the original 13 colonies. They were originally ruled by the King of England and he wasn’t at all fair to them. He would tax the colonists and it made them want to become independent.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, the aftermath of the Boston Tea Party resulted in the British Parliament wanting to make the colonists pay for their actions. Lord North, who was the Prime Minister of Great Britain, was forced with many complaints and comments from British parliament regarding their authority over the American colonists. In response to the tea account that happened on December 16, 1773, the British swiftly closed all ports of Boston for any kind of trade until all tea that was destroyed was paid for (Foner 147-148). In addition, British parliament put into action two more regulations that limited colonists’ freedom rights after the Boston Tea Party account. The push of supremacy from the British led the American colonists to stand up and fight for their freedom. Furthermore, Hewes historical account allowed American’s to receive a primary insight from a major participant regarding an event that shaped “America” into what it is today. Without the determination of the colonists to defend their liberty, we might have never had the pivotal moment that made American’s stand their ground, that led to the signing of the Declaration of…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Jay once said “ This country will be led, by the insecurity of property, the losing of confidence in their rulers, and the want of public faith and rectitude, to consider the charms of liberty imaginary and delusive, and would embrace.almost any change that may promise them quiet and security." He was warning George Washington about all the bad things to come if the Constitution did not go into effect. John Jay was a strong Federalist and was going to fight for the people. Jay was an active supporter of the U.S. Constitution, and when he saw that the U.S. possessed a weak central government, he was determined to do something and that’s what he did. Jay was also chose for the governor of New york when he returned from England.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The bargaining position of America was weak. According to Document D, all the U.S. could do was to “respectfully” ask Great Britain to lower its trade restrictions with the U.S. Because the U.S. Was expanding westward, navigations along the Mississippi became increasingly important to the economic well being of the U.S. Again the U.S. bargaining position, this time with Spain, was weak because the U.S. could not secure a treaty in total accordance with its economic stance and this treaty “would be limited” to a certain length of time.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays