Preview

Why Do Gun Control Laws Stop Gun Violence

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
290 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Do Gun Control Laws Stop Gun Violence
I believe gun control laws do not stop gun violence because of the killing population. If the gun control laws stop the violence the death crime wouldn’t be so high. Criminals don't seem to care about the laws. Criminals continue to carry guns looking for trouble.
Gun control laws doesn’t seem to affect criminals. Some criminals even feel as regardless of what, they are going to do what they want to do. I believe if the gun control laws were strict and had more consequences behind it the crimes may drop. If gun controls stop gun violence a lot of our love ones will still be here. Gun violence have gotten out of control.
We have some criminals that don’t think twice about taking another person life. Some criminals feel they don’t have to obey


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When we look at gun-related events, such as a school shooting, or a massacre, our first knee-jerk reaction is to immediately blame guns for the crime. Stricter laws will surely stop those law-breaking criminals, right? As if the time of the writing of the article from procon.org, 49 out of the 62 mass shootings were done with legal guns. At least, that's one less crime committed, right? Would leaving ourselves defenseless while criminals acquire guns illegally instead be a better method protection? My partner and I believe that stricter gun control laws should not be passed, due to the fact that the Constitution protects the right to own guns, criminals who commit crimes with guns would likely not mind breaking another law to acquire said gun,…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If there were stricter gun laws would violent crimes go down? Gun laws have a direct effect on the rate of violence. I believe that violence in general would go down if guns laws were more strict. For instance, loose guns laws have produced mass shootings.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why do most of 19 different major varieties of gun control laws appear to have no impact, with a few exceptions, on the types of violence which frequently involve guns? Many explanations are suggested by both our own results and those of prior research. First, some gun laws are intended to have their effects by reducing gun ownership levels, so some gun laws may fail because they do not achieve their proximate goal of reducing gun ownership (Table IVA). However, our results also generally indicate that gun prevalence levels do not have a net positive effect on violence rates (top row, Table IVB). Consequently, gun laws may fail simply because, even if they did reduce gun prevalence, this would not produce a reduction in violence rates.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun control wont affect murder rates. study's have shown if they ban guns or get stricter gun control laws they will use other weapons to substitute guns. Russia, for example has extremely tight gun control laws. Its murder rate is still quite high in fact its twice as high as our gun ridden United states. So there for banning guns wont get rid of murder. A study revealed that most of the European countries such as Norway, France, Germany, and Finland has significantly lower murder rates. Compare that to Luxembourg where handguns are totally banned and any type of gun is minimal has a murder rate nine time higher than Germany.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hawaii has the lowest gun death rate in the nation. Statistics from 2013 reveal that states with gun violence laws that aren’t robust with higher rates of gun ownership possess the highest overall gun death rate in the nation. Simultaneously, states with the lowest overall gun death rates have lower rates on gun ownership and strong gun violence prevention laws. It is vital that states adopt stricter gun violence laws because they will decrease fatalities, reduce school shootings, and prevent accidents.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control can be looked at from many different viewpoints from many different people. Some people believe that all crime will be stopped while others think it will only increase. Guns should not be banned in the U.S because banning them will not make the killers stop, good people need to help, and making guns illegal will just lead to people disobeying the law.…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, when have criminals been a type of people to abide by the law; by definition a criminal is one who will break the law. Statistics support this assertion, 37.4% of prison inmates who used, carried, or possessed a firearm when they committed the crime for which they were serving their prison sentence obtained the gun from a family member or friend (Planty, Truman 2013). Furthermore, to advocate for gun control is also to advocate removing firearms from law abiding civilians, who could need weapons for self-defense, which happens about 2.5 Million times a year (NRA, 2014). Likewise, a survey of convicted felons found that 48% admitted that they avoided committing crimes when they knew the victim was armed (Write, Rossi, 1985). This evidence further supports the view-point that criminals are less likely to endanger themselves when committing crimes, therefore, citizens should be armed. Policies should not remove the most basic right to self protection in dire…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Gun control laws can open up a whole other side to the distribution of illegal items. For example, when some types of guns are banned or possibly all types it is going to strengthen a market for criminals to make money and become more powerful. One way criminals can undermine gun control laws is to start make their own weapons and sell them to the public. Gun control laws only benefit non law abiding citizens because it would not be the first time they committed crimes to make money. No matter what kind of restriction is in place people will always find a way to get what they want.…

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we enacted more gun control laws then there wouldn't be as much problems. Gun shootings are the main reason why the kill rate is going up. That being the main cause is just something we need to stop. Gun laws are causes of violent crime in the world and it must need to be changed for people to buy guns easier to protect themselves.Gun control will help everyone in the world because it would make the world way safer.If there were more gun control laws enacted the world would be a safer place because more gun control laws would reduce gun deaths. Guns are rarely used in self defense and The presence of a gun makes a conflict more likely to become violent.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The debate over people being allowed to carry guns has been going on for a long time. The real debate should be whether or not these laws are really reducing or increasing violent crimes in America today. According to the website, Gunowners.org, an individual can purchase any firearm from a federal, firearms licensee (FFL) in another state by going to his place of business(Gun). The right to keep and bear arms is addressed in the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Federal gun laws are enforced by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). They have done a really good job in the past. In my opinion, these gun laws aren’t reducing…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control only takes guns away from people that are law abiding citizens. It doesn’t stop criminals from buying guns. Law abiding citizens will most likely follow the laws and there aren’t many troubles with them but your criminals most likely to be the ones that buy guns illegally and will not follow the laws in order to register their guns. I think there is a misconception of the term gun control. Gun Control is supposed to be the government regulation of possessing and using firearms by private citizens. Instead the government is using it as a way to take the right of the people of the United States right to bear arms away.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prohibition never stopped the production and transportation of alcohol, it just made it a challenge and that's pretty much what gun control is doing for the criminals. Even in gun free zones like Virginia tech guns still show up here and there. Criminals don't have to use guns to commit murder, they can use a knife or a grenade or nuclear weapons but the government is only looking at guns because they are used the most often because they make it easier to commit a murder or a robbery. Some people think that if more people in the world had guns there would be less violence because the criminals would be scared to mess with someone because they don't know who has a gun that they will use against them and who doesn't have a…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control is a very controversial issue. I firmly believe that the circulation of guns should be controlled. I do not think that guns are being controlled and I think that they should be controlled in a more fashionable manner. But I also believe Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent. Taking guns away from violent people will not make them less violent. It might make them more violent. Violent people can use anything to be violent. Taking guns away from violent people is no more than just taking one out of a thousand more ways to hurt, rob, or kill you.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem being crimes committed using fire arms. What the Government fails to recognize is that criminals do not abide by the laws, taking weapons away from law abiding citizen will only give the criminals more means to do harm. There is a law against braking and entering but criminals still do it. There is a Law against stealing, yet criminals still continue to steal. So what will taking guns away from Law abiding citizens do? Absolutely nothing other than make citizens more vulnerable to the criminals. While a study was found between 1980 and 2009, shows the States with restrictions on carrying concealed fire arms had higher gun-related murders(ProCon #2). This will also be the first and only Law that amplifies the problem rather than helping. If criminals want to have guns they will find a way to get them. Taking away legally owned guns does not get rid of the illegally owned guns. The Gun Control Law will give criminals the upper hand, they will be more likely to shoot innocent people to get why they want, expectably know there will not be bullet fired back at them. The reason Gun control has not affect on murders is because the killing is not being done people with legally owned…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Ownership

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gun control can even raise the crime on citizens. Gun control may be able to regulate the wrong use of these weapons, but it also causes those responsible to not be able to have guns when needed to protect themselves. The truth of the matter is people if wanted enough can get weapons against the law to use against innocent people trying to go about their business. People have been killed…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays