Preview

Why did support for the Whigs decline in the years 1832- 1841?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1022 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why did support for the Whigs decline in the years 1832- 1841?
Why did support for the Whigs decline in the years 1832- 1841?

After the Whigs electoral victory of 1832, how was it that the Tories were able to win the election in 1841, there were many factors that contributed to the enormous decline in Whig support during the reform years. The Whigs were running out of ideas by 1835. There was increasing economic depression, defections to the other side of the House occurred, the Whig ministries witnessed the rise of public pressure groups, the Whigs were viewed as being cynical and devious after the Litchfield House Compact. In comparison, the Conservative Party’s strength showed a huge increase after the passing of the Reform Act due to party organization under the Carlton Club and Registration Societies, the strength of Peel as a politician and the Conservatives' willingness not to use their power and influence in the House of Lords unconstitutionally.

A substantial reason for the unpopularity of the Whigs was the limitations of the Great Reform Act of 1832. The reform act did very little to appease the working class and was referred to as ‘The Great Betrayal”. Now voters were required to possess a property worth ten pounds, which at the time was actually quite a substantial amount, which not many working classes would have. So this just further aggravated the divide between the middle class and working class, which helped give rise to the Chartist Movement.

Initially, the Whigs had won the political battle over the 1832 Reform Act as a result of nationwide confrontation with the Tories and the House of Lords. However, Earl Grey's successor, Lord Melbourne relaxed the aggression of the reformation programme and towards their last few years as the ruling government, the Whigs lost many opportunities to improve social conditions in towns and working conditions in factories and had no further resolved the issue of Free Trade until 1841. So this points towards the fact that the Whigs were simply not willing to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At the time Labour was a significantly divided party with the Gaitskillites and the Bevanites meaning some support of voters was lost through lack of assurance that the party would lead with strength and could make decisions that were right for the nation and not selfish. The Labour economy policies are also a reason why they lost. Gaitskell promised to increase public spending without increasing taxes. This put his credibility under question. Another reason is that although voters were happy with the nationalisation of electricity, gas, atomic energy and airline industries they thought public ownership of coal and the railways had been a failure when they were last in government and there was little enthusiasm for further nationalisation which Labour was committed to by Clause Four of the Labour Party Constitution.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Balfour's leadership along with other key factors, including chamberlain's influence, the Boer war and the liberal party's actions, overall led to the decline in popularity for the conservative party giving the liberals their first taste of power in the 1906 general election.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is argued by some that Peel was greatly successful up to 1841 due to the fact that he brought the Tory Party from being a “beleaguered minority” (Adelman, 1989) to being a strong, relevant power once again. However, this ‘low point’ of 1832 is often greatly exaggerated by admirers of Peel. Arguably the high levels of support that the Whig’s received in the election of 1832 was predominantly down to the fact that they advocated the issue of Parliamentary Reform, meaning that it can be argued that the period of unpopularity that the Tory party suffered in 1832 could only ever have been temporary. Arguably even if Peel had not advocated the policies which many consider to be very ‘successful’, the fortunes of the Tory Party would have still recovered, as many of the newly enfranchised voters, far from punishing the Tories, enjoyed the exclusivity of Parliament and wanted to retain that exclusivity through conservative policies. Although the skills of Peel as an orator did contribute to the Tory revival to a certain extent, the Whig majority in Parliament was so fundamentally fragile that it hardly needed exploitation by Peel. Although Peel did contribute to disuniting the Whig majority by, for example, exploiting the Whig difficulties in the management of Anglican Church funds in Ireland, the opportunity to do so arose spontaneously, and merely needed to be…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How successful were the social and economic reforms introduced by Tory governments in the years 1819 to 1829?…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ID TERMS APUSH Chapter13-15

    • 3595 Words
    • 15 Pages

    1. National-Republicans: They became the Whig party during Jackson's second term. John Quincy Adams and Henry Clay guided this party in the 1830s. They were the Jeffersonian Republicans, along with numerous former Federalists who believed that the national government should advocate economic development. They were united by their opposition of Jackson's policies, committed to Clay's American System and believed in active intervention by the government to change society. They became a national party with appeal by 1836.…

    • 3595 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Did Harrison Fail

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry Clay and Daniel Webster wanted to control the government, and they planned to basically take over during Harrison’s term. Although they had a good plan, one thing failed. Harrison died 4 weeks into the job and John Tyler was now in office. Harrison was devoted to the Whig party and many of the things that the Whig party said they were going to do were shut down by Tyler. For example, the Whig's had a plan to establish a new bank, called the Fiscal Bank…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reform of the electoral system finally arrived with the 1832 Reform Act, which increased the proportion of eligible voters in England and Wales to 18 per cent of the adult-male population and 12 per cent in Scotland. Although the working classes had high hopes for the Reform Act, they eventually felt betrayed as despite the new legislation, the poor ultimately remained voiceless in the way their country was run. In the years following the Reform Act, the Chartists would begin to plan their campaign to try to effect real electoral change in Britain.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government’s economic policies had also caused discontent. First of all the Corn Law was introduced in 1815 which was to block all foreign corn from being imported into the country, this was done to protect the price of wheat in Britain, as in the time of war farmers did very well and they had lot of demand but not enough supplies to give out. The government simply wanted the landowner to have the same profits as they had during war. There was discontent because of the Corn Laws as there were riots and petitions against it. Another policy introduced was that Income Tax (pay tax on how much you earn) was abolished which did not affect the poor but the rich instead however and the…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many reasons why the Liberals introduced reforms. My first and in my opinion, most important reason why the Liberals introduced reforms was the politically motivated, political rivalries. Winston Churchill’s former party the Conservatives had already brought in some reforms, which showed the first signals for the Liberals to do so too. However, it was the newly formed Labour party which were the big competitors for the Liberals. They begun to start gaining votes and were an emerging threat. The Liberals wanted to win over ordinary people so that they would vote the Liberals instead of Labour. David Lloyd George realised that he would gain votes from the working class and would be kept in power if he introduced the reforms, as he makes clear in a speech given in 1906, ‘We must eliminate the widespread poverty which scars this land glittering with wealth, otherwise the working men of Britain will vote Labour instead of Liberal’. This quote makes it clear that one of the reasons the Liberals brought in the reforms was because of their concerns and rivalry with Labour.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Whigs favored more governmental involvement in commerce and favored the National Bank (like the Federalists) and industrial growth. They opposed rapid, uncontrollable settlement in the west. Southern and Northern businessmen supported the Whigs (they favored the wealth). The Whig party was led by former National-Republicans Daniel Webster and Henry Clay. The platform of the Whigs bared remarkable similarities to that of the old Federalist Party. The Whigs supported a more active national government that would check the "excesses of unrestricted individualism." The Whigs were also very supportive of the National Bank. They agreed with Hamilton in saying that it was "necessary and proper" in running the government and the economy smoothly. Henry Clay’s American System was similar to Hamilton’s economic system. The goal was to make America economically independent by increasing industrial production in the United States and by the Creation of the Second National Bank (bank, tariff, and internal…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of course, the difference between the 2 parties beliefs on federal government size are: Democrats want small and more states rights, and Whigs wanted larger federal government. However, the federal government plays a key role in the economy and the workforce. At the time, the Whigs supported a more industrialized and manufacturing version of the U.S. This was what they wanted the majority economy to come from, even though the Democrats were more invested in the agricultural aspect…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists vs Whigs

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although historically represented as distinct parties, the Federalists and the Whigs in fact shared a common political ideology, represented many of the same interest groups and proposed similar programs and policies. Assess this.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Populist Party was a short-lived political party in the United States in the late 19th century. It flourished particularly among western farmers, based largely on its opposition to the gold standard. Although the party did not remain a lasting feature of the political landscape, many of its positions have become adopted over the course of the following decades. The very term "populist" has since become a generic term in U.S. politics for politics which appeals to the common person in opposition to established interests. Initially, the Populist government failed to achieve its goals of better government, however in the coming years, some of their ideas were to be developed.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between the years of 1830 and 1840 the two main competing political parties in America were the Jacksonian Democratic Party and the Whig Party. These two parties did not only vary in their ideology, but also in the region of America where they were strongest. The Whigs were mostly in the north and supported far different ideas regarding the social, and economic build of the country, and western expansion, than their southern counterparts, the Democrats.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the 1906 election around 1895-1902 the conservative party were massively successful and the strongest government party around. This was because they had Lord Salisbury as a leader who was seen as a leader for both middle class and working class people in Britain; the liberal party was weak as they were fighting themselves over Ireland home rule which meant that the conservatives had an advantage as it meant that people were not voting for the liberals and so instead voted conservative; the conservative party had the majority of seats in the House of commons consequently they could get almost any rule passed through whereas the liberal party could not; conservatives had changed the way they operated from reactionary to pragmatic and the conservatives did not want home rule and as a result people supported them.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays