References: Hindson, Ed. & Yates, Gary. The Essence of the Old Testament: A Survey. 2012. B&H Publishing Group. Nashville, Tennessee.…
The first section of the book is titled comparative studies. This section is comprised of the first two chapters. Chapter one is aptly named history and methods. Chapter two has been dubbed comparative studies, scholarship, and theology. This section covers the growing division between scholars of a secular nature and scholars of a religious nature. The purpose of this part of the book is to defend the Bible from the damage done by comparative studies which twisted evidence to work against the historicity, canonicity, and divine revelation of Gods’ Word, the Bible.…
Oswalt also brings up that his book will address the ever-increasing amount of skepticism found within today’s society, when it comes to people believing in the validity of the historical facts found in the Bible. It is the classic example of what the Bible refers to of mankind getting “wiser but weaker.” Oswalt argues that even though biblical narratives might not conform exactly to modern history writing, they are still the closest thing that is on record that can give an account to what took place in the ancient world. He basically summarizes the entire literary work by stating, “I am arguing that the Bible will not allow us to disassociate its historical claims from its theological claims, and that our investigations of the history should not assume that they can be disassociated.”2 Basically, Oswalt feels as if the Bible should be given its due credit for the amount of historical claims that have been proven to be accurate.…
the author and Old Testament scholar John W. Oswalt begins with an introduction in which he presents the argument for the book. In this book, it is divided into two main sections: The Bible and Myth and The Bible and History. However, Oswalt puts emphases on myth and history. Oswalt addresses the Bible and myth, the Bible and history, the Old Testament, and the Ancient Near Eastern (ANE) myth all in ten chapters. However, revelation, myth, and history are the main topics of this book. Oswalt further discusses the differences between Scripture and myth; as well as the issues involved in the Bible’s relationship to history and historiography. Oswalt argues that while there are undoubtedly many surface comparisons among the Old Testament and…
Cited: Coogan, Michael David., Marc Zvi. Brettler, Carol A. Newsom, and Pheme Perkins. The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books. New York: Oxford UP, 2001. Print.…
Beale, G. K., and D. A. Carson. Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, Mich., Nottingham, England: Baker Academic, 2007.…
Schmidtbleicher, Paul R. “Balancing The Use Of The Old Testament.” Chafer Theological Seminary Journal 3, no. Jul (2002): 40–62.…
The first half of the book, “The Bible and Myth,” Oswalt takes the time to define what a myth is and what differentiates the Bible from a myth. The first chapter deals with the Bible in the framework of its backgrounds and its influence to humanity at large. The second half of the book, “The Bible and History,” look at several philosophical thoughts proposed by others that attempt to explain the Bible’s importance separate from historical authority.…
The process by which Scripture has been preserved and compiled is one whose history is worth noting. The early church had many opportunities to share the Good News of Christ via word of mouth, but from the time of Christ’s resurrection until the mid-second century, there had not been a single culmination of writings considered to be essential for the purposes of teaching and spreading the Gospel. Increasing heretical opposition in conjunction with the need for a standard of living to follow gave rise to the formation of the New Testament Canon; however, this would not come without multiple false teachers and many arguments over what would classify as “inspired by God”. To seek the answer to one of history’s most important questions, we must understand what the canon is, how it was inspired and to whom authority was given in determining what would be included in such Holy Scriptures.…
I believe that Worldview is seriously influenced by culture, knowledge, politics, religion and upbringing. Therefore, it is not uncommon to meet people who view the Bible as mythical literature. Hence there have been occasions when I have found myself in an intense debate about whether or not information in the Bible is real. As a result, there have been occasions…
He points out how the modern-day scholars are now comparing the Bible to other religious documents and considering it as just another mythical belief. Oswalt credits this world-view change to a study of similarities between the Bible and like Near Eastern writings rather than before when perhaps more interest was placed on viewing the differences. These studies are explained in the first half of this publication and sub-titled The Bible and Myth.…
[3] Smith, Sam A. (2005) “Important Truths About the Bible, Part 2: How and Where Did We Get Our Bible?” The Biblical Reader Retrieved 1 February 2011 from http:biblicalreader.com/reader/How_and_Where_Did_We_Get_Our_Bible.htm…
According to Bloomberg (2009), Form Criticism separates the Bible text into categories based on function, “…the Gospels could be subdivided into discrete “pericopae” (self- contained passages) and analyzed according to the form (almost a “mini-genre) of each” (p.92). For example, some forms include parables, proverbs, and prophetic declarations (Bloomberg, 2009, p.92). Because form criticism uses a skeptical framework to interpret Biblical texts, form critics deconstruct or reduce Bible passages until the historical value or historical Jesus becomes evident. In other words, form critics challenged the credibility of the Bible based on the belief that most stories were passed on through oral tradition, embellished, and borrowed storytelling devices or frameworks from other countries like Europe or Africa. However, the Apostle Paul says, “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness…” (2 Tim.3:16, NIV).…
The first 39 books of the larger work called the Bible, is called the Old Testament. The Bible itself is arguably the best selling and most read book of all time, yet it’s well known to be quite challenging to read through and understand. The Old Testament portion of the Bible, notably the most difficult portion of the Bible for most to study and follow, yields 39 books from multiple authors, and spans over 4000 years of crucial world and church history. If that were not enough to take on, the Old Testament comes our way through multiple styles of authorship and formats, including but not limited to, books of history, law, proverbs, ethics, philosophy, treatises, dramas, songs, epics, biographies, and letters. There have been many books written and published to survey, explain, and/or bring to light the Old Testament, but none more helpful to me than the review subject of this paper, the work of Dr. Elmer L. Towns, entitled “A Journey Through the Old Testament”.…
The chapter ‘The Bible as Book and as Library’ gives an understanding of the Bible, where it originated from and the many different forms it takes under the various religions. The chapter answers all the various questions one may ask when studying the Bible by looking at the Bible at an academic perspective but also a faith perspective. Many religions Many Religions have sacred texts but only Judaism and Christianity refer to theirs as ‘The Bible’.…