Why Is Animal Testing Unnecessary

Animal experimentation is wrong and cruel and there are many reasons why it is not necessary today. Animal testing is ineffective and extremely cruel because science has improved and animal testing may not transfer effectively to humans. Animals testing has been applied throughout human history. The use of animals in scientific experiments in the United Kingdom can be traced back to at least the 17th century with the experiments on numerous animal species aiming to demonstrate blood circulation (“History of Animal Research”). Once animal testing became known, it expanded. During the late 19th and the 20th centuries, the expansion of medical science meant that the number of animals used in research expanded steadily (“History of Animal Research”). “The number of animals used rose to over 5.5 million in 1970 after this point the numbers began to decline rapidly (“History of Animal Research”).” Most of the medical advances that happened in the 20th century were from animal experimentation.
Animal testing is a controversial issue for the United States but not Britain and Europe. Once using
While reduce would be reducing the number of animals used, by improving experimental techniques and sharing information with other researchers so that the experiments using animals would decrease rapidly. Finally, refine would be described as refining the way the animals are cared if they are used in a laboratory minimizing any stress or pain, by using less invasive techniques as possible and improving medical care and living conditions. These three words can help many people remember why using animals in experimentation is not necessary and can be improved. It can also help inform more people on the controversial subject of using animals in laboratories and why it is not