Preview

Why Did Lenin Lose The 1917 Russian Revolution

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1089 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Lenin Lose The 1917 Russian Revolution
There was, however, an attempt to bring the Romanovs back to their rightful place on the Russian throne, a revolt of which your father and I chose to keep secret from you and your siblings. The letters from members of the Constitutional Democratic Party had been piling up, each one mentioning a plan to rid Russia of the Bolsheviks. The revolt had finally come in 1917 at the hands of General Lavr Kornilov with a mission to end the revolution and bring our family, primarily Nicholas, back to Russia to rule as czar. Devastatingly, Lenin and the Bolsheviks had won with their Red Army, and my dreams of returning to Russia were crushed once again. Over the years I grew more and more disgusted by Lenin’s success and I felt horribly for the Russian people who had been betrayed by him, especially after his signing of the Treaty of Brest Litvosk with Germany. This …show more content…
I had watched Lenin die of a stroke, something of which I can hardly feel sympathy for. However, it was the future that I feared the most. What would become of Russia? Who would take Lenin’s place? The two people who had run to take his spot, to me, had and still continue scare me to the core. Trotsky, a man that I’m sure you still remember, was one option, but even he wasn’t the worst. It was the so called “man of steel”, otherwise known as Joseph Stalin. I had watched him talk to his wife Nadia of his plans every night, his horrid plans of becoming dictator of Russia. At the time my intuition had told me that the future of Russia held its own Reign of Terror. I had even tried to warn people of the dangerous man to whom the leadership of Russia was to be granted. I broke mirrors whenever he walked by, and even wrote on windows “Stalin’s Reign of Terror”, but it was to no avail. The people of Russia had not heard my warning, and I’m glad you never had to suffer along with the Russian civilians of that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Everyone is a product of their circumstance, yet, consequential individuals can shape events within their times. Leon Trotsky, key member of the Russian Bolshevik party in the early 20th century, exemplifies this statement. Born into a period of turbulent change socially and politically, due to the Russian industrial revolution, Trotsky was shaped by his context and events in early life. However, it is to a greater extent that Trotsky was a significant player and shaper of events within his times, being the November revolution of 1917 and the Russian civil war. Yet, as fervor for change lessened, so did Trotsky’s prominence; he was too associated with International Marxism to adapt to the new world.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The extent of a balanced interpretation of Trotsky within history varies throughout the differing aspects of his life and personality, however it can be considered that overall, it offers a balanced interpretation to a limited extent. His position as a Marxist offers a more unbalanced interpretation, as perspectives vary from stating that he was a practical Marxist idealist to perceiving him as a bloodthirsty terrorist. Similarly, interpretations of Trotsky appear unbalanced when considering his role as a propagandist through his oratorical skills and writing, which allowed for him to be viewed as a great Bolshevik figurehead, whilst Soviet Realism effectively eliminated his significance within history, and vilified him. Within his role as Commissar for War, however, offers a more balanced opinion as it is widely regarded both during his time and in more contemporary times that he was incredibly fit for the role, however there are still interpretations that vary from the romanticised notion of Trotsky as War Commissar. Therefore it can be considered that when considering different aspects of his life, the extent of a balanced interpretation varies, however that overall history offers a limited balanced interpretation of Trotsky, as within each segment of his life, there is no real mutual consensus, as differing contexts and agendas behind documenting history aim to colour Trotsky in different ways. Historiography allows for these differing opinions to be recognised as due to the different contexts and agendas behind historians for documenting Trotsky’s history, as history is a humanised process and thus flaws can be evident within the differing interpretations of Trotsky’s character.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What were the results of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and what happened to the Romanov family?…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nonetheless, with the release of the “April Theses” by Lenin, the Bolsheviks support grew. The “April Theses” pushed what Lenin thought Russia needed most at that time: ‘Peace, Bread and Land.’ This vastly appealed to masses of the lower working class of Russia; they had been exhausting this for years; the mass famine across Russia, the land controversy’s that exploited the peasant populace, which approximately made up 80% of the Russian population, and the continuation of the war, which…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many Russians were infuriated by the government because the Tsar did not take action when the country was deteriorating. In addition, he failed to carry his people during the war. With this catastrophe, the Russians demanded for their voices to be heard and for a change in the government and as a result, war occurred within the country. Selfish people, like Nicholas II who kept all the power to himself, often affect others deeply, or foster terrible consequences. For example, one may take all the credit for working on a group project. Other group members will feel injustice and demand for credit to be given to them since they worked as hard as all the others did. Likewise, the Tsar’s decision to maintain power led to citizens rioting and the fall of his power. People should always think about their actions before executing them, or else the aftermath would be…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Let us examine the way Trotsky’s intellect and passion ensured he played a significant in the Soviet Union in 1869-1940 but simultaneously defeated him. Aaronson claims that, like a tragic hero, “Trotsky’s strengths were inseperable from his weaknesses”. The accuracy of this claim is supported by many of Trotsky’s revolutionary actions and writings.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miriam Dobson argues that Khrushchev’s speech was necessary for voicing the ordeals of ordinary people who suffered under Stalinism who would otherwise be unheard: ‘…only the Secret speech allowed their stories to be told’. Stalinism, according to Khrushchev, was associated with ‘an army of willing perpetrators of terror, but also a mentality of fear, subservience, deceit and stifled initiative’. As such, it is also important to recognise that the critique of Stalin had only taken place once Stalin and his system had firmly established control – it was the ruler that had to be condemned, rather than the line of…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Last of the Romanovs

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The fall of the Romanov Empire changed the face of Russia forever. The royal family, led by Nicholas II, we're imprisoned and eventually assassinated by the Bolsheviks, a political party founded by Vladimir Lenin and Alexander Bogdanov whose main focus was to eliminate the monarchy and employ their own form of democracy. Tsar Nicholas II, his wife, Alexandra, and their only son, Alexei, heir apparent to the throne, were all integral figures in this historical evolution of Russia and its people.…

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Seizure of power appeared more prominently due to the nature of 1917, in which the April Theses was published, the July Days occurred and the Kornilov Affair, which emphasised the weaknesses of the Provisional Government. However, it is how the Bolsheviks enabled their power through 1917: through their powerful, hard hitting propaganda or through the Provisional Government’s failures. Interpretations [A] and [B] focus more on Lenin’s domineering nature, and how he exudes control in order to enable power, whilst [C] and [D] clearly display Lenin and the Bolsheviks as beneficiaries of the Provisional Government’s failures. Though it can be seen that Lenin’s determination clearly allowed for support to grow for the Bolsheviks, it does appear that the conditions of chaos in 1917 emphasised the Provisional Government’s weaknesses, and ultimately the Kornilov Affair was the most important factor in enabling Lenin and the Bolsheviks to seize power and interpretation [C] is the most reliable in assessing this view, as it depicts the effects of the Kornilov Affair and specifically how it benefitted Lenin and the Bolsheviks.…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lenin's Brutality

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Every year, thousands of people flock to the cold and dreary Red Square in Moscow, Russia.” Located there is something remarkably peculiar. In a cold, damp, and dark mausoleum lies Vladimir Lenin’s lifeless, preserved body. Frozen in time because of science, the body has been an attraction to many throughout the decades. While traveling thousands of miles to see the body of a man who was long dead may seem strange, the actions of Lenin makes it stranger. Although he was certainly an influential man, changing the political landscape of Russia forever and creating a global superpower, Lenin has a darker side. While the genocide of his successor, Joseph Stalin, live in infamy, Lenin is often overlooked for his evil. Lenin brutally killed thousands…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Romanov Dynasty

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When discussing why public opinion of the tsar was so easily pliable in the lead up to revolution in 1917, we must acknowledge that Russia was evolving rapidly. As modern historians and public spectators, it is simple to map out how Russian society became a pressure cooker of discontent and anger. Mass industrialisation made living for a working, urban class almost unbearable, the class divide was still rigid, revolutionary ideas from the West offered a foundation to base claims for the removal of the autocratic system, and the pressures of World War 1 served to unite the people in one cause to end hardship. These factors stoked a population already vying for change and such an environment made revolution in Petrograd (St Petersburg) in the February of 1917 almost inevitable, foreshadowing the end of the…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    WW1 had left Russia in physical and economical deastation. Under the command of the Tsar, the army had suffered many humiliating defeats and over a million men had died. Families were desperate for the army to return, and men were needed in Russia to take factory jobs,as industry and production had come to a near stand-still, and in a particularly bitter winter, famine was sweeping Petrograd. Lenin's promise of the end of war seemed even more appealing.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays