Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Why did the 1905 revolution in Russia fail

Good Essays
1789 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why did the 1905 revolution in Russia fail
Why did the 1905 revolution in Russia fail?

The Russian revolution in 1905 failed due to many reasons such as the government’s issues, public’s action, and the loyalty to the Tsar by the armed forces and many other reasons.

During the 1905 revolution one reason as to why the revolution failed was due to the number of strikes done by industry workers. In February 1905, 400,000 workers went on strike due to the response of the bloody Sunday, the strikes were organised by the unhappy workers and were not organised by the revolutionaries (in fact the revolutionaries were taken by surprise by the sheer number of strikes in Russia). Due to the fact that there had been a lot of riots in the past in Russia the peasants and workers had developed some organising abilities, the strikers created soviets which were worker’s councils which would direct the strike, the first strike was in St Petersburg then it moved to Moscow and then to other industrial centres. This was the first general strike which was the most throughout and successful in Russian history as due to their actions the whole of Russia became paralysed and as the railway workers went on strike the government were instantly threatened as the railways were important for the movement of troops. The strikes weren’t very effective in making the revolution fail as the strikes done by the workers were actually successful and in hindsight it helped the revolution win but however the strikes led to the revolution as it caused the government to recognise lots of problems and encouraged the government to step up and help solve the problems so it was one of the turning points.
Also another reason the 1905 Russian revolution failed was due to the mutinies which were done by the armed forces and navy. When the after effects of bloody Sunday happened mutinies started to occur in parts of the army and navy. One of the mutinies that occurred in the black sea fleet in June 1905, the crew inside the battleship known as the Potemkin killed a few of their own officers and they took control of the ship and blasted the black sea port of Odessa, after they did this they then made their way to Romania as it is a neutral country. The mutinies weren’t widespread but they did recessive publicity and they helped to undermine the tsar’s authority. The mutiny wasn’t effective in making the revolution fail because some members of the army and the navy rebelled against the Tsar’s authority by killing their own officers which would encourage others to join in the efforts of the revolution however, it did help the revolution fail as hardly anyone from the army and navy rebelled against the tsar as they were all loyal to the Tsar.
Also another reason the 1905 Russian revolution failed was due to the St Petersburg soviet. During the revolution an assembly of workers were known as the St Petersburg soviet, the soviets were due to the general strike in the capital which started in October 1905. Workers from the capital elected ambassadors who would represent the soviets, it gained many members (400) and they represented 96 factories. The leading member of the soviets was Leon Trotsky. The Soviets demanded for radical social reform but they spent most of their time organising strikes and making sure that all the strikers were fed. Btu the soviets ended on the 3rd of December due to the fact that the government’s troops arrested the leaders. The St Petersburg Soviets were effective in making the revolution fail as the group didn’t push their ideas through about their policies as they were too busy feeding there strikers which isn’t good as they weren’t getting across their messages which in hindsight would led to them losing the revolution and the group was destroyed as soon as the leaders were captured which shows that without the soviet leaders the rest of the soviets couldn’t function so they never reformed the group and the strikes had little power over the strikers which meant that all their efforts were in vain, however it did help the revolution as it shows that the workers were cable of organising themselves and standing up against the government.
Another reason as to why the Russian revolution failed was the loyalty of the armed forces. Even though there were a few munities, most of the army stayed loyal to the Tsar; in turn this lead to the army destroying many disturbances which were to do the revolution, the army also arrested thousands of people who were revolutionaries. In October 1905 the government started to gain back the authority as the government supported the formation of the new political group known as the ‘union of Russian people’ which linked to pro-government terrorists groups known as the black hundreds. They helped the government regain control of Russia and with the black hundreds help they hunted and executed thousands of reformers. This was an important reason as to why the Russian revolution failed as if the armed forces hadn’t been loyal to the tsar then they wouldn’t have been able to put a stop to a lot of the disturbances the revolution caused, however it also help people to win the revolution because the government thought some members of the army could turn on them at any minute due to the events on the Potemkin which would cause doubt in the government on whether they could fully trust members of the army.
Another reason as to why the revolution failed is due to the unity amongst the revolutionaries. The revolutionaries had no unity due to the fact that they had different opinions on what should happen to Russia, the liberals wanted to share power with the tsar, the social revolutionaries wanted peasant ownership of land, the social democrats were divided between two different groups (Mensheviks and Bolsheviks) and they wanted to completely change society and remover the tsar and as a result of this the different radical parities fought against each other rather than fight the government. The group outbreaks were not planned which meant that the armed forces, police and black hundreds could overpower them. This help lead to the failure of the revolution due to the fact that as the demonstrations were random and not well thought out the army could deal with them more easily and put a stop to them and the government were never threatened by the parties which meant that all the efforts they did were in vein.
One of the other reasons for the failure of the revolution was the October manifesto. Due to all the uprisings, strikes and mutinies the Tsar’s government issued a proclamation which was the October manifesto, the manifesto promised reform and it accepted the idea of an elected national parliament to be created, it also planned to give everyone the right of freedom and speech, religion and civil rights. Due to this many liberals accepted the manifesto and those liberals were known as the Octobrists, other liberals known as the kadets saw the manifesto as the beginning of a new era of reform. But more radical groups such as the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks wanted major social and economic reform. This is an important reason as to why the revolution failed as it led the lack of unity among the revolutionaries as all the parties were divided as some agreed to the manifesto whilst others didn’t, and the October manifesto started the process of where the Tsar would regain control of Russia.
One of the other failures for the revolution was the black hundred. The black hundreds were a group of people who helped the government maintain their control on the country; the black hundreds found thousands of known reformers and executed them as they were betraying the tsar. The black hundreds group helped the revolution failed as they hunted down reforms and killed them which meant that they were helping the government stop the groups from trying to reform Russia.
From all the reasons I have collected I think that there were many features that led to the revolution failing such as the Loyalty of the Armed Forces, the Unity amongst the revolutionaries, October Manifesto and Black Hundreds. I think these were the key features as the armed forces were loyal to the tsar which meant that they could stop the strikes from getting too big and out of control and if the armed forces hadn’t of been loyal to the Tsar then it would have been much harder for the Tsar and the government to defend the disturbances of the revolutionaries, the unity amongst the revolutionaries was a key feature to as the revolutionaries didn’t get on as they had to many opinions which made them have many conflicts even though they just wanted Russia to be better and so they didn’t organise any strikes and mainly argued with each other but if they had of got on things may have been different, also the October manifesto was important as it contributes to the lack of unity between the unity amongst the revolutionaries as it gave them more reasons to argue and divided the parties no to mention the fact that the manifesto was one of the main reasons the tsar and his government gained control back on Russia and finally the black hundreds were an important part as if the black hundreds hadn’t of found a lot of the reformers then the reformers could of created lots more problems for Russia. However I think the main as to why the Russian revolution failed was the fact that the armed forces were loyal to the Tsar, I think this because if the army were not loyal to the tsar they could have mutinied like a few members of the army did and if the army hadn’t of been loyal to the Tsar the they wouldn’t of actually been able to stop all the riots happening and the Russian revolution may of actually been a success.
After the Russian revolution the first dumas was elected in 1906 and it contained lots of deputies who wanted a major reform (example land and the release of political prisoners) however the duma lasted only 73 days and the tsar then abolished it and stuck to the fundamental law, the tsar then created another dumas but as it contained many reforms it was replaced by a third dumas which was much more restricted. This could cause some tension as the tsar said that he would improve the Russian empire due to the consequences of the revolution but it hasn’t happened.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter 27 Review

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    7: In 1905 a revolt was caused by the loss of the Russo-Japanese war. The Tsar tried to calm the people by reforming but eventually took away rights and the reforms fell apart.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the period 1855 to 1954, opposition to Russian governments was a common occurrence due to dissatisfaction of many civilians’ lives and the lack of development seen throughout Russia. However, as much as there were some successful movements throughout 1905 such as the Bolsheviks gaining support and eventually gaining power, there were also several failed attempts due to intense use of violence, terror and censorship by the state. It is arguable that whether opposition was successful, merely came down to the strength of the opposition group or the weakness of the government in power.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The February revolution was a big turning point in Russian history; demolishing the Tsarist autocracy and breaking the Romanov dynasty that had ruled Russia for hundreds of years. Due to many factors, involved in the war or long standing issues before the war, Tsar Nicholas II was forced to abdicate to Grand Duke Michael, desperate to keep the rule of Russia in the Romanov family. Grand Duke Michael stated he did not want to rule, therefore ending the absolute monarchy. This essay will explore the main reason for the February revolution of 1917, questioning whether the war started the revolt among the Russian people or simply acted as a catalyst for a result of long standing issues and opinions dating back to the previous revolution of 1905.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia’s industrialisation as a result of the reforms of 1891 proved crucial in the fall of the old order. After Witte’s reforms of the late 1890s the population of Petrograd doubled between 1890 and 1910. With the working population in the cities it gave revolutionary groups the advantage of having a large group of frustrated workers in a confined space. In relation to the events of 1917 February revolution the population density allowed the numbers participating in the violent revolts to reach colossal numbers. With the Tsar on the war front, the masses persuaded the soldiers to join the revolutionary forces and by the time he came back, it was too late. Cities such as Petrograd and Moscow weren’t designed for the population increase, and as such workers were living in crowded dirty, overcrowded apartments. These living conditions lead to the frustrations throughout the revolutionary groups. Witte’s reforms converted a large portion of peasants into proletariat. As the tension raised in 1917 that same industrial working class responded with strikes. The strikes started by the Pulitov Steal workers on the 18th of February 1917 started out with one company, but the frustration with the Tsar wasn’t just in one factory. In exactly 12 days one strike had turned into a revolution the reason was that the reforms of Witte and Stolypin .With the peasants now in factories it ment they lacked farmers and had nobody to farm the good harvests in the war years, in fact the harvests of 1915 and 1916 were the best of the century. Without the food to feed a starving nation, the Russian government was in trouble and with this Wittes reforms that were designed…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each of the factors mentioned above were reason for the revolt that took place at the end of February in 1917, however, many of the factors were similar to the conditions and causes of the revolt in 1905 which raises the question: why was the revolution of 1917 successful? One reason is that WWI worked as a catalyst, which facilitated the success of the revolution by assisting each factor in aligning at the same time and place. WWI was not the only catalyst as the idea of liberal and free conscience was the second key which shaped the success of this particular revolt. The police, distraught and overcome with grief and guilt for their actions the day before when they were ordered to fire on innocent, peaceful masses, turned their weapons over and joined forces with the rebel forces. This forced Nicholas to call to the front to send back patriot soldiers in order to help stabilize the home front, who had not idea what was happening at home but it was too…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Huge military defeats were caused by the Russo-Japanese War, which highlighted the weakness of the military and caused humiliation across the country, therefore contributing to the outbreak of the 1905 Revolution. An example of a defeat was in January 1905 when the army had to surrender their Port Arthur naval base in Northern China, which they had possessed before the start of the war. The crushing of Russian’s military added motivation for the 1905 Revolution, as it made the people of Russia aware of the weakness of their military and ashamed to be Russian. They were losing to a nation very few had heard of and it was humiliating. However, many of the defeats to the Russian military occurred after the Revolution had started, not causing its outbreak, but merely adding to the opposition to autocratic rule by the Tsar and prolonging the Revolution.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1900 Russia was a great empire ruled by the Tsar Nicholas II. He was an autocrat, this meant there was no parliament to limit his power alongside his own secret police; the okhrana, they would censor all books and newspapers. During the period until 1916, Russia had no form of income tax. As a result the Tsar raised money to maintain his regime by taxing the produce of the peasant farmers. The burden of taxation was so great that periodic riots broke out. The okhrana couldn’t cope with the opposition of the tsar and when riots broke out, the Cossacks broke up the mobs. 85% of the population were peasants. They lived with no rights, no freedom and no land of their own until 1861, when Tsar Alexander II, abolished serfdom and allowed them to own the land on which they grew crops on. However, they had to pay redemption payments over the next forty-nine years and only when they paid all instalments would the land become their personal property. Life was hard for peasants; diseases and malnutrition were very common and so the tsarist government grew unpopular. Nicholas II’s failure to give into the demands of the people was the main reason he lost his autocracy. The peasants felt betrayed by the Tsar and wanted political change. The 1905 revolution, Bloody Sunday, was an event with grave consequences for the Tsarist regime, as the disregard for ordinary people shown by the reaction of the authorities undermined support for the state. The Tsar’s troops opened fire on demonstrators who protested to improve working conditions and fairer wages. The opposition grew to Tsarist rule but the revolution ended when the tsar promised a Duma. The Tsar’s betrayal of parliamentary democracy led to widespread…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, Russia had endured many more hardships and downfalls following the conclusion of World War I. According to The Making of the West, “the government’s incompetence and Nicholas II’s stubborn resistance to change had made the war even worse in Russia than elsewhere” (Hunt et al. 683). The. In the early revolution in February, the monarchy was overthrown and a provisional government was put into place, however it failed to meet all the desires of the working class and…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under many aspects it is arguable that the 1905 Revolution and the March 1917 Revolution in Russia were very similar. Both years found the country still struggling from a war (one bringing humiliation and the other incomprehension and outrage); both found hostility from the streets directed against perceived governmental incompetence. Yet something had changed from 1905 to 1917 for Tsarism not to be able to survive the second revolution like it did the first. The reasons are to be researched in the impact that World War 1 had on the country, the October Manifesto issued by Nicholas II on 1905, and the loyalty that the population and the Armed Forces were not willing to give the Tsar anymore.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on events in history, the main cause of the Russian Revolution was the state that the government was in and the conditions the working class was in. The Czar gave up his throne and the government began to be corrupt along with the build up of repression from the working class, who suffered for many years before, about to burst. These events set the basis for the revolution and grew with the circumstance of instability throughout the government and Dumas. Even before and after the abdication of the czar Dumas have formed and dissolved adding to the instability of the government as a whole. We see this here, “These disorders… Forced the government to promise the establishment of a consultive Duma, or assembly, elected by limited franchise.” (“Russian Revolution”) Along with this workers rioted for their working conditions and rations, soon enough the military refuse to break up the protesters and rioters involved. It now turned chaotic and violent. A peaceful protest gone bad was the influence for most of the violence because it was a weak spot to the government. The revolution caused an outcome of twelve years in suffering from a transaction of a different political standing. Negotiations came forth and at ended with Germany cutting in.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first reason for the revolution in 1905 was the developments in the Russian countryside and how they produced a general unhappiness among the landowners and even the peasants. A long-term social and economic cause was the continuing dissatisfaction of both these groups to the Emancipation reform of Alexander II in 1861. The Landowners did not approve of the act because it denied them the free labour they had access to before the emancipation of the serfs. They had lost their free labour and large amounts of their land. By 1905 many of the Landowners were facing large debts. Although the act did end serfdom in Russia, the peasants were still angry due to the redemption payments they were expected to pay and the poor quality of land they received. They also disliked the fact that they were still tied to the…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II survived the 1905 revolution because of extensive repression, political and economic reforms and Russification. These combined led to his survival because the reforms appeased some of the opposition, reducing its size, and the weak opposition, combined with extensive repression, led to the silencing of the opposition, and hence Tsar Nicholas’ survival. Furthermore, the Russification helped increase the loyalty of some of Russia’s minorities to the Tsar. Firstly, according to Leo Tolstoy, “One third of Russia is under a regime of reinforced surveillance……

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsarist Government Essay

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Different opposition groups wanted different reforms: middle class wanted more political say, freedom of speech; peasants concerned at poor harvest; national minorities sought greater self-government; SR’s, Mensheviks and Bolsheviks played little part in the event of 1905 and they looked for proletarian revolution; liberals wanted political reforms not revolution. So, as all these groups were unwilling to cooperate with each other, everyone followed only their aims. So, it was easy to deal with such uprising because it was quieter than if the oppositions were combined. In addition, it was clear that the aim of the Bloody Sunday wasn’t to overthrow the Tsarist government, people wanted Nicholas II to help them. Father Gapon led working class to the Winter Palace in order to present list of grievances. Thus, because all aims of the opposition groups were divided, they were weaker than the Russian government.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays