They must be trained to be scared of the world, and always to be seeking some “authority” to protect and take care of them.
Whenever a problem arises, they should look to their rulers for the solution rather than taking it upon themselves to fix it.
One of the main problems that the peasants must be trained not to deal with themselves is violent conflict. It is imperative that they view you (and your enforcers) as the only protection against robbery, assault, and murder. In short, they must be indoctrinated in such a way that they do not even want to be able to defend themselves. The reason is simple: if the peasants feel capable and entitled to “enforce justice” themselves, they might just decide to enforce a little justice against you. And that obviously won’t do.
They must be trained to give up their belief in their right to defend themselves, which is not an easy thing to do. You must attack “peasant justice” in any ways you can think of, such as: 1)
“Vigilante justice can never be as just or fair as our system”; 2)
“You can’t possibly protect yourselves; let us do it”; 3) “If you have a gun, you’ll only hurt yourself”; 4) “If the peasants were allowed to use force, there would be chaos”; 5) “Private protection agencies would just deteriorate into competing gangs of thugs”; and so on. Often privately-enforced justice is referred to as the people “taking the law into their own hands,” which reinforces the idea that only enforcers of “the law” should ever use force, and of course the lowly peasants can’t be allowed to do that.
The point requires a lot of indoctrination because it is so contrary to the instinct every creature has to defend itself and its pack. A few samples of past attitudes show how far the U.S. empire has come in training its citizens to loathe the idea of having to defend themselves.
“The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms, like laws, discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property.” [Thomas Paine]
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. ... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” [Thomas Jefferson]
Even when it came to defending against foreign invasion, the founders of the United States of America abhorred the idea of a
“standing army,” and preferred instead an armed (and trained) citizen “militia.”
“A well regulated militia, composed of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” [James
Madison]
“[T]o preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” [Richard Henry Lee]
Even worse, a mere couple of centuries ago, even well-educated, respected individuals spoke openly about the possibility of the common folk using violence against their own rulers.
“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in
America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States.” [Noah Webster]
“[I]f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights and those of their fellow citizens.” [Alexander Hamilton]
“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.” [Patrick Henry]
“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” [Thomas Jefferson]
Needless to say, that is an idea that you must rip out of the minds of your subjects at all costs. The common folk should not view themselves as justified even in fending off a common crook by force, much less fending off a foreign invader, or fending off you and your thugs. The revolutionary concept of a “militia,” consisting of the people in general, which stands ready to forcibly resist tyranny even from their own “government,” must be removed by any means necessary from the realm of possibilities in the minds of the peasants.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
their defensive controls at the perimeter in the belief that this makes it difficult for…
- 5023 Words
- 21 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Born Cassius Marcellus Clay, Jr., on Jan. 17, in Louisville, Ky., to Odessa and Cassius, Sr. (a sign and mural painter).…
- 734 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A June 2013, reports of the Institute of Medicine claim that "most all firearms utilized as a part of criminal acts enter dissemination by means of starting legitimate exchange. “Somewhere around 2005 and 2010, 1.4 million firearms were stolen from US homes amid property violations, a yearly normal of 232,400.Ian Ayres, JD, PhD, and John J. Donohue, JD, PhD, Educators of Law at Yale Graduate school and Stanford Graduate school separately, state, "with weapons being an item that can be effortlessly diverted and rapidly sold at a moderately high portion of the underlying cost, the nearness of more firearms can really serve as a boost to robbery and burglary. Regardless of the fact that the firearm proprietor had a grant to convey a covered weapon…
- 151 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Gun violence dates back many years, around the time gun powder was first being produced in the 13th century. The first handgun was created in 1364 and was named the “hand cannon” (Hallowell 1), the name was self-explanatory. Nowadays hand guns are being produced that are smaller than the average persons’ palm, which is named the Swiss mini guns, these guns are being banned due to their extreme concealment capabilities. Guns revolutionized the world and brought high praises, until citizens started seeing the bad side of the guns. The fact that something so small can be so deadly can be frightening to people. Of course, I can see why people would not want guns to be banned since the constitution even allows the citizens to own a weapon. Just…
- 262 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
All guns serve different purposes. Guns have been a part of American history for many years. Many different kinds of guns have been used for many different types of jobs. Just as police use guns for law enforcement, hunters use guns to harvest game and they have different guns for different game. The two most commonly used firearms of hunters, are the rifle and the shotgun.…
- 469 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
What kind of attitude will trigger a murder? Insane as it may sound, a negative attitude might actually induce a man to kill. Indeed, attitude determines destiny. In Edgar Allan Poe’s two short stories “The Tell-Tale Heart” and “The Cask of Amontillado”, both speakers illustrate malicious and secretive attitudes towards their victims who both end up dead in a brutal way.…
- 677 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The tragic hero in the story "Oedipus the King" is Oedipus himself, and every tragic hero must have a tragic flaw; the tragic flaw for Oedipus was becoming the King when he married his mother. "Wealth, power, [and] craft of statesmanship! Kingly position everywhere admired, " stated by Oedipus, where he is in the high position of the play. Going on with the play, Oedipus discovers that his "parents" (King Polybus and Queen Merope) were not actually his real parents, making him question the King and Queen, who denies everything; Oedipus, of course, does not stop there. The reversal takes place when he hears his destiny by the oracle, leaving him to make the decision to go "to a land where [Oedipus] should never see the evil sung by the oracle,"…
- 227 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Do you know that more than 300 million firearms are owned by civilians in the United States? Or did you read about the assault in the movie premiere in Colorado? Don't you think they have already passed the limits? Then, we are on the same page. I am for the idea that gun ownership in United States should be tightly controlled due to some reasons such as; the dangerous and chaotic environment for people, increase of unlicensed gun ownership and increase in rates of young people committing suicide.…
- 578 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Gun Control is good because it can prevent any robberies or any other kind of crime. Another reason gun control is good because age’s that are not 18 or older could not buy a gun without their identity to show if they are old enough to buy a gun to prevent that child or young adult to get hurt.…
- 280 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Contrary to what many people may have seen on bumper stickers, gun control does not refer to using two hands. The legal definition of gun control is: having laws that aim to restrict or regulate the sale, purchase, or possession of firearms through licensing, registration, or identification requirements. A large number of American households or residents, approximately 40-45% of them, own at least one firearm (Agresti, James, and Smith, Reid). No matter how you look at it guns have, and will always be, around; whether they are used in the military or for personal use. However, many people have lost interest in gun activities, such as hunting and target…
- 2295 Words
- 10 Pages
Best Essays -
A gun is a weapon consisting of a metal tube, with mechanical attachments, from which projectiles are shot by the force of an explosive; a piece of ordnance (Dictionary.com). Today, there has been a lot of controversy on gun control. This controversy has arisen due to the increased gun violence crime rate. Even though guns are often viewed as bad, many people rely on them for protection. It states in our second amendment that we have the right to bear arms, although people have misused guns, taking them away will lead to a decrease in self protection. “Our Second Amendment right not only states “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” but more importantly for this issue, “shall not be infringed” (The Times News).” Even though we have our rights, guns are not unlimited. With this controversial issue there is much to consider when creating new laws and guidelines.…
- 1133 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
If we enacted more gun control laws then there wouldn't be as much problems. Gun shootings are the main reason why the kill rate is going up. That being the main cause is just something we need to stop. Gun laws are causes of violent crime in the world and it must need to be changed for people to buy guns easier to protect themselves.Gun control will help everyone in the world because it would make the world way safer.If there were more gun control laws enacted the world would be a safer place because more gun control laws would reduce gun deaths. Guns are rarely used in self defense and The presence of a gun makes a conflict more likely to become violent.…
- 837 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
While guns are owned by many Americans, there are both pro and con arguments for gun control.…
- 293 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Why do people keep guns? These days many people own and carry guns with them in the name of security and protection. Many people own guns such as rifles and shotguns for the sport of hunting. The government allows people to own and carry guns by having a background check and getting a permit, but there are many private gun sellers who sell guns without any background checks and giving permits. The possession of guns should be strictly banned because they are the sign of violence, they have increased the rates murders and insecurity, and even many children have killed other children.…
- 667 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The number of people who use the 2nd amendment for its true purpose is pretty much insignificant compared to the people who use it for all the wrong reasons. The killing and torturing, emotional as well as physical, is causing pain to those who need it the least. We believe that gun control laws are too flexible around crimes, and is almost never used for its real purpose; self defense.…
- 332 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays