Preview

Why Did Phillip II Launch The Armada And Why Did It Fail? (brief)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
428 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Phillip II Launch The Armada And Why Did It Fail? (brief)
Why did Phillip II launch the Armada and why did it fail? In the summer of 1588, the catholic king of Spain, Phillip II, came up with a plan to conquer protestant England. He would collect his army from the Netherlands and a huge fleet of 130 ships across the channel, with the help of France.

Why did Phillip launch the Armada?- Phillip launched the Armada for many reasons. When Elizabeth became queen, Phillip asked her hand in marriage, but she refused. This angered him, as he hoped to keep power over England, and also keep it catholic. This was also an embarrassment as Spain was one of he most powerful countries in Europe. England was also helping protestants in the Netherlands, (which Spain ruled) to revolt against the catholic Spanish. As well as helping the Portrageas gain their independence from Spain. Phillip also had the support of the Pope who encouraged him to invade England. Elizabeth had been excommunicated from the church so the pope thought she ought to be removed. During the 1560's English ships began to loot Spanish fleets returning from America with gold. Phillip blamed Elizabeth for backing such raids and taking her share of the profits. In 1587 Elizabeth executed Mary queen of Scots which also angered Phillip as he saw Mary as the rightful queen of England.

Why the armada failed- Phillips plan was to send a fleet from Spain and an army from the Netherlands to invade at the same time. England was aware of the Spanish plans, attacking at Cádiz, in Spain and succeeding in delaying it for another year. This meant that the Spanish had to use old, not so good boats for the invasion. The barrels were also destroyed and so the new ones were unseasoned so when the food was put in them, the barrels and food rotted. The man in charge of the Spanish armada was the duke of Medina Scronia, he was not a sea captain, and he was in charge of the army and was sea sick! The English admirals were experienced and well trained. When in the channel and fighting, the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    loss of men and ammunition (Geoffrey Parker, Why the Armada Failed). When the fleet finally returned to Lisbon it brought the treasure ships back intact but it was clear that the Armada was no longer ready to mount the full scale invasion of England. Drake had given England another year to prepare for the Spanish Armada.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Spain was experiencing their Golden Age in the sixteenth century because of their exploration of South America that opened doors for trading and allies. This trade (that included gold) gave their economy budget a boost. However, they were seriously defeated after the English raided their ships. As we know, the Spanish Armada defeat was one of the most tragic defeats in Spanish history under Philip II’s rule. This defeat hurt their economy even more and nearly all their power was gone, until the Treaty of Pyrenees officially gave up Spanish power to…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Spanish Armada- Spain’s HUGE army fleat that sailed against England in attempt to claim North America.…

    • 2391 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Spanish Armada failed because of many things, most of them were because of they did not done a proper preparation for the battle. The Spanish was very weak and unorganized, they know that they were, but they still don’t do any preparation, as if they knew that they will lose. They did not done well in the tactics, ship design and choosing their leader. If they can’t do these basic things of winning a battle, it will be very easy to lose.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    i) In 1588, Phillip sent a fleet of ships, called the Invincible Armada, but the British quickly defeated them.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oppositely, Phillip and Fredrick William disagreed on foreign policies. During Phillip’s reign, Spain was known as “the Empire on which the sun never sets,” for it became so large through his expansionist mindset. Philip II created military campaigns to defend Catholic Europe, for example his 1588 failed invasion of Protestant England. In contrast, Fredrick held a large European army, yet had little to no military campaigns throughout his ruling. Domestic matters concerned him more than foreign, such as agriculture and primary schools to benefit his nation in the long run. He looked upon the manual of Regulations for State Officials with great…

    • 648 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    6. The uniting of Spain lead to their desire to beat the Portuguese in the race to gain wealth from the Indies. The “stage was now set” because everyone wanted to tap into more riches.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    05 02 Magazine Template 1

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You will compare an absolute monarch with a constitutional monarch. Select one monarch from each l…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Coming up with devious ways to defeat the Spaniards worse than they did him, mapping out the trade routes of the ships coming and going in and out of Spain he would eventually find a weak point. In 1572 having obtained from the queen a privateering commission, which amounted to a license to plunder in the king of Spain’s lands Drake set sail for America in command of two small ships, the 70-ton Pasha and the 25-ton Swan. He was nothing if not ambitious and ready for the battle, for his aim was to capture the important town of Nombre de Dios, Pan. Although Drake was wounded in the attack, which failed, he and his men managed to get away with a great deal of plunder by successfully attacking a silver-bearing mule train. This was perhaps the foundation of Drake’s fortune. In the interval between these episodes, he crossed the Isthmus of Panama. Standing on a high ridge of land, he first saw the Pacific, that ocean hitherto barred to all but Spanish ships. It was then, as he put it, that he “besought Almighty God of His goodness to give him life and leave to sail once in an English ship in that sea.” (Sir Francis Drake). He returned to England both rich and famous. Unfortunately, his return coincided with a moment when Queen Elizabeth and King Philip II of Spain had reached a temporary truce. Although delighted with Drake’s success in the empire of her great enemy, Elizabeth could not officially acknowledge piracy. Drake saw that the time was inauspicious and sailed with a small squadron to Ireland, where he served under the earl of Essex and took part in a notorious massacre in July 1575. In which he seemingly disappeared off the face of the Earth as there are no recorded accounts of him until…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles V of Spain wanted to marry Mary to his child Philip II of Spain, who was also a Catholic, but before Philip travelled to England, it was a rebellion led by Thomas Wyatt against Mary. He had the intention to kill Mary and then crown Elizabeth. By this time Elizabeth was ordered to go to London fearing that she would be implicated in the rebellion, but despite the order, she did not go. There were rumours of Elizabeth supporting the revolt. Mary wanted to believe Elizabeth was guilty because, according to Abigail Archer, for Mary, Elizabeth represented a continuing threat.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Spanish King Phillip II also took advantage of the situation in Europe for the gain of himself and his advisors. The section of the Dutch Declaration of Independence presented in Document 9 speaks at length about how Phillip would, “tyrannize at pleasure,” the Low Countries, primarily the Netherlands, while supposedly attempting to quash Protestantism. Instead, it seems, he violently subjugated the Dutch so that he could increase his own, “reputation and grandeur,” all the while allowing those close to him to have positions in, “the richest abbeys,” making a mockery of the supposedly sacred duties of bishops. The Declaration also plainly states that this was all done under, “the mask of religion.” In addition to his violence in the Netherlands, Phillip also tried to use his religion to fulfil his agenda against England. As Pope Pius said in a letter to the Guises, he supports, “all such means as shall be deemed necessary,” to reclaim England and save it from being, “oppressed by the heretics.” Even though the Pope intended to do this by supporting Mary, Queen of Scots, he still allowed Phillip to attempt to invade England after Mary’s execution, especially after Elizabeth started overtly supporting the Protestant rebellions in the…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So Philip launched the Spanish Armada in an attempt to punish Protestant England. He also raised taxes in the Netherland and took steps to crush Protestantism. To show his devotion to the church Philip poured a great deal of money into the palace El Escorial.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phillip II, King of Macedonia was murdered in 336 BC when he attended the wedding between his daughter, Cleopatra and his brother in law, Alexander of Epirus. As he walked into the theatre where the wedding was to be held, he was fatally stabbed by a man named Pausanias, his head of guards. There were many theories behind the reason for Pausanias’ actions. Many said that it was pent up anger that drove Pausanias, while others suggested that Phillip’s wife, Olympias of Epirus and his son; Alexander had put him up to it. The Lyncestis brothers (a notable Macedonian family), Antipater (a powerful politician), Demosthenes (a prominent Greek statesmen and orator) and the Persian King Darius III were all said to be involved in the murder of Phillip.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    She was able to use it to bring victory to England on the battlefield. Elizabeth was also “taught the art of public speaking, unheard of for women at the time. But the ability to address a large number of people, from ministers in Parliament to troops on the battlefield, stood Elizabeth in good stead for the future. She learnt how to turn the tide of opinion in her favour, and this became one of her most effective weapons” (Briscoe). This became valuable in the 1580s when the war between England and Spain became apparently inevitable. The Spanish Armada was a fleet of 130 ships that King Phillip of Spain planned to sail into the English Channel to meet with an army coming from the Netherlands and simultaneously invade England. However, Elizabeth’s men were maintaining a close watch on the shores of England for the Armada, and when the first ship was spotted fighting erupted. As English soldiers and sailors were fighting for England’s independence, the Queen was headed for Tilbury. “She was not going to sit trembling inside a guarded Palace while her people fought, but was going to go to the coast of the battle and ‘live or die’ with them” (Thomas, “The Spanish Armada”). Here, she made what could be her most famous speech, the Tilbury Speech, where she stated, “I know I have the body of a meek and feeble woman, but I have the heart and stomach of a King,…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All substantial threats to Elizabeth’s position as Queen were symptoms of the tension between Catholicism and Protestantism. The threats posed by Mary Queen of Scots, as well as those of the Spanish Armada of 1588 and the war with Spain (which dominated the last twenty years of Elizabeth’s reign), were consequences of a Catholic desire to gain supremacy in England. However, the extent to which the Catholic threat was centred on Mary Queen of Scots is debateable. Whilst she was undoubtedly a figurehead for Catholic opposition to Elizabeth’s rule and was the monarchical figure around whom several treasonous plots were designed, there is much evidence for the view that Mary became a focal point for a Catholic threat that would have existed even if she had been absent. The extent to which the structure given to the Catholic cause by Mary’s presence strengthened the Catholic threat is also debateable. There were others who could have become the rallying point for Catholic opposition (as Philip II of Spain did after Mary’s death), although none had as good a claim to the throne as Mary. A great threat was presented by Catholic opposition to Elizabeth’s rule, but Mary’s influence over this, and therefore the threat that she posed as an individual, may be called into question.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays