Preview

Why Do States Decide To Redraw Their Congressional Districts

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1326 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Do States Decide To Redraw Their Congressional Districts
Every ten years, the congressional districts in each state are redrawn based on the updated U.S. census in a process known as redistricting (Miller et al. 2013 XIII). After each census, states lose or gain congressional delegates based on the change in population within that particular state. Redistricting, which is most likely the result of the Great Compromise of 1787, puts the re-apportioning of congressional districts in the hands of state legislatures (Miller et al. 2013 x). In most states, the political party in control of the state legislature has complete control over the redrawing of districts, with the exception of a few states like California and Arizona, who use independent commissions. Regardless of how the state chooses to redraw their congressional districts, they usually follow a few unwritten and written rules. …show more content…
As stated in the United States Constitution, the largest amount of variance between each district’s population can be ten-percent (Miller et al. 2013 XIII). In addition to equal populations in each district, nearly every state requires the districts to be contiguous, with some even mandating that the districts be drawn in a compact manner (Miller et al. 2013 XIV-XV). The issue over what is considered compact has long been debated with concerns over racial and political inequality being called into question by constituents. The issue many people have is not with the idea of redistricting, but how it is used by political parties to maintain or a gain an advantage in Congress, a process known as gerrymandering (Stern 2017 par. 1). The main purpose of gerrymandering is to maintain a delegate advantage, without having a majority advantage within the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before the 2010 census, Missouri had 9 representatives in the United States House of Representatives. After the census, Missouri lost a representative and now only has 8 representatives in the United States House of Representatives. This process of altering the number of representatives in a state after a census is known as reapportionment. As a result of this change in representation, Missouri also redrew its districts. The process of redrawing districts due to a census is known as redistricting. Unfortunately, this can lead to gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the process of using redistricting for the purpose of obtaining a partisan or factional advantage.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering is a practice used when electoral districts are being set and are used to create a political advantage for specific group or party by manipulating district boundaries. For example, if one state was more likely to vote Republican you could have the area redrawn into an opposing district to win to allow better results for the opposing party.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus gerrymandering isn't unconstitutional. People can draw the districts however large or small that they want, there is no specification of what is lawful and what is not in the constitution There isn’t even a section or article in the entire constitution where it talks about redrawing districts. To be more specific there are no provisions (a condition or requirement in a legal document) outlined in the Constitution forbidding gerrymandering. Republicans held a majority in both houses of the state legislature, and a Republican was governor so of course they are going to draw districts into their favor; who wouldn’t? Furthermore there are little to no supreme court cases where gerrymandering was found unconstitutional. So if it is not unconstitutional or even in the constitution how can it be justiciable? The job of the supreme court is to uphold the constitution so if its constitutional it shouldn't be in the supreme…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 8th district of Pennsylvania is a suburban area just outside of Philadelphia. It is comprised of Bucks County (my home) and a small portion of Montgomery County (Legislative Reapportionment Commission 2012). Redistricting due to the 2010 census did not have a big impact on the makeup of the district. Prior to redistricting (which was controlled by a mostly Republican state government), the 8th contained a small part of Philadelphia. Philadelphia is a mostly Democratic city (as are most urban areas), so Republicans gerrymandered the Pennsylvania districts to contain almost all Philadelphia voters in one district (Legislative Reapportionment Commission 2012). They did this because they could cut the amount of Democratic support in other districts while not losing a seat in Philadelphia. Philadelphia is a district that would vote Democratic anyway, so placing more Democratic support in that district does no harm to the Republican Party. Furthermore, it wastes votes for the Democratic Party. Philadelphia, like many other large cities, votes consistently for the Democrats. So by moving Democratic support from the suburbs to Philadelphia, the Republicans lose a district that they always do, but in doing so increase their chances at the surrounding districts.…

    • 3864 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Smith, Kieth. "On Gerrymandering and Its Effects." Web log post. Political Science at University of the Pacific. Pacificpoliticalscience.wordpress.com, 2 Nov. 2011. Web. 04 Mar. 2013. <http://pacificpoliticalscience.wordpress.com/2011/11/02/on-gerrymandering-and-its-effects/>.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Great Compromise”: provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering- is the drawing of congressional districts to produce a particular electoral outcome without regard to the shape of the district.…

    • 4881 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is like a game, call it the redistricting game. Gerrymandering is an act that tries to establish a political advantage for a particular party or group. Although the Supreme Court ruled gerrymandering unconstitutional in 1986, it could possibly challenge in court. To sum gerrymandering up in a sentence. The main purpose of redistricting is to allow fewer districts for a politician opponent. They take parts of a states that they feel like would think, communicate, have the same skin color or act like there opponent and the attempt to make as few districts including them as possible. Doing this gives that candidate a higher chance of getting votes of the people in other districts. Virginia is considered to be one of the most gerrymandered…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    they asked that it be amended to include the Bill Of Rights. The Bill Of…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, I will explain why Texas should retain the partisan election of judges. Texas is one of the few states that choose their judges using a Partisan voting method. Partisan elections can be unreliable and deceitful. A high legal position such as a judge should never be chosen in such a manner. Judges are not chosen based on merit or skills.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Term Limits Case Study

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    May 22, 1995, in the U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton case the Supreme Court ruled that states cannot impose qualifications on future members of Congress stricter than what is stated in the Constitution. The case was brought to the Supreme Court when the state of Arkansas put an amendment into their state constitution that limited the number of terms any Federal Congressional and Senate candidate from Arkansas could serve. The Supreme Court ruled that “state-imposed term limits were an imperfect, and probably temporary, effort to reform a Congress whose members have become almost permanently ensconced on Capitol Hill” (Zubler 1995). Because term limits can limit the opportunity for someone to grow into their government position, limit citizen’s rights to select their own representatives, and eliminate any incentive representatives have to meet the needs of the public,…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering has become a real issue in many states. “Gerrymandering is the process where the majority party draws an election district map with district boundary lines that give itself…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Idaho Congressional DistrictToday Idaho is one of the most republican states in the United States. Since 1968, 11 of the 14 House of Representatives have been republican. Also, since 1968, there has been only one senator that was not republican. Since 1968, Idaho has been consistent with voting for a republican president. Before 1968 Idaho had a strong democratic presence. The state of Idaho has two congressional districts, the 1st congressional district and the 2nd congressional district. I currently reside in the 1st congressional district which takes up the western part of the state and the panhandle.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right now the Republicans have the majority, but it is estimated that if Clinton wins it could flip the House. Most people tend to vote strictly for their party’s candidates, but this election could cause some of them to split ticket vote. Although it is predicted that if Clinton leads by 10 points that she has a chance of giving the Democrats a lead in the House this is unlikely due to the fact that Gerrymandering is popular among the republican states. Gerrymandering is the art of redistricting in a way to help the incumbent, by concentrating or diluting the minorities, so that the incumbent’s party is likely to win, while discouraging other possible candidates for Congressional office. If the majority party changes in the House then that would drastically change the kind of policies that are made because a different party, the Democrats, would be the majority and someone from that party would become the majority leader, while the Republican Party would have to step down and become to minority…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Great Compromise

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Great Compromise was the solution to struggle of representation in the Legislative Branch during the U.S Constitutional Convention in 1787. The states with bigger populations like Virginia favored the Virginia Plan. The Virginia Plan called for representation based on the amount of people living in each state. Larger states favored this plan because they would have more power in making laws. On the other hand, smaller states like Delaware favored the New Jersey Plan, under which each state would send the same amount of representatives to Congress. Smaller states favored this because it meant equal power for everyone. This problem was solved by Roger Sherman. He proposed a bicameral legislature. Each state, as suggested by Sherman, would send an equal amount of Representatives to the House of Senate, and one representative for every 30,000 citizens to the House of Representatives. Today, the variable number of members of the House of Representatives is based on the State’s population as reported in the most recent decennial census. The process of determining the number of members of the House from each state is known as apportionment. Apportionment is the process of allocating the 435 House seats among the states according to each state’s population.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays