Preview

Why did the Russian Provisional Government fail?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
717 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why did the Russian Provisional Government fail?
Alex Neumann
Grade 11 March 2014
History Essay

The Russian Provisional Government was formed in the aftermath of the abdication of the Tsar in February 1917. By this time, Russia was less advanced than the rest of Europe is all social, political and economic aspects. There was little infrastructure and industry. The Provisional Government failed to meet the expectations of the workers and peasants, and did not function efficiently. Because of the weaknesses, Lenin and the Bolsheviks were able to overthrow them easily in October later that year.

The Provisional Government did not have the support of the masses. They had not been elected and were comprised of intelligentsia and the middle class. They made some liberal reforms, such as freedom of speech, press and religion as well as returning exiled revolutionary leaders. The middle class themselves only really wanted a say in the government, and once they had that, they did not do much else. They did not redistribute any land or address the issues of wages and unemployment with urban workers. There was continued social unrest and support for the Provisional Government decreased.

The decision of the Provisional Government to not end the country’s involvement with World War One was one of its major downfalls. The war had devastated the country; all money was going to the war front and there were massive shortages of food supplies and fuel. The majority of the soldiers were peasants, whose problems were only further exacerbated. Due to the government’s preoccupation with the war, almost all social and economic problems were overlooked or ignored. These problems made the people angry and dislike the government, further reducing their support.

In April, Lenin, leader of the Bolsheviks returned from exile wanting a revolutions and exploited the weaknesses of the Provisional Government to gain popularity. His tactic was absolutely no support of the new government, primarily because of they were continuing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Double Language Analysis

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Recent shark attacks in Western Australia has raised controversy about how to solve the issue. “Stem the carnage” is a letter to the editor written by Sam Forsythe appeared on the 18th April 2007, Forsythe argues that the only solution is to kill the man-eating monsters with a genuinely concerned tone. In response to “stem the carnage”, James Whitt wrote a letter, in a somewhat condescending tone, contending that killing the sharks is a ridiculous suggestion to the issue.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the repressive policies of the Tsar was partly responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule as the Tsar made it very difficult for there to be any sort of opposition. This was because the Tsar implemented the Okraha (secret police) to exile anyone who opposed him. This created fear in opposition groups so they started operated from outside Russia. In addition to this, the Statute of State Security meant that the government opponents were tried so could not operate. This, with the help of Okhrana barred any opposition.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians may believe the Provisional Government was doomed because of a major problem with the provisional government which was the Dual Authority. The Provisional Government was made up of members of the old Duma that had refused to disband at the Tsars command. This meant that they were basically the same men that the Tsar had appointed before the revolution, so nothing had changed in that regard. Consequently, they had no goodwill from the public backing them up, so they would be judged purely on what the public could see happening. Furthermore, the Government had to share power with the Petrograd Soviet. This illegitimate relationship lessened the power of the Provisional Government existentially. Incidentally, it should be mentioned that the two factions were not necessarily hostile towards one another from the start, with some members being members of both groups at the same time. This combination of convenience however, could not last for long.Without a shred of a doubt, one of the biggest problems with the Provisional Government was the continuation of the war. The war was a lost cause by this stage and the Provisional Government would have wanted to pull out if it were a logical possibility, but in order to keep Russia afloat they needed to keep up the fight for the money that they were receiving from Britain and France. The loans that Russia had taken out from these countries while under the Tsarist regime had left Russia financially destroyed. The injections of money and supplies that the allies were providing Russia with because of their involvement in the war was the only thing keeping Russia stable. If Russia could have started to engage in peace talks, as suggested by Josef Stalin, then the Provisional Government could concentrate on sorting out the social and economic problems properly, but because of the desperate need for the war credits, this was not a viable solution. The effect of this choice to keep fighting is somewhat akin to watching a…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reforms and policies made during the last Tsarist years were not in the interests of the people but were made simply to maintain the power of the Tsar and his nobles. Most people would argue that during the years 1917-1964 there was more political freedom and less repression than in the Tsarist years. The provisional government did not meet the needs of the Russian people. They were an unstable and temporary government, and many people on the furthest parts of the Russian empire did not know about their existence. This provided them with many issues, such as trying to enforce democracy onto people they did not understand what democracy actually was. Many historians believe that at this point the people of Russia did not know themselves what form of government they wanted and due to the lack of education they did not know what form was best for them. In October 1917 came the Bolshevik revolutions. With their leader, Lenin, the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and came into power. The leadership of Lenin was met with great approval from the people. Lenin promised political freedom unknown to them under the Tsars and Provisional government. In his rule…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The government was an autocracy which meant that all power resided in the hands of the Tsar. Nicholas II, however, had a weak and stubborn personality. He was not willing to share his authority with the Duma (parliament) and his government relied on oppression to remain in power. The army and Okhrana (secret police) were used to stamp out protests. A further key feature was that the government was dependent on a narrow social base of aristocratic supporters, which left it vulnerable to opposition from the vast majority of Russians. During the war years the growing scale of strikes and demonstrations was becoming too difficult for the government to handle.The war caused huge casualties (9 out of 15 million soldiers) for very little gain and a series of defeats in battle led to a collapse in morale. Consequently, the Tsar was blamed for failure because he had taken command of the army in 1915. As a result the Tsar was absent from the capital and he left his wife in charge. The Tsarina was distrusted because of her German origins and she was under the corrupt influence of Rasputin, who had the power to appoint and dismiss ministers at will. This led to a major loss of confidence in the government.…

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the October Coup in 1917, the Bolshevik’s power as the government of Russia was not completely solidified. This was mainly due to the vast opposition that the Bolsheviks experienced from all over Russia along with other pressing issues such as food shortages, an exhausting war, and a crippled economy. Yet the Bolsheviks not only survived the early day‘s of empowerment but went on to rule Russia for the next 70 years. This essay will examine the factors that allowed the Bolsheviks to have such a sweeping success in ruling Russia.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A major factor which led to the downfall of the provisional government was First World War. Russia had already lost territory in Poland and morale; this was predominantly down to low members within the army. Additionally Russia owed large amounts of money in foreign loans, and the British and French agreed to continue lending money as long as Russia continued fighting therefore also influencing the provisional government to continue with war. The agreement for Russia to continue fighting in the war brought the provisional government into conflict/disagreement with the Soviet for they believed the only way to bring Russia out of depression was to remove itself form the war. This meant that they would not support the continuation of the war for any other reason, for instance gaining land or money from their defeated opponents. This led the provisional government to plan an offensive on the Eastern Front in order to win support from home and abroad. The June offensive was introduced and made against the Austro-Hungarian army, the failure of the June offensive lead to mass numbers of Russian troops deserting from the front. This was a major collapse for the authority of the provisional government and resulted to July days which led to a series of riots and demonstrations in Petrograd (St…

    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though there are many advantage there are also many disadvantages. The biggest disadvantage is that when you take a plea bargain it is an automatic admission of guilt. You waive your right to have your trial heard by a jury and a judge. And, even though a plea bargain was offered and accepted, the court can decline the plea bargain which would put the case back on the docket to be heard by a jury. So an admission of guilt not only stays with you forever, it also takes away the right to file for an appeal in your…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, the Bolsheviks had no figure of leadership in Russia – Lenin had been exiled to Switzerland. Consequently, until Lenin’s return in April, the Bolsheviks were left to decide what the best decisions to make for the party were; they began to support the Provisional Government, believing the Marxist’s plan of achieving a Socialist community was being fulfilled. However, when Lenin returned to Russia, April 3rd 1917, he degraded the Provisional Government and the idea of supporting them, insisting that all power goes towards the Soviet. Lenin’s sudden change in Bolshevik ideals unsettled the party and it took time to resolve the drastic change. This move made the Bolsheviks legitimacy questionable due to the abrupt change in Bolshevik ideals.…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolsheviks consolidated their power after October 1917 however they faced many severe problems which made keeping their power complex. For Lenin and the Bolsheviks winning political power was relatively easy compared with retaining it. The Bolsheviks may have had a temporary majority in the All-Russia soviet in October 1917, but they did not have a majority following in the country as a whole . Russia was in chaos, politically and economically, and normal government had broken down in large areas. . yet lenin was able to overcome these problems and hold ontopower to create the world first communist state. The Bolsheviks overcame these problems by use of violence in the form of repression, and violence in war communism and the red army during the civil war however violence against their opponents was not their only strategy, Lenin also put forward policies of reform which showed that they were willing to compromise their principles to keep hold of power when faced with early problems and after the outbreak of the civil war the disunity of the opposition and the geographical and organisational factors were key factors which helped the Bolsheviks consolidate their grip on power.…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first of these was headed by a moderate liberal, Georgi Lvov and the second was ran by Alexander Krensky. The Provisional Government knew that the Bolsheviks were going to strike. The reports of the Bolshevik's conspiracy in where always in Krensky's mind, but there was overwhelming dissent about the revolution. The government was so unstable that Krensky had little to no control over the congress or military, and because Krensky did not have "the majesty of government, the laws, the protection of friends and of the state," he had no power, no control over his fortune. Krensky's failure as a prince had to do with the unstable government and the political factions all brewing their revolutions and civil unrest. He did not prepare for fortune. He met his end by not being able to deal with…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin was important to the Bolshevik seizure of power as he was able to manipulate public opinion using slogans and propaganda. This was also shown early in the year, before Lenin's return to Russia from Switzerland. The Bolsheviks in Russia had printed in 'Pravda' (their newspaper) that their members and followers should support the Provisional Government, and also that they had given serious thought to the idea of combining with the Mensheviks. This was all very contrary to what Lenin wrote in his 'April Theses' which clearly laid out his views and beliefs on the subject. A key point of his 'April Theses' was "No Support for the Provisional Government", yet without him his party were proposing just that. Lenin as an individual was able to force the Bolsheviks to follow his beliefs and goals and without him they may never have chosen this course of action at all. Through his April thesis, particularly the slogans “Peace, Bread, Land” and “All Power to the Soviets”, he was able to harness the support of the Russian people.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the abdication of the Tsar, it was decided that the Russian people should democratically elect a new Constituent Assembly. Until an election could be organised, the Provisional Government, made up partly of ex-Duma members, was placed in control of Russia.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolshevik Takeover

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fall of the Provisional government and the Bolshevik Revolution sparked many changes for Russia in 1917. It changed Russia for always. The economic system changed from a capitalist system to a socialist economy, peasants were granted the land that they already took in the February/March revolution and it ended the war and made peace in Russia. The lead up to the revolution can be traced back as far as March during the February/March revolution of 1917.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To a certain extent the weaknesses of the provisional were responsible for the October revolution. The provisional government were incredibly weak as an institution of ruling. They failed to supress opposition, for example it ignored the existence of the Smolny Institute which became a hotbed of radical ideas. The fact that they were unable to supress the opposition made the government look extremely weak and caused huge resentment towards them. This made the people of Russia desire strong leadership and therefore when the October revolution was about to take place, the people of Russia did not object. They also failed to suppress any opposition when the Petrograd Soviet Order number 1 was issued on the 1st March. This meant that the soldiers and workers were forbidden to obey direct orders from the provisional government unless the soviet agreed. So the government effectively had no power to enforce anything unless the soviet agreed, by the government not responding to this and taking no action shows a huge weakness and shows to the public how they can be easily lead, controlled and walked over, they had no strength or authority. Another main weakness of the provisional government was that it lacked legitimacy. Due to the fact that the provisional government was just a temporary group, the country lacked stability. This gave the Bolsheviks the opportunity to overthrow the government as to the outside world they were only seen as temporary as it was. The provisional government made a huge mistake…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays