Why Is Abortion Morally Wrong

Imagine a person sitting on the operation table, a doctor being the procedure, to abort their unborn child. They can hear the baby screaming and crying in pain. Would they then still support abortion? There has been a large debate over many years of the two conflicting values. The right of a woman to decide for herself whether or not she should end her pregnancy versus protecting a vulnerable human life. The biggest disagreement to stir this argument is whether or not an embryo is a human being while inside of the mother’s womb. Although this is a consistently heated debate, abortion is cruel and inhumane and should not be allowed. One reason abortion is cruel and inhumane and should not be allowed is because aborting a helpless baby is morally wrong in many aspects. For example, in the article “Late-Term Abortion
Wills there is a short story that says “In March 1996, in riveting eyewitness testimony to Congress, a nurse gave “partial-birth abortion” a face--specifically the “most perfectly angelic face” of a baby boy at 26 ½ weeks’ gestational age. Dr. Martin Haskell had delivered a boy alive, feet first, up to his neck, then stuck scissors into the base of his skull, inserted a suction tube and vacuumed his brain. In other words, Dr. Haskell performed an abortion on a baby of 26 weeks gestational age, this is more immoral because of the fact the baby was so far along and so developed making it more like murder. This is morally wrong on so many levels, not only did he perform an abortion, but he killed a baby alive and fully awake. In the article “Should Abortion Be Legal?” by procon.org it states that “Bernard N. Nathanson, MD, a late abortion doctor, who renounced his earlier work