Why Is Animal Testing Bad

Most of your everyday medicine comes from animal testing. Medical testing on animals is when scientists test different medicines and procedures on animals. Sometimes the testing results in a positive way and could save lives of many people or animals. There are people that disagree with the testing because they think it is "cruel". Animal testing in the medical field is a big thing. Medical testing on animals does more good that harm. The animals that are tested on benefit from the results of animal testing. Research using animals has played a vital part in nearly every medical breakthrough over the last decade such as vaccines. Also, the testing does not hurt the subject's population.

Animals themselves benefit from the results of medical
CT scans and MRI's have been developed because of research done on animals. The x-rays coming from the machines cant tell the difference between different types of tissues so that

makes animals a subject to test on. Penicillin's properties were discovered through animal testing. Ernst Chain studied the drug on animals at Oxford University. It has saved countless lives during WW2 Thanks to research on animals, small pox has been eradicated from earth. People who oppose animal testing may say that you can use other things besides animals as test subjects but there is nothing closer to human than animals.

Medical testing on animals does not hurt their population. A majority of testing is done on mice which repopulate with ease. One female mouse can have up to 10 litters per year with an average of 6-8 mice per litter. Dogs, cats, and apes make up for only 0.2% of animals used in testing. The UK alone consumes more fish in one year than all animals used on animal testing. This means that only 100 million animals are used in testing compares to the 30 billion fish consumed. Opponents may say that taking an animals life isn't a good thing but they have an abundant supply of them. Therefore, the good outweighs the