Why guns should not be banned
Name:
Chapter 11- Exploratory essay- Questions for Peer Review- (261-62)
Posing the Problem:
1a) In the introduction, how have I tried to show that my problem is interesting, significant, and problematic? b) How could I engage you, my peers, more fully with my initial problem?
1a) I used an anecdote to make it more interesting. Also I said why this problem bothers me.
1b) My introduction should’ve been longer
2a) How do I provide cues that my purpose is to explore a problematic question rather than argue a thesis? b) How might the opening section of my draft be improved?
2a) I posted a question not a thesis. I didn’t show my beliefs I just showed the question.
2b) It should be a little longer
Narrating the Exploration:
3a) Is the body of my paper organized chronologically so you, my peers, can see the development of my thinking? b) Where do I provide chronological transitions?
3a) Yes it is organized chronologically.
3b)When I use an anecdote and the say why I did next. By saying the order in which I found the articles
4a) Part of an exploratory essay involves summarizing the argument of each new research source. b)Where in this draft are my summaries of sources particularly clear and well developed? c) Where are my summary passages either: undeveloped, unclear, or too long? d) How could I improve these passages?
4b) At the beginning of the third paragraph. 4c)The first summary is a little short. 4d) By making it longer
5a) Another part of an exploratory essay involves a writer’s strong response to each source. b) b) Where in this draft is there clear evidence of my own critical thinking and questioning? c) Where are my ideas particularly strong and effective? d) Where are my ideas undeveloped, unclear, or weak? 5b)After each summary 6a) Have I done enough research to explore the problem? b) How would you describe the range and
Chapter 11- Exploratory essay- Questions for Peer Review- (261-62)
Posing the Problem:
1a) In the introduction, how have I tried to show that my problem is interesting, significant, and problematic? b) How could I engage you, my peers, more fully with my initial problem?
1a) I used an anecdote to make it more interesting. Also I said why this problem bothers me.
1b) My introduction should’ve been longer
2a) How do I provide cues that my purpose is to explore a problematic question rather than argue a thesis? b) How might the opening section of my draft be improved?
2a) I posted a question not a thesis. I didn’t show my beliefs I just showed the question.
2b) It should be a little longer
Narrating the Exploration:
3a) Is the body of my paper organized chronologically so you, my peers, can see the development of my thinking? b) Where do I provide chronological transitions?
3a) Yes it is organized chronologically.
3b)When I use an anecdote and the say why I did next. By saying the order in which I found the articles
4a) Part of an exploratory essay involves summarizing the argument of each new research source. b)Where in this draft are my summaries of sources particularly clear and well developed? c) Where are my summary passages either: undeveloped, unclear, or too long? d) How could I improve these passages?
4b) At the beginning of the third paragraph. 4c)The first summary is a little short. 4d) By making it longer
5a) Another part of an exploratory essay involves a writer’s strong response to each source. b) b) Where in this draft is there clear evidence of my own critical thinking and questioning? c) Where are my ideas particularly strong and effective? d) Where are my ideas undeveloped, unclear, or weak? 5b)After each summary 6a) Have I done enough research to explore the problem? b) How would you describe the range and