Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Why Did The Bolsheviks Face So Much Opposition Between 1918 And 1924

Satisfactory Essays
569 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did The Bolsheviks Face So Much Opposition Between 1918 And 1924
Why did the Bolsheviks face so much opposition between 1918 and 1924?
Summary of overall line of argument:
There were many reasons for opposition to Bolshevism, for example their attempt to destroy the bourgeoisie, War Communism, civil war, grain seizures and their attitudes towards religion. However, it is my opinion that war and its related issues were the prominent cause for opposition.
Paragraph 1: Intro
Content/Examples:
Bourgeoisie, Peasants, Civil war and War communism, Religion, Cheka – war related issues most important
Opening/Closing Sentences:
The Bolsheviks faced a great deal of opposition in their rule between 1918 and 1924.
Therefore, I am of the opinion that matters involving war were the greatest contributing factors to Bolshevik opposition.
Paragraph 2: Peasants
Content/Examples:
Grain seizures – peasants kept grain due to famine, so grain was taken and distributed to the cities and the military – formation of green armies and general resentment
Opening/Closing Sentences:
The slogan ‘Peace, Land and Bread’ was perhaps the single most important drawing factor for the peasants to the Bolshevik regime.
Thus the peasants were largely dissatisfied, but the grain hoarding only came about as a result of war communism.
Paragraph 3: Civil War and War Communism
Content/Examples:
War communism eradicates policy of peace land and bread – civil war fought to secure the revolution. War communism creates vast resentment and mass famine but sole aim is winning the war, Trotsky’s influence in the military
Opening/Closing Sentences:
War communism was a harsh policy adopted to ensure the Bolsheviks could grind out a result in the civil war.
War communism led on to many other factors that caused opposition, hence I believe it to be the single most important factor.
Paragraph 4: Bourgeoisie and Religion
Content/Examples:
Natural enemies of the regime who represented all that the Bolsheviks hated. Brutally dealt with, formed the majority of the white army.
Opening/Closing Sentences:
The bourgeoisie and the Orthodox Church were the two highest profile groups to have reason to feel threatened by the Bolshevik regime.
Whilst the two groups formed a lot of opposition, they were the natural enemies of Bolshevism, so this does not explain why the opposition was so great.
Paragraph 5: Cheka Force and Terror
Content/Examples:
Extermination of political enemies at whatever cost, essentially a repeat of the Okhrana – caused same resentment. Represented Bolshevik transition to authoritarianism
Opening/Closing Sentences:
The usage of the Cheka was another reason why so many people opposed the Bolshevik regime.
It could be argued, though, that the Cheka was only deemed necessary to help get the Bolsheviks through the Civil War, and thus it could be viewed as simply a branch of war communism.
Paragraph 6: Conclusion
Content/Examples:
War Communism main issue – grain seizures came as a result of war communism, led to resentment from those who should’ve supported Bolshevism – bourgeoisie were always going to rebel.
Opening/Closing Sentences:
In conclusion, I believe that it was the policy of War communism that caused such a great deal of opposition to the Bolshevik regime.
The fact that it disillusioned the peasantry meant that the Bolsheviks were alienating what should have been the main body of their support, so opposition was far more widespread than it should have been.
Vocabulary:
War Communism, Cheka, Whites, Reds, Greens, Bolshevik/Bolshevism, Bourgeoisie, Orthodox Church
Key Individuals:
Lenin, Trotsky
Key Events:
Grain seizures, civil war, creation of green armies, introduction of War communism

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    APUSH Summer Assignment

    • 3956 Words
    • 16 Pages

    SIG: Peasants would revolt and cause movements that go against the economic reasoning. The movements were usually to gain recognition for their work and other reasons.…

    • 3956 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this assignment I am going to compare the similarities and differences that marketing techniques described in P1 are used for the product or service chosen in Tesco and Oxfam.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chinese Communism DBQ

    • 537 Words
    • 1 Page

    back all grievances (Doc 6). The communists were also confident and excited with the peasant…

    • 537 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolsheviks acted in a brutal manner during the year 1917-1924; however this was not the main reason why they remained in power during that time frame. Instead their survival can mostly be attributed to the weakness of their opposition, who displayed a lack of organisation and unification. There were other reasons for the Bolsheviks' remaining in power between 1917 and 1924, such as the efficiency and strong leadership of the Bolsheviks, and their geographical advantages; but these were ultimately not as significant as the the weakness of their opposition, as their survival was dictated by how they exploited their enemies' flaws.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A revolution earlier on in 1917 would have been near impossible; the Bolsheviks lacked support. The party was in the minority within the Petrograd Soviet, leaving them at a political disadvantage instantly. In addition to this, the Bolsheviks gathered only 25% of the votes during the elections in March. As a result, the Bolsheviks could not even think about attempting to takeover; they lacked political support and influence.…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1917, Russia was crumbling into pieces. The World War I was draining all of Russia’s resources. There was shortage of food throughout the country, which left people starving. At the battlefront, millions of Russian soldiers were dying, they did not possess many of the powerful weapons that their opponents had. The government under Czar Nicholas II was disintegrating, and a provisional government had been set up. In November of 1917, Lenin and his communist followers known as the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and set a communist government in Russia. However, in 1924, Lenin died and Josef Stalin assumed leadership of the Soviet Union, which was the name for the communist Russia. Stalin was a ruthless leader who brought many changes to the Soviet Union. Stalin’s goal was to transform the Soviet Union into a modern superpower and spread communism throughout the world, and he was determined to sabotage anyone who stood in his way. He used many methods such as collectivization, totalitarianism and five year plan’s to achieve his goals. Stalin’s rule brought both harmful and beneficial consequences to the Soviet Union; however, the negative factors were so terrible, that they overwhelm the positive factors.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In its pure form, communism is a belief that private property should be replaced by community ownership. In the Soviet Union this idea was not easily accepted by the people. Russian leaders Vladmir Lenin and Joseph Stalin were ruthless in their elimination of those who had different ideas about Russia’s future. It is estimated that in the 1930s, Stalin was responsible for killing more than 10,000,000 Soviet people who he believe were in his way.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The title “Heroes” immediately highlights heroism as a key theme to the novel, because it is planted into the reader’s sub-conscious mind, so they identify heroism in everything they read, even if that is not the concept Cormier’s intended to present. Acting as an umbrella term, “heroes” represents the many values associated with heroism, repeated throughout the novel. Some may see it as an overbearing, forced title that Cormier uses to make heroism into the main focus, because he failed to do so in the novel. However, I believe that the plethora of themes investigated, particularly contrasts of love-hate, guilt-forgiveness, appearances-reality and fear-bravery, are brought together in “Heroes” during the search for the definition of heroism.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First Tybalt is one of the people who are responsible for the tragedy. Tybalt hated the Montagues already, and when Romeo showed up to the Capulet party, Tybalt overreacted and got angry at Romeo and that made him angry and resulted in killing Mercutio (I, i, 55-96). Lord Capulet said, don’t do anything to Romeo, but Tybalt didn’t listen because he was too angry for Romeo even being at the Capulet party. Also If he had just little kindness in his heart, Mercutio and Tybalt would’ve lived and Romeo wouldn’t be banished (III, i, 112-128). This resulted it in Romeo’s banishment, and in the end, his death, along with Juliet. Romeo’s banishment led to Friar Lawrence’s plan and Friar Lawrence is also responsible for their death from his own Plan…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eight Steps of Genocide

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages

    * Such was also the case with the strong resistance of the Ukrainian farmer to Stalin’s program of collectivization in 1931-32 coupled with the threat of Ukrainian nationalism to communist control. Thus, when what would have been a mild famine hit the region in 1932, Stalin magnified the famine many fold by seizing food and its sources (livestock, pets, seed grain, shooting birds in the trees, etc.) and boycotting the import of food taken away from them before they entered the Soviet Republic. About 5 million Ukrainians were starved to death.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The peasants and working class citizens of Russia in 1900 were not pleased with their living or working conditions. The also constituted for roughly 77% of Russia’s overall population. Those who worker in the agricultural industry doing tasks such as farming faced numerous hardships. The working days were long and arduous, there was little time for rest and near no time for pleasure. The work was tiring and caused exhaustion however the peasants were forced to endure and make do. Any money they did make was spent on taxes and paying their respective debts or landowners.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolshevik Takeover

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In March of 1917 in Russia, The Tsar, Nicholas II had little choice. The Great War (as it was known as at that time) had turned into a disaster, conditions at home were horrible, and the Menshevik government had forced Nicholas to abdicate He did this for himself and his son and gave the power to his brother. His brother gave up the power the next day because the country was in such disarray. After that, the Provisional Government took power. By November of 1917 in Russia, the Provisional Government was in complete collapse. In the meantime, the Bolshevik party, which was helped by German money, had built up an efficient party organisation, had a brilliant propaganda machine, and a powerful private army know as the Red Guards.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social History

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Social historians who intend to focus on understanding the root causes and motivations for the revolutions of 1917, look towards the actions and behaviour of normal, everyday people involved within the Revolution rather than the influence of great men and women, or the policies of a state. Social historians observe and comment on the fact that leading up to 1917, there was a widening and very apparent gap between the richest members of Russia society and the very poorest members. Rather than being typecast as the ignorant and stupid masses, many Russians from all different walks of life whether they were soldiers, peasants, factory workers, or homemakers developed their own consciousness and opinions as to what that the revolution meant for Russia, how they should function in a new society, how that society should be structured, and what it should look like. In contrast to what Bolshevik propaganda would have some of us believe, many Russians did not blindly follow or believe in demagogues like Trotsky or Lenin who were promising bread, circuses, and miracles for the suffering population. Instead, many developed their own opinions on what kind of regime should take power and represent Russia and what type of laws should govern the land. Due to the fact that the vast swarm of Russian society was what would be considered lower-class, the message of the Bolsheviks for a government and party to represent the lower-class was simply much more appealing than other parties at the time such as the liberals or the conservative factions in the government. Peace by the means of an end to the Russian involvement in the First World War, bread for the starving masses in the cities, and land to those who were disappointed by the lack of agricultural reform since the emancipation of 1861 were all promises that were much more appealing than the message of the provincial government. The…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays