college athletes has been a hot topic in the sports world. While college athletes are…
Whether college athletes should get paid to play college sports is still to be determined. Some people say that college athletes should get paid because everybody else such as the coaches, the NCAA, and the college are all getting paid. Also some people say they shouldn’t get paid because the students didn’t go to college to get paid they went to get a degree. The pros of paying college athletes is college athletes would be able to provide for their family, and they would be able to pay for hospital cost just in case of a serious injury. The cons of paying college athletes is some students that play sports for their colleges will think that they…
Megan Greenwell in her article expresses her opinion on the following topic and gives some arguments in favor of having collegiate sports. In this article she is arguing about the connection between the grades various students are receiving and their involvement in collegiate sports events (football in this case). Her opinion on this kind of connection is clear and straightforward. She is describes the arguments for and against collegiate sports as “paternalistic and shortsighted.” The author is arguing with declaration given by a trio of economists which examine the relationship between a university’s success on the football…
Some colleges make more money than others. This graph shows the schools with the most profit in their sports programs. Somebody could say that the athletes bring in an enormous amount of money. According to Jeff Dorfman, a professor of Economics at the University of Georgia, only a few collegiate sports actually bring in money. Therefore, an athlete in a sport that isn’t very profitable wouldn’t make nearly get as much as an athlete in a very profitable sport. Along with the sports being very profitable they also have to pay for an even larger variety of different things. Student athletes should not be paid because of the money that would be paid to them. The money that they would be paid could be used to advance other things in the university such as better libraries, science labs, fixing up the dorms, or even improving their athletic facilities. Although the athletes put a lot of time into their schooling and sports the benefits they are given is equal to what they are giving and being…
Why should kids be paid for doing a professionals job? The debate on whether or not to pay college athletes is a debate that has been argued for quite some time. Due to the lack of positive results, and a surplus of negatives, this should not take place. There is no way to muster up a fair system to pay the athletes while keeping everyone happy. Also, paying players will distract them from their academics due to them knowing that they can make money playing sports. Lastly, the athletes already have an opportunity for money with scholarships. Therefore, in order to keep college athletes happy and focused on school while still giving them an opportunity to receive scholarships, the students should not be paid for their athletic performances.…
We often look at college athletes as miniature stars. The question is, why should student’s athlete get a paycheck for playing amateur level sports? Athletes complain about how they do not get enough for playing a sport. They are forgetting that they are being rewarded with a half or full scholarship. The main goal for these athletes is being academically successful. Not who has the best jump shot or who fumbled a ball, that does not matter. The essence of playing college level has been taken out of place, now replaced with the mindsets of professional athletes. Did they forget? You are not professionals. The love of the game has been through extortion for the love of money. Paying college athletes will lead the students astray from what they attended the institution to accomplish in the first place, that is, to earn a degree, not to gain a compensation.…
Recently in the news, there was a report on the five University of Kentucky basketball players that decided to enter the NBA draft after only their freshmen season. Sure, they were told of the millions of dollars they could make in professional sports, but were they given the odds of them even reaching that big payday? From picks 5-10 in the draft, the success rate of the player becoming a league average starter is about 30%, then for the rest of the first round, picks 11-30 have around a 10% chance (Thread:15 year Basketball Analysis). But even after given the odds, most of the players will choose to enter the draft because if they continue to play and attend college, they could hurt themselves and lose out on all the money. But what happens when the athlete doesn’t make it? Then he becomes just another person in his early 20s without a college degree, looking for a job. But what if colleges were to offer the players an added incentive to stay, promise a type of salary so the athlete could make some extra money to help with his tuition cost, maintain a social life, and stay in school to finish his degree? Because even on a full scholarship, it does not cover the entire cost, the IRS taxes the scholarship leaving the player about $3,200-$3,500 short a year. This is why paying college athletes makes sense, because it will help keep young adults in school to finish their degrees and help them financially to achieve a better future. College athletes deserve to be paid because sports take up about 40 hours a week, which could translate to a full time job. So why should the players not get paid for doing his job? That is the question that is keeping most student-athletes from completing their education and chancing not only professional sports, but their futures as well.…
A possible negative effect of paying collegiate athletes would be a decrease in competition. People believe college athletes should get paid as if it were a job, although this will create issues between rich and poor schools (Griffin 18). The rich colleges will have the opportunity to obtain the best athletes, causing the poor schools to not be as competitive. This issue makes the sports less competitive and entertaining, making fans less interested (Griffin 18). Since football and basketball bring in the most money, other college sports will not be able to be funded due to drawing in number one players to play football and basketball (Griffin 18). Most popular sports are men’s sports, therefore creating less…
The term student-athlete was created in 1964 by Walter Byers. He was the first executive president of the NCAA. He coined this term to enable his organization to counter attempts to require universities to pay workers' compensation. In layman terms, make money from extraordinary athletes and offer them a free education. Many student athletes have stated that a free education isn't enough to get by and they need compensation. The NCAA believes a free education is enough for Student athletes. There has been a long disparity among college student athletes, claiming they do not have sufficient funds for everyday necessities. The NCAA states that compensation is in place through scholarships, but this is not enough and it needs to be supplemented with payments in different ways such as endorsements etc... to college athletes, opponents to this proposition claim it would ruin amateurism and other factors. Both Sides of this topic make good points of their argument there hasn't been many…
College football should think about the rules of the NCAA another way. The NFL makes football players wait three years after graduating high school before entering the draft (Bayless). With such a tight hold on players from the NCAA, means no income for players in that time frame. Outside of room, board, and tuition players should be able to receive payment of some sort. Scholarships looks really great to the outside eye, but scholarships in the market today isn’t worth the same as it was in past decades.…
Professional athletes get paid to perform the game they love. The millions they make preforming can lead to millions they make in endorsements. So why can’t college athletes sign an endorsement deal if their not getting paid? This has many positive and negative views on it.…
As recorded by “Pay or Scholarship” by Teengagement they state “Ultimately, sports isn’t just about a love of the game, even in college. It’s about business too.” This implies that most college athletes do not play sports just for having a good time, but to start their life. This also means that a college athlete may love the sport they play, however it is also about their future in that sport. Overall, playing sports isn’t only about the game but the overall building of a person, preparing them for the real world after college.…
All of us have had some kind of emotional feeling after winning a big game. Nothing can ruin the joy and excitement, especially if you came up with the winning play. In this moment nothing matters but the win. No thoughts of money or revenue runs through your mind. “About two percent of high school athletes are awarded athletic scholarships to compete in college” (NCAA.com). It is a privilege to get the opportunity to play at the college level, let alone be awarded an athletic scholarship. This opportunity should not be taken for granted. To play at the collegiate level is something all athletes dream of and for most; it is the highest level of competition. College athletics are based on heart, drive, and passion to succeed in the sport and in life. Even after college, athletic programs teach many life lessons that will essentially makes you become a better person with strong character. Being an athlete myself, I feel like student- athletes should be paid based on their hard work and time.…
College players need to get paid for what they do. When college players do not get paid, they do not get paid for the great things that they do on national TV. College players make more money for school playing their sport than people's salaries. Did you know that just if you make it to the NCAA BCS game, you get at least six million dollars. That's not even if you win. Sure student athletes get free things like free tuition, board, room fees, and food, but paying players would give them money for things like laundry, late night snacks, food for restaurants when on the road, and just different things. The three reasons why student athletes should get paid is because playing a college sport is like having a job, college players make money for…
Others might say that college athletes shouldn’t be paid because scholarships cover everything for school. Although, the scholarships often forget to cover everything. They cover most, but often do not fully cover meal plans, which can leave even a full-scholarship athlete in a mountain of debt. They might also say that not paying college athletes is the proper thing to do because it isn’t like they are on a professional sports team. I would say otherwise. College sport are not technically considered ‘professional’, but they should be. Awesome players, working together on an awesome team, against other awesome players, working together on another awesome team. Combine that with the fact that their sports are on TV, and it sounds professional to me, and probably to a lot of other people…