Preview

Why Do We Need To Be Monitored

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
530 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Do We Need To Be Monitored
The internet is such a vital part of a student's life. They use it for most things in their daily life. The internet's educational purposes are endless, and students should be able to use it without the fear of always being monitored. Monitoring in some cases is a good thing, but not all the time. In the fourth amendment of the constitution it states that the people have the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches. They should uphold this. Our government does not have the right unless under probable cause to monitor our internet. If a warrant is issued then of course they are able to go back and look at past internet usage. It is our right to be able to be safe in knowing we can search …show more content…
Also if people go to illegal websites they should be flagged to see if they go to any other harmful/illegal websites, or are doing things on the internet to harm people. For example, recently there have been a lot of allegations set on certain people for things they may have done or didn't do. If the government feels that monitoring someone's internet that has been accused of something will prevent further danger or harm to the society as a whole then it more than definitely should be allowed. A very huge thing that has been all over social media lately is the idea of net neutrality. A lot of people are trying to figure out what it is, why we need it, and many are fighting hard to keep it. One big concern that everyone has with it is the suspicion that all internet will start to be monitored. Many people believe that without net neutrality the government will control what we can and can't see, and also monitor our every move. It's not set if this is true or not because the net neutrality policies haven't been passed or set yet. Still there are many people fighting to keep it saying net neutrality is our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If someone told you “You are being watched every time you use digital communications, “how would you feel? The majority of people would probably feel discomfort. Sadly, you are being watched by the National Security Agency or NSA. While they allegedly keep us safe, the NSA shouldn't continue to monitor everyone’s digital communications. It gets every tax paying citizens money involved. They violate an amendment of the constitution. Likewise, there is a major loss of privacy. They simply have access to too much information. (Pathos)…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government has complete authority to monitor calls, emails, finances and records without their permission which is complete violation of the civil rights that each citizen of America is entitled to also the language that is used in the patriot act pertaining to this segment is very vague and challenges the human rights of the…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This makes us more prone to hacker attacks, identity thefts, and privacy right violations. A person might enjoy getting information on websites, and increasing their security on privacy. The reality is that the NSA is the one creating the same software’s meant to protect our privacy. Therefore is it not easy for them to decode these same software’s meant to keep us safe. It is true that terrorists use websites and Tele-Communication to recruit and attack, but does that make it right for government agencies to abuse the Patriot Act, and the Fourth Amendment? Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, High-five, and other forms of social networks privacy terms are virtually non existent. “Facebook and other networks do agree that on their privacy terms to use your information for marketing and Intelligence gathering purposes” Erick Montero. This means that if a certain company wanted to find out how many people like its products, movies, shows or other things, Facebook would allow it to have access to it, for certain amount cash. So the next time you click I agree, make sure to deeply think about it. Our Fourth Amendment gives us the right to not accept unlawful search seizers and in an extent the right to privacy in a persons own car, home, or property. This Amendment is no longer in existence with the rise of police brutality, backed by the city the work for. “So long as you are seen as a threat, the fourth doesn’t apply to you” Erick…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article, “At some schools, ‘Big Brother’ is watching”, by Kelly Wallace is about school districts switching over to a more cyber way of monitoring their students. When is it okay to invade others privacy rights? School districts are trying to watch over their student’s social media post and emails. They are trying to stop the self-harm, drug use, cyber bullying, and overall monitor their students lives. I disagree with this article, to keep an eye on their students because we should be able to post what we want and if we want to express our emotions to our friends on social media then why not?…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 2010, it became legal for the National Security Agency (NSA) to access private email logs, social media accounts and other internet databases (Risen & Poitras, "N.S.A. Gathers Data on Social Connections of U.S. Citizens). Risen and Poitras (2013) explain that the intention of this change was to help protect the United States (U.S.) from future terrorist attacks and was for the general purpose of national safety. It is unclear how many terrorist attacks all of this new intelligence has actually prevented, however, it is very clear that the NSA’s actions are violating the privacy of not only American citizens, but everyone who lives on American soil. With the internet as a resource, this means that they can not only listen in to conversations, but access virtually any data that is entered via the internet. This includes credit card numbers, GPS coordinates, flight destinations, contact information for family members, personal pictures and much more. The NSA not only violates the constitutional rights of American citizens, it puts everyone in the country at great personal risk for crimes such as fraud and discrimination.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NSA infiltrating the United States citizen's technology such as cell phones and computers is unjustified because there are no filters for the NSA or knowledge of their investigation taking place. For example "In his interview with RT, Binney emphasized that the FBI does not filter email messages but obtains and stores all of a person's e-mails, and when he or she becomes a target, their entire records are extracted and analyzed for the desired information" (NSA Whistleblower). Coming up with filtering processes would allow them to save time and filter out the non-terrorist threats. Many people make mistakes under pressure, knowing the National Security Agency is hunting you down is tons of pressure ask Osama bin…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world use social media sites. However, many do not realize that governments are able to use surveillance programs to spy on them. According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, surveillance is the close observation, especially of a suspected spy or criminal and it can be defined as processes of information collection and processing. Surveillance on social media has its positives and negatives and people should know how to use it responsibly, critically and effectively. Surveillance programs endanger the privacy of each Internet user. The reason that surveillance is accepted is because it can help governments find terrorists and can help solve crimes. However, it is a concern for multiple people that there is no law or regulation on how governments are able to use the programs. Moreover, the surveillance programs are sold off the shelf to governments so…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Censoring the internet doesn’t allow individuals to know the truth about the world we live in. Also, it contradicts with our law of freedom of speech. Critics argue that if we’re blind to the world, it’s more dangerous than living in a world of truth. “Critics also say that by implementing a law on internet censorship, abusive government officials will get away with their wrong practices such as abuse of power and corruption” (Green Garage). Even though that might be true, the government will always do whatever it takes to hide certain information that could break them. In the end censoring the web will always be a tough topic to debate about. Experts have made very important points on why we shouldn’t censor the web but I still believe censoring it will be a huge advancement to everyone. Censoring the web prevents human trafficking, cyber bullying and stops identity theft. It also ends things like the black market and the other illegal activities. The list of upsides that censoring the web has can go on forever. I think everyone can agree though that saving people lives and stopping criminals in the act is way more important than some “truth” that might be hidden from us. Censoring the internet will either make or break this world and in the end we have to decide whether it’s worth finding…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, if a person gets on goggle and searches how to make a bomb, the government can react to that and see what they need a bomb for. Also, wiretapping monitors questionable people. Anybody that searches anything bad or that can harm someone else,, that person will be asked about whatever they searched. This will not affect your everyday life by any means. For example, if you search something that couldn’t harm someone elso you wouldn’t get a red…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Fourth Amendment does not allow searches of personal items unless a warrant is used, but by tracking information on people it could help detect terrorism threats sooner. For example, President Obama claims that the data-collection programs “help prevent terrorism (Transcript: Obamas Remarks 4.3).” Even though people do not need a warrant to use these programs, people examine the phone numbers and length of calls, and by doing this it could ultimately protect the country from terrorism threats. Also, the U.S. Patriotism Act enables law enforcement agencies to search through “email and telephone communications, medical, financial, and library records (Legal Information Institute 1.1).” Furthermore, whenever the intelligence gathering community…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Domestic surveillance Have you ever felt like someone was watching you? The reality of the world we live in today is that people are watching us. There is a question standing: is the fact that the government is watching us constitutional or not? Is our privacy being infringed upon through the persistent prying fingers of those with higher authority? Many people have different views on this topic and there are many contributing factors to this issue.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Whether we like it or not, the internet is a part of our everyday lives now. The web is used for everything from posting selfies and finding recipes to managing bank accounts and businesses. Since the internet has become so important in today's society, people have been debating whether or not it should be monitored. No one likes being watched, but what if that monitoring prevented a murder or a terrorist attack? I believe that the state and federal government should be able to monitor the internet because it is a public place where people should have nothing to hide, the constitution has no provisions protecting internet privacy, and because monitoring the web can prevent crimes before they happen.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America has become a surveillance society, and we need to find a better balance to protect American civil right. Recent revelations about the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs have triggered diverse responses from the American public. The American Civil Liberties Union has expressed virulent opposition to the government’s alleged privacy intrusions as well as filed a lawsuit over the NSA’s collection of citizens’ telecommunications data. The National Security Agency's mass tracking and collection of Americans' phone call data violates the constitution, has a chilling effect on fourth amendment rights and should be stopped. It has been public information for a decade that the US government secretly, illegally, and unconstitutionally spies on its citizens.…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Domestic Surveillance When we talk about domestic surveillance, it often follows that we speak of the importance of privacy, of being free from observation or disturbance, from public attention. In the United States, privacy is fundamental right, listed in the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution which states: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The government started spying on the citizens of the united states because of terrorist attacks specifically the twin towers. The topic of domestic surveillance has been argued for a long time by the people of the United States and the law. In 2015 part the NSA program was ruled illegal but was not changed because of the Patriot Act.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    " In the past decade the use of the internet has increased exponentially in everyday life. We see the use of internet and media a lot in the United States now. All this new technology has made it almost effortless for someone to get access to the web. However in recent years the internet has been the center of intense controversies, one being “to what extent in the U.S. does the federal, state, and local government have the duty to monitor internet content?”. Many may say the the government should do more to monitor the internet, but I however strongly disagree.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays